Article

The systemic inflammatory response syndrome in cirrhotic patients: Relationship with their in-hospital outcome

Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Journal of Hepatology (Impact Factor: 10.4). 05/2009; 51(3):475-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.04.017
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Some evidence suggests that the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) contributes to the poor outcome of cirrhotic patients. We studied 141 cirrhotic patients consecutively admitted to a tertiary referral centre assessing prevalence of SIRS and its relationship with in-hospital outcome.
Presence of SIRS was assessed on admission and during hospital stay. Main clinical outcomes were death and development of portal hypertension-related complications.
Thirty-nine patients met SIRS criteria. SIRS was present on admission in 20 of 141 patients (14.1%), whereas it occurred during hospital stay in 19 of 121 (15.7%). SIRS was correlated with bacterial infection at admission (p=0.02), jaundice (p=0.011), high serum creatinine levels (p=0.04), high serum bilirubin levels (p=0.002), high international normalized ratio (p=0.046), high model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (p=0.001), and high SOFA score (p=0.003). During a follow-up of 14+/-8 days, 16 patients died (11%), 7 developed portal hypertension-related bleeding (5%), 16 hepatic encephalopathy (11%), and 5 hepatorenal syndrome type-1 (3.5%). SIRS was correlated both to death (p<0.001) and to portal hypertension-related complications (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, SIRS and MELD were independently associated with death.
SIRS frequently occurs in patients with advanced cirrhosis and is associated with a poor outcome.

Full-text

Available from: Massimo Cazzaniga, Apr 18, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
108 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute gastric variceal bleeding (GVB) is a catastrophic problem and accounts for one of the major causes of death in cirrhotic patients. Although, N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBC) has been shown to control bleeding effectively, it still carries up high mortality rate. This study aimed to find the predictors of mortality within 6 weeks after emergent endoscopic treatment with NBC injection.This retrospective study recruited patients with acute GVB after emergent endoscopic NBC injection between January 2011 and June 2013 in Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan. Logistic regression analysis was applied for predictors of mortality within 6 weeks. Statistical significance was set as P < 0.05.There were 132 patients with acute GVB (83.3% men, median age 51.3 years) with endoscopic NBC injection treatments recruited. Mortality within 6 weeks was noted in 16.7% patients. By multivariate analysis, renal function impairment (odds ratio [OR]: 21.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.06-146.0, P = 0.002), higher Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score (OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.41-4.38, P = 0.002), higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.03-1.35, P = 0.013), rebleeding within 5 days (OR: 16.4, 95% CI: 3.36-79.7, P = 0.001), and acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) (OR: 4.67, 95% CI: 1.62-13.33, P = 0.004) were independent predictors of mortality within 6 weeks. A MELD score of ≥18 was associated with Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) of 0.79 (P < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.69-0.90) and a CTP score of ≥9 with AUROC of 0.85 (P < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.76-0.94) for determining 6 weeks mortality.Impaired renal function, deteriorated liver function with CTP score ≥ 9 as well as MELD score ≥18, rebleeding within 5 days, and ACLF are independent predictors of mortality.
    Medicine 12/2014; 93(29):e321. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000000321 · 4.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Renal dysfunction is common in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and takes on many forms from acute to chronic renal injury and may involve a variety of mechanisms. Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a specific type of hepatorenal disorders (HRD) with a unique pathophysiology. HRS is characterized by splanchnic arterial vasodilatation and decreased effective intravascular volume that leads to renal vasoconstriction and decreased renal blood flow. The incidence of HRS in relation to other forms of HRD is unknown, however, it is estimated that 35-40 % patients with ESLD and ascites eventually develop the condition. Two subtypes of HRS have been described. Type 1 HRS is rapidly progressive, whereas renal function in type 2 HRS deteriorates slowly over weeks or months. Type 1 HRS may be precipitated by sepsis or acute alcoholic hepatitis and occasionally develops in patients who already have type 2 HRS. Diagnosis of HRS is based on exclusion of other causes of renal dysfunction as there is no specific test available. Definitive treatment of HRS is liver transplantation. As a bridge to liver transplantation, medical management with volume expansion and use of vasoconstrictors is often implemented. Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) has been attempted at treating hepatorenal syndrome, although there is little evidence of its efficacy compared to standard therapy. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is often used if the patient is a liver transplant candidate. Artificial liver assist devices are in the research phase.
    Chest 03/2015; DOI:10.1378/chest.14-1925 · 7.13 Impact Factor
  • Hepatology International 09/2014; 8(S2):467-474. DOI:10.1007/s12072-014-9522-z · 2.47 Impact Factor