Hydration status does not influence peritoneal equilibration test ultrafiltration volumes.

University College London Center for Nephrology, University College London Medical School, London, UK.
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (Impact Factor: 5.07). 06/2009; 4(7):1207-12. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.01060209
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The peritoneal equilibration test (PET) was developed some 25 yr ago and has been used to help prescribe peritoneal dialysis. However, PET is affected by several factors, including diabetes and inflammation. It was speculated that extracellular fluid overload would increase PET ultrafiltration volumes, and therefore the usefulness of the PET in routine clinical practice was audited.
Data from 211 consecutive patients attending a university teaching hospital for a standard PET who had multifrequency bioimpedance performance were analyzed to determine which factors affected net PET ultrafiltration volumes.
Net PET ultrafiltration volume was independent of gender, age, diabetes, residual renal function, peritoneal dialysis prescriptions (modes and dialysates), extracellular fluid volume, or C-reactive protein (CRP). There was an inverse regression with serum albumin and sodium on multiple logistical regression analysis (F = 13.4, P < 0.001 and F = 10.1, P = 0.001, respectively) and a positive regression with 24-h net peritoneal ultrafiltration volumes (F = 15.5, P < 0.001). As expected, there was a strong correlation with net sodium losses (r = 0.99, P < 0001).
It was found that PET test ultrafiltration volume in routine clinical practice was not affected by CRP, hyperglycemia, or extracellular fluid volume overload. Ultrafiltration volumes were increased in those patients with reduced serum sodium and albumin, most likely because of inflammation and protein malnutrition.

  • Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. 09/2013; 33(5):578-9.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intradialytic hypotension remains the commonest complication of routine outpatient haemodialysis treatments. Multifrequency bioimpedance allows assessment of body fluid volumes. Multifrequency bioimpedance can potentially monitor changes in extracellular volume during dialysis and may therefore help to reduce intradialytic hypotension. Hypotension-prone patients have been reported to start dialysis with relatively more fluid distributed in the trunk than the arms. However, as arterio-venous fistulae are the preferred form of vascular access and fistulae could potentially affect fluid retention in the arm, we investigated whether multifrequency bioimpedance could detect differences in fluid distribution in the arms with haemodialysis in patients with different vascular access modalities. We audited the change in extracellular water (ECW) and total body water (TBW) in the arms following haemodialysis in 100 patients attending for routine outpatient haemodialysis at a university centre by multifrequency bioimpedance using an eight-electrode contact technique. Patients with fistulae had greater ECW/TBW % in the fistula arm both prior to and post dialysis compared with central venous catheter (CVC) (pre 38.9 ± 0.1 vs 38.3 ± 0.1 and post 38.4 ± 0.1 vs 37.8 ± 0.1, P < 0.01), with a greater absolute difference between arms (0.53 ± 0.01 vs 0.05 ± 0.01, P < 0.01) and greater arm ECW/TBW % compared with total body ECW/TBW % predialysis (forearm fistula 99.4 ± 0.4 vs CVC 97.2 ± 0.3, P < 0.01). Absolute and also relative extracellular fluid volumes are increased in the fistula arm of haemodialysis patients. Thus, if algorithms are to be developed to monitor relative segmental changes in extracellular volumes to help prevent intradialytic hypotension using bioimpedance, then the dialysis vascular access and site will have to be considered, particularly if using relative changes in the upper limbs. Thus, alterative sites which are not so affected by vascular access, such as the calf, may prove advantageous.
    Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 01/2011; 26(1):227-31. · 3.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Residual renal function is a major survival determinant for peritoneal dialysis patients. Hypovolemia can cause acute kidney injury and loss of residual renal function, and it has been suggested that patients receiving peritoneal dialysis should preferably be maintained hypervolemic to preserve residual renal function. Here we determined whether hydration status predicted long-term changes in residual renal function. Changes in residual renal function and extracellular water (ECW) to total body water (TBW) measured by multifrequency bioimpedance in 237 adult patients who had paired baseline and serial 12 monthly measurements were examined. Baseline hydration status (ECW/TBW) was not significantly associated with preservation of residual renal function, unlike baseline and follow-up mean arterial blood pressure. When the cohort was split into tertiles according to baseline hydration status, there was no significant correlation seen between change in hydration status and subsequent loss in residual renal function. Increased ECW/TBW in peritoneal dialysis patients was not associated with preservation of residual renal function. Similarly, increments and decrements in ECW/TBW were not associated with preservation or reduction in residual renal function. Thus, our study does not support the view that overhydration preserves residual renal function and such a policy risks the consequences of persistent hypervolemia.Kidney International advance online publication, 24 July 2013; doi:10.1038/ki.2013.273.
    Kidney International 07/2013; · 8.52 Impact Factor