Higher Maternal Protectiveness Is Associated with Higher Odds of Child Overweight and Obesity: A Longitudinal Australian Study

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, United States of America
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 06/2014; 9(6):e100686. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100686
Source: PubMed


In recent years there has been an increasing interest in overprotective parenting and the potential role it plays in child development. While some have argued that a trend towards increased parental fear and reduced opportunity for independent mobility may be linked to increasing rates of child overweight and obesity, there is limited empirical information available to support this claim. Using data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, this study aimed to examine the longitudinal relationships between maternal protectiveness and child overweight and obesity. A cohort of 4-5 year old children was followed up at 6-7, 8-9 and 10-11 years of age (n = 2596). Measures included a protective parenting scale administered when children were 6-7 and 8-9 years of age, child body mass index (BMI), family characteristics including household income, neighbourhood disadvantage, child's position amongst siblings, and maternal BMI, education, employment, mental health and age at first birth. International Obesity Taskforce age- and sex-specific BMI cut points were used to determine if children were in the normal, overweight or obese BMI range. There was no association between maternal protectiveness and the odds of children being overweight or obese at age 4-5, 6-7 or 8-9 years. However at age 10-11 years, a 1 standard deviation increase in maternal protectiveness was associated with a 13% increase in the odds of children being overweight or obese. The results provide evidence of a relationship between maternal protectiveness and child overweight and obesity, however further research is required to understand the mechanism(s) that links the two concepts.

Download full-text


Available from: Kirsten J Hancock, Jun 25, 2014
  • Source
    • "Despite increases in readily accessible information about how to achieve goals across time, children may have fewer opportunities to practice selfdirection today than in previous eras. In addition to changes in technological access, growing societal emphasis on early skill acquisition and heightened parental vigilance have contributed to reductions in the time children spend in unsupervised activities, including independent travel and play (Clements, 2004; Hancock, Lawrence & Zubrick, 2014). Activities such as outdoor play have increasingly been supplanted by media activities, such as video game play, computing, and television watching (Vandewater et al., 2007; Johnson, 2010; Bavelier et al., 2010; Hofferth, 2010), which are often more passive, and potentially offer fewer opportunities for child decisionmaking , than other forms of leisure. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: How do children become increasingly self-directed across development, achieving their goals without help from others? How might such developments be impacted by societal changes in how children spend their time? Children's abilities to achieve their goals are supported by developing executive functions (EFs), cognitive processes that predict important life outcomes. Efforts to improve children's EFs have benefitted their externally driven executive functioning, where goals and instructions are provided by others. Less is known about self-directed EF, when children must decide independently what to do and when. We present recent findings demonstrating that children are better at engaging self-directed EF when they have good understanding of options to choose among, and if they spend time in activities that they play a large role in directing. Within this context, we discuss the potential role of opportunities to plan, mind-wander, and play, and present the critical next steps in investigating the influence of changing environments on self-directed EF.
    Mind Brain and Education 06/2015; 9(2). DOI:10.1111/mbe.12071 · 1.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Early life may be a "critical period" when appetite and regulation of energy balance are programmed, with lifelong consequences for obesity risk. Insight into the potential impact of modifying early-life risk factors on later obesity can be gained by evaluating their combined effects. The objective was to examine the relation between the number of early-life risk factors and obesity outcomes among children in a prospective birth cohort (Southampton Women's Survey). Five risk factors were defined: maternal obesity [prepregnant body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)) >30], excess gestational weight gain (Institute of Medicine, 2009), smoking during pregnancy, low maternal vitamin D status (<64 nmol/L), and short duration of breastfeeding (none or <1 mo). Obesity outcomes examined when the children were aged 4 and 6 y were BMI, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-assessed fat mass, overweight, or obesity (International Obesity Task Force). Data were available for 991 mother-child pairs, with children born between 1998 and 2003. Of the children, 148 (15%) had no early-life risk factors, 330 (33%) had 1, 296 (30%) had 2, 160 (16%) had 3, and 57 (6%) had 4 or 5. At both 4 and 6 y, there were positive graded associations between number of early-life risk factors and each obesity outcome (all P < 0.001). After taking account of confounders, the relative risk of being overweight or obese for children who had 4 or 5 risk factors was 3.99 (95% CI: 1.83, 8.67) at 4 y and 4.65 (95% CI: 2.29, 9.43) at 6 y compared with children who had none (both P < 0.001). Having a greater number of early-life risk factors was associated with large differences in adiposity and risk of overweight and obesity in later childhood. These findings suggest that early intervention to change these modifiable risk factors could make a significant contribution to the prevention of childhood obesity.
    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 02/2015; 101(2):368-75. DOI:10.3945/ajcn.114.094268 · 6.77 Impact Factor

  • Frontiers in Psychology 11/2015; 6:1849. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01849 · 2.80 Impact Factor