Patient-Reported Aesthetic Satisfaction with Breast Reconstruction during the Long-Term Survivorship Perio

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.33). 08/2009; 124(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ab10b2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Expander/implant and autogenous tissue breast reconstructions have different aging processes, and the time when these processes stabilize is unclear. The authors' goal was to evaluate long-term patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with expander/implant and autogenous breast reconstruction.
The authors surveyed a cross-section of University of Michigan women who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction (response rate, 73 percent) between 1988 and 2006 [110 expander/implant and 109 transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) reconstructions]. Each group was stratified into three postreconstructive periods: short term (<or=5 years), intermediate (6 to 8 years), and long term (>8 years). Validated satisfaction items were scored on a 5-point Likert scale; scores were dichotomized into positive and negative responses. Logistic regression assessed satisfaction by procedure, while controlling for sociodemographic and clinical variables.
Mean follow-up time after reconstruction was 6.5 years (range, 1 to 18 years). Procedure type had no effect on short-term aesthetic satisfaction. However, in the long term, reconstruction type considerably affected satisfaction. Although satisfaction with TRAM reconstruction remained relatively constant, satisfaction with expander/implants was significantly less among those patients in the long term. Patients who had undergone implant reconstruction more than 8 years earlier, compared with those who undergone implant reconstruction less than 5 years earlier, were significantly less satisfied with breast appearance (odds ratio, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.48), softness (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.64), and size (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.62).
In the long term, TRAM patients, compared with expander/implant patients, appear to have significantly greater aesthetic satisfaction. These long-term data have important implications for women's health in the survivorship period and will help women navigate the complex decision-making process of breast reconstruction.

  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons 12/2009; 209(6):790; author reply 790. DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.08.016 · 4.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patient satisfaction is a major factor in determining success in aesthetic surgery. To the authors' knowledge, a long-term study measuring patient satisfaction with face-lift surgery has not been published. The authors' study was designed to measure patient satisfaction with the overall experience of a face lift and to assess the patient's level of satisfaction 10 to 15 years after surgery. Three hundred ninety-four consecutive patients were identified who had face lifts performed by the senior author (J.Q.O.) between January 1, 1994, and January 1, 1999. Contact was achieved with 146 patients (37 percent), and 131 patients (90 percent) agreed to participate by completing a four-page survey. Eighty-nine patients (68 percent) returned the survey. One year after face-lift surgery, 87 patients (97.8 percent) described the improvement of their facial appearance as very good or beyond expectations. After an average follow-up of 12.6 years, 61 patients (68.5 percent) rated their current degree of improvement as very good or beyond expectations, and 61 patients (68.5 percent) felt 10 or more years had been added to their youthful appearance. Thirty-four patients (31 percent) indicated disappointment in some aspect of the face lift. This work assesses the long-term satisfaction of face-lift patients who had a superficial musculoaponeurotic system-platysma face lift. The results suggest a high degree of satisfaction following face-lift surgery at short-term and long-term follow-up. The authors recognize that recall bias may be present when recalling the satisfaction at 1 year postoperatively. We present the survey questionnaire as a template for future research in face-lift patients.
    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 03/2010; 126(1):245-57. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181dbc2f0 · 3.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Postmastectomy irradiation often negatively impacts breast reconstruction outcomes. Further investigation is necessary to recognize factors contributing to adverse results. The purpose of this study was to (1) accurately assess the impact of radiation on autologous breast reconstruction and (2) identify patient and treatment factors affecting reconstructive outcomes. One hundred twenty-six patients were considered after postmastectomy breast reconstruction and irradiation. The records of 76 patients were studied after excluding for radiation therapy before reconstruction, complications before irradiation, implant reconstruction, mastectomy for recurrent disease, and history of cancer. Patient demographics and comorbidities, operative details, adjuvant therapy, and treatment outcomes were assessed. Seventy-six patients underwent autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction. Complications occurred in 53 patients (70 percent) 7.2 +/- 6 months after irradiation; 36 cases (47 percent) required reoperation for postirradiation effects. Parenchymal complications (fat necrosis or parenchymal fibrosis) were noted in 19.7 percent, skin complications (tissue envelope retraction or hypertrophic scarring) were recorded in 30.3 percent, and general dissatisfaction (physician or patient dissatisfaction) arose in 27.6 percent of patients. Parenchymal complications were associated with smoking (odds ratio, 9.3; p = 0.03), type II diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 8.5; p = 0.02), and age (odds ratio, 1.1; p = 0.02). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased the development of complications (odds ratio, 4.4; p = 0.04), particularly skin changes (odds ratio, 2.4; p = 0.01). Patient-specific factors, including diabetes mellitus and smoking, increase the risk of postirradiation parenchymal changes, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a greater than twofold increase in skin complications. Breast reconstruction followed by irradiation can be successful, but patients with specific risks should be aware of increased complication rates.
    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 03/2010; 126(1):12-6. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181da878f · 3.33 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications


1 Download