Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma.

Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Nature Biotechnology (Impact Factor: 32.44). 07/2009; 27(7):633-41. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1546
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Verification of candidate biomarkers relies upon specific, quantitative assays optimized for selective detection of target proteins, and is increasingly viewed as a critical step in the discovery pipeline that bridges unbiased biomarker discovery to preclinical validation. Although individual laboratories have demonstrated that multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) coupled with isotope dilution mass spectrometry can quantify candidate protein biomarkers in plasma, reproducibility and transferability of these assays between laboratories have not been demonstrated. We describe a multilaboratory study to assess reproducibility, recovery, linear dynamic range and limits of detection and quantification of multiplexed, MRM-based assays, conducted by NCI-CPTAC. Using common materials and standardized protocols, we demonstrate that these assays can be highly reproducible within and across laboratories and instrument platforms, and are sensitive to low mug/ml protein concentrations in unfractionated plasma. We provide data and benchmarks against which individual laboratories can compare their performance and evaluate new technologies for biomarker verification in plasma.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The in silico prediction of the best-observable "proteotypic" peptides in mass spectrometry-based workflows is a challenging problem. Being able to accurately predict such peptides would enable the informed selection of proteotypic peptides for targeted quantification of previously observed and non-observed proteins for any organism, with a significant impact for clinical proteomics and systems biology studies. Current prediction algorithms rely on physicochemical parameters in combination with positive and negative training sets to identify those peptide properties that most profoundly affect their general detectability. Here we present PeptideRank, an approach that uses a learning to rank algorithm for peptide detectability prediction from shotgun proteomics data, and that eliminates the need to select a negative dataset for the training step. A large number of different peptide properties are used to train ranking models in order to predict a ranking of the best-observable peptides within a protein. Empirical evaluation with rank accuracy metrics showed that PeptideRank complements existing prediction algorithms. Our results indicate that the best performance is achieved when it is trained on organism-specific shotgun proteomics data, and that PeptideRank is most accurate for short to medium-sized and abundant proteins, without any loss in prediction accuracy for the important class of membrane proteins.
    Journal of proteomics. 05/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stable isotope dilution-selective reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry (SID-SRM-MS) has been widely used for the absolute quantitative analysis of proteins. However, when performing the large-scale absolute quantification of proteins from a more complex tissue sample, such as mouse liver, in addition to a high-throughput approach for the preparation and calibration of large amounts of stable-isotope-labelled internal standards, a more powerful separation method prior to SRM analysis is also urgently needed. To address these challenges, a high-throughput absolute quantification strategy based on an improved two-dimensional reversed-phase (2D RP) separation and quantification concatemer (QconCAT) approach is presented in this study. This strategy can be used to perform the simultaneous quantification of hundreds of proteins from mouse liver within one week of total MS measurement time. By using calibrated synthesised peptides from the protein glutathione S-transferase (GST), large amounts of GST-tagged QconCAT internal standards corresponding to hundreds of proteins can be accurately and rapidly quantified. Additionally, using an improved 2D RP separation method, a mixture containing a digested sample and QconCAT standards can be efficiently separated and absolutely quantified. When a maximum gradient of 72 min is employed in the first LC dimension, resulting in 72 fractions, identification and absolute quantification experiments for all fractions can be completed within one week of total MS measurement time. The quantification approach developed here can further extend the dynamic range and increase the analytical sensitivity of SRM analysis of complex tissue samples, thereby helping to increase the coverage of absolute quantification in a whole proteome.
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 04/2014; · 3.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RATIONALEApolipoprotein(a) is a polymorphic glycoprotein covalently bound to apoB100 in Lp(a) particles and has been described to be both atherogenic and prothrombotic, although its exact mechanism of action is not well defined. Apolipoprotein(a) is routinely measured by immunoassays. Unfortunately, the accuracy of the measurement can be affected by the apolipoprotein(a) size (number of kringles) polymorphism in Lp(a) particles. Here we describe an ultra-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (UPLC/MS) assay that is capable of measuring apolipoprotein(a) concentrations while simultaneously determining the number of kringles present per protein.METHODS Plasma samples were diluted and proteins de-lipidated with deoxycholate prior to tryptic digestion. Distinct tryptic peptides from different regions of apolipoprotein(a) were measured to determine both concentration and the number of kringles present per protein. Separation and quantitation of tryptic peptides is carried out at 700 μL/min using a 1.7 µm C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm) coupled to a Thermo Vantage triple quadrupole (QQQ) mass spectrometer with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI) source.RESULTSThis method was compared to established methods for measuring concentration (monoclonal antibody based ELISA) and size (gel-electrophoresis) using 80 plasma samples proved by NWLRL. The slope and r2 value for the correlation of concentrations were determined to be 0.96 and 0.98, demonstrating excellent agreement of absolute values between the UPLC/MS and ELISA methods. As measured by UPLC/MS, the average kringle number or size is smaller than determined by the electrophoretic method.CONCLUSIONSA single UPLC/MS method was developed capable of measuring apolipoprotein(a) concentration and size (by measuring the number of kringles per protein). This assay passes criteria required for 'fit for purpose' assays including sensitivity, intra and interday reproducibility and freeze/thaw stability. While the agreement between UPLC/MS and ELISA is excellent for concentration and may provide researchers with additional tools for studying apolipoprotein(a), the dissimilarities between UPLC/MS and the electrophoretic method may also be exploited for understanding apolipoprotein(a) structure and function. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 05/2014; 28(10). · 2.51 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 1, 2014