Concept of ideal closure line for clipping of middle cerebral artery aneurysms--technical note.

Department of Surgical Neurology, Research Institute for Brain and Blood Vessels-Akita, Akita, Japan.
Neurologia medico-chirurgica (Impact Factor: 0.72). 07/2009; 49(6):273-7; discussion 277-8.
Source: PubMed


The concept of optimum closure line was applied to a series of 51 consecutive middle cerebral artery aneurysms (14 ruptured, 37 unruptured) in 41 patients, 16 men and 25 women aged 29-79 years (mean 59.1 years). Visual inspection through the operating microscope revealed 3 types of aneurysm based on the origin of the aneurysm: bifurcation type (n = 39), trunk type (n = 9), and combined type (n = 3). Clipping along the optimum closure line should restore the vascular structure to the original configuration. Combination clip techniques were useful to form a curved closure line. This technique requires adequate operative fields with dissection of the aneurysm and related arteries from the neighboring structures as far as possible. The closure line concept is helpful to decide how to apply clips for particular aneurysms to avoid risks of ischemic complication and future recurrence. Combination clip techniques are often necessary to match a curved closure line.

12 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Craniotomy and clipping have been robust treatments for ruptured cerebral aneurysm for more than 50 years, with satisfactory overall outcomes. Technical advances, such as developments in microsurgical tools and equipment, adjunctive therapy, and novel monitoring methods enable safer and more efficient treatment. However, overall surgical results have not shown any major improvements, as outcomes are mainly determined by the damage from initial bleeding, and new treatment strategies are not always free from associated complications and problems. Recent advances in endovascular treatment are shifting the treatment for ruptured cerebral aneurysm from craniotomy and clipping to intravascular coil embolization. However, craniotomy and clipping are very important for the treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysm. This paper discusses recent advances and future perspectives in the field of clipping surgery for ruptured aneurysms.
    Neurologia medico-chirurgica 01/2010; 50(9):800-8. DOI:10.2176/nmc.50.800 · 0.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Unplanned re-exploration of the craniotomy after surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is sometimes required, but the underlying causes and rates of these procedures are seldom reported. This study retrospectively analyzed the causes of such re-explorations to identify methods for decreasing their necessity. From January 2000 to December 2011, 1,720 patients with a total of 1,938 UIAs underwent surgical treatment at our institution. From this cohort, 26 patients (1.5 %) with 38 UIAs required re-exploration. Clinical data, aneurysm characteristics, treatment methods, and the incidence and causes of re-exploration of the craniotomy were analyzed for these 26 patients. Several causes of re-exploration were identified: compromised distal blood flow (eight patients, 0.47 %), hemorrhagic venous infarction (four patients, 0.23 %), brain retraction injury (three patients, 0.17 %), newly identified aneurysms (three patients, 0.17 %), bleeding from an incompletely clipped aneurysm (two patients, 0.12 %), epidural hematoma (two patients, 0.12 %), failed aneurysm clipping (two patients, 0.12 %) and other causes (two patients, 0.12 %). Annual re-exploration incidence rates ranged from 0 to 3.1 %. Annual incidence rates gradually decreased following the introduction of several intraoperative monitoring systems. Precise surgical planning and careful operative techniques can reduce the incidence of unplanned re-exploration of the craniotomy. The introduction of various intraoperative monitoring systems can also contribute to a reduction in this incidence.
    Acta Neurochirurgica 03/2014; 156(5). DOI:10.1007/s00701-014-2059-z · 1.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One of the major causes for performing unplanned re-exploration of a craniotomy after microsurgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is compromised distal blood flow after clipping. Therefore, it is important to identify the causes of compromised distal blood flow after clipping and the factors that influence the prognosis for re-exploration in order to decrease ischemic complications related to clipping UIAs. Between January 2007 and December 2013, 1954 patients underwent microsurgery for UIAs. In this cohort, 20 patients (1.0 %) required unplanned re-exploration of the craniotomy for several reasons, and 11 patients (0.6 %) underwent unplanned re-exploration with clip repositioning or changing of the previous clip because of compromised distal blood flow after clipping. Patient characteristics, aneurysm properties, intraoperative findings, annual incidence and prognosis were analyzed in these 11 patients. The annual incidence of re-exploration has gradually decreased since the introduction of several intraoperative monitoring techniques. In total, 3.0 % of UIAs in the M1 trunk, 0.8 % of UIAs at the origin of the anterior choroidal artery (AchA) and 0.5 % of UIAs at the bifurcation of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) required re-exploration. Here, all 11 UIAs had broad necks, and atherosclerosis was identified around 10 UIAs. Six patients with compromised MCA flow demonstrated relatively better outcomes following re-exploration than five patients with a compromised lenticulostriate artery (LSA) or AchA flow. Four patients with delayed ischemic symptoms demonstrated relatively better outcomes than the seven patients who developed ischemic symptoms immediately postoperatively. Clinicians need to be more careful not to compromise distal blood flow when clipping UIAs at the MCA and AchA origin. Various intraoperative monitoring techniques can help reduce the incidence of compromised distal blood flow after clipping.
    Acta Neurochirurgica 04/2015; 157(6). DOI:10.1007/s00701-015-2408-6 · 1.77 Impact Factor
Show more