Article

Medicaid Managed Care and Health Care Access for Adult Beneficiaries with Disabilities

Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Health Services Research (Impact Factor: 2.49). 06/2009; 44(5 Pt 1):1521-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00991.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the impact of Medicaid managed care organizations (MCO) on health care access for adults with disabilities (AWDs).
Mandatory and voluntary enrollment data for AWDs in Medicaid MCOs in each county were merged with the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and the Area Resource File for 1996-2004.
I use logit regression and two evaluation perspectives to compare access and preventive care for AWDs in Medicaid MCOs with FFS. From the state's perspective, I compare AWDs in counties with mandatory, voluntary, and no MCOs. From the enrollee's perspective, I compare AWDs who must enroll in an MCO or FFS to those who may choose between them.
Mandatory MCO enrollees are 24.9 percent more likely to wait >30 minutes to see a provider, 32 percent more likely to report a problem accessing a specialist, and 10 percent less likely to receive a flu shot within the past year. These differences persist from the state evaluation perspective.
States should not expect a dramatic change in health care access when they implement Medicaid MCOs to deliver care to the adult disabled population. However, continued attention to specialty care access is warranted for mandatory MCO enrollees.

0 Followers
 · 
84 Views
  • Source
    • "Of 61 million total Medicaid beneficiaries in the United States, almost 15% are PWD (U.S. Census Bureau, Administrative and Customer Services Division, Statistical Compendia Branch, 2011). Because PWD often require a great need for specialized services, many states have implemented managed care arrangements to control Medicaid spending effectively and improve quality and access to care (Burns, 2009; Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, 2012). Despite access to health care via Medicaid and Medicaid managed care, barriers to accessible health care persist for PWD. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: People with disabilities (PWD) are more likely than those without disabilities to experience barriers when accessing healthcare, often leading to unmet needs. The chasm between what providers perceive as adequate care for PWD and the actual health care needs as perceived by PWD remains significant. Using data from 360 health care providers and 540 Medicaid eligible PWD, we compared perceived barriers to care faced by PWD from the perspective of both providers and PWD. Our results indicated major variations in provider and PWD perceptions about barriers to care. PWD and providers both perceived transportation issues as the highest ranked barriers and physical access issues as the lowest ranked barriers. Multivariate results indicated that PWD reported barriers when communicating with providers, although providers did not consider communication as a major barrier. Among PWD, those with multiple types of disabilities were more likely to experience barriers when communicating with providers compared with other PWD. In addition, providers considered insurance a barrier to care, although this was not the perception of PWD. Particularly in the era of health care reform, policy responses to these findings should address the specific needs of people with different types of disabling conditions rather than assuming all PWD face similar challenges in accessing and utilizing health care.
    Journal of Disability Policy Studies 11/2012; 25(3). DOI:10.1177/1044207312469829
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this review was to evaluate the impact of managed care on publicly insured children with special health care needs (CSHCN). We conducted a review of the extant literature. Using a formal computerized search, with search terms reflecting 7 specific outcome categories, we summarized study findings and study quality. We identified 13 peer-reviewed articles that evaluated the impact of Medicaid and State Children's Health Insurance program (SCHIP) Managed Care (MSMC) on health services delivery to populations of CSHCN, with all studies observational in design. Considered in total, the available scientific evidence is varied. Findings concerning care access demonstrate a positive effect of MSMC; findings concerning care utilization were mixed. Little information was identified concerning health care quality, satisfaction, costs, or health status, whereas no study yielded evidence on family impact. The available studies suggest that the evaluated record of MSMC for CSHCN has been mixed, with considerable heterogeneity in the definition of CSHCN, program design, and measured outcomes. These findings suggest caution should be exercised in implementing MSMC for CSHCN and that greater emphasis on health outcomes and cost evaluations is warranted.
    Academic pediatrics 01/2010; 10(1):48-55. DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2009.09.007 · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: States have increasingly used Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) to provide medical services to the Medicaid population. However, the effects of these initiatives on total health-care expenses, the mix of utilization, and access to care remain unclear. We examine the effect of changes in Medicaid HMO penetration between 1996 and 2002 on these outcomes using data for the nonelderly Medicaid population in the Community Tracking Study's Household Survey. We develop market-level measures of Medicaid HMO penetration from CMS and InterStudy data, distinguish whether the HMOs specialize in serving the Medicaid population, and use a market fixed-effects model to focus on changes in HMO penetration rates over time. Although limited by imprecise estimates, we find some evidence that utilization and access are related to the market penetration rates of commercial and Medicaid-dominant HMOs, but the pattern of results we observe does not appear to be consistent with welfare improvements.
    Health Economics 04/2011; 20(4):446-60. DOI:10.1002/hec.1602 · 2.14 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview

Download
1 Download
Available from