Biophysical annotation and representation of CellML models

Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, 70 Symonds Street, Auckland, New Zealand.
Bioinformatics (Impact Factor: 4.98). 07/2009; 25(17):2263-70. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp391
Source: PubMed


MOTIVATION: CellML is an implementation-independent model description language for specifying and exchanging biological processes. The focus of CellML is the representation of mathematical formulations of biological processes. The language captures the mathematical and model building constructs well, but does not lend itself to capturing the biology these models represent. RESULTS: This article describes the development of an ontological framework for annotating CellML models with biophysical concepts. We demonstrate that, by using these ontological mappings, in combination with a set of graph reduction rules, it is possible to represent the underlying biological process described in a CellML model.

Download full-text


Available from: Matt D. B. Halstead, Nov 05, 2015
1 Follower
6 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Physiome Project was established to develop tools for international collaboration and sharing physiological knowledge in the form of biological models and experimental data. The CellML language was developed in response to the need for a high-level language to represent and exchange mathematical models of biological processes. The language provides a flexible framework for describing the dynamics of biological processes but does not explicitly lend itself to capturing the underlying biological concepts such as the entities and processes that these models represent. The relationship between the biological process and the mathematical model describing the biological process is also often complex. This makes it difficult to see the biological concepts which the CellML structures represent. A framework which supports visualizing the biological concepts and its relationship to the underlying CellML model would provide a very useful toolset for understanding the biological concepts modeled in CellML. The CellML models need to be annotated with biological concepts in order to provide the machine interpretable data for generating a visual representation. We have developed an ontological framework which can be used to explicitly annotate CellML models with physical and biological concepts, a method to derive a simplified biological view from the annotations, a visual language for representing all biophysical processes captured in the CellML models, and a method to map the visual language to the ontological framework in order to automate the generation of visual representations of a model. The proposed method of model visualization produces a result that is dependent on the structure of the CellML models which requires modelers to structure the model in a way that best describes the biophysical concepts and abstractions they wish to demonstrate. Our argument is that this leads to a best practice approach to building and organizing models. As a part of this research, a software tool for visualizing CellML models was developed. This tool combines the visual language and the ontologies to generate visualizations that depict the physical and biological concepts captured in CellML models and enables different communities in diverse disciplines to more easily understand CellML models within the biological domain they represent. As research continues, with further improvement to the framework it would be possible to visually construct composite CellML models by selecting high level biological concepts.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: MOTIVATION: The Physiome Project was established in 1997 to develop tools to facilitate international collaboration in the physiological sciences and the sharing of biological models and experimental data. The CellML language was developed to represent and exchange mathematical models of biological processes. CellML models can be very complicated, making it difficult to interpret the underlying physical and biological concepts and relationships captured/described in the mathematical model. RESULTS: To address this issue a set of ontologies was developed to explicitly annotate the biophysical concepts represented in the CellML models. This article presents a framework that combines a visual language, together with CellML ontologies, to support the visualization of the underlying physical and biological concepts described by the mathematical model and also their relationships with the CellML model. Automated CellML model visualization assists in the interpretation of model concepts and facilitates model communication and exchange between different communities.
    Bioinformatics 09/2009; 25(22):3012-9. DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp495 · 4.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The field of synthetic biology holds an inspiring vision for the future; it integrates computational analysis, biological data and the systems engineering paradigm in the design of new biological machines and systems. These biological machines are built from basic biomolecular components analogous to electrical devices, and the information flow among these components requires the augmentation of biological insight with the power of a formal approach to information management. Here we review the informatics challenges in synthetic biology along three dimensions: in silico, in vitro and in vivo. First, we describe state of the art of the in silico support of synthetic biology, from the specific data exchange formats, to the most popular software platforms and algorithms. Next, we cast in vitro synthetic biology in terms of information flow, and discuss genetic fidelity in DNA manipulation, development strategies of biological parts and the regulation of biomolecular networks. Finally, we explore how the engineering chassis can manipulate biological circuitries in vivo to give rise to future artificial organisms. © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: [email protected] /* */
    Briefings in Bioinformatics 11/2009; 11(1):80-95. DOI:10.1093/bib/bbp054 · 9.62 Impact Factor
Show more