Prefrontal cortex and cognitive control: Motivating functional hierarchies

Nature Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 16.1). 08/2009; 12(7):821-2. DOI: 10.1038/nn0709-821
Source: PubMed


How different frontal brain regions contribute to goal-directed behavior is not fully understood. A study now suggests a parallel functional architecture in medial and lateral prefrontal cortex for motivating and selecting behavior.

Download full-text


Available from: Tobias Egner, Oct 04, 2015
56 Reads
  • Source
    • "The monitoring attentional system, important for the phenomenon we observed, represented by the ACC [Posner and Reichle, 1994], serves to ensure that the elaboration processes in other brain regions are of the highest efficiency, in relation to the demands of the tasks that are taking place. It is proposed that activity in the dACC signals the need for increased cognitive control [Ridderinkhof et al., 2004a, b] and interactions between the dACC and lateral prefrontal structures implement subsequent behavioral changes [Egner, 2009; Kouneiher et al., 2009; Ridderinkhof et al., 2004a, b]. The midcingulate comprises different subareas with a complex pattern of connection with limbic structures and appears to be important for the integration of emotional and cognitive processes and vegetative activity [Damasio, 1994; Devinsky et al., 1995; Ong€ ur and Price, 2000]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The anticipation of pain has been investigated in a variety of brain imaging studies. Importantly, today there is no clear overall picture of the areas that are involved in different studies and the exact role of these regions in pain expectation remains especially unexploited. To address this issue, we used activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis to analyze pain anticipation in several neuroimaging studies. A total of 19 functional magnetic resonance imaging were included in the analysis to search for the cortical areas involved in pain anticipation in human experimental models. During anticipation, activated foci were found in the dorsolateral prefrontal, midcingulate and anterior insula cortices, medial and inferior frontal gyri, inferior parietal lobule, middle and superior temporal gyrus, thalamus, and caudate. Deactivated foci were found in the anterior cingulate, superior frontal gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus and in the claustrum. The results of the meta-analytic connectivity analysis provide an overall view of the brain responses triggered by the anticipation of a noxious stimulus. Such a highly distributed perceptual set of self-regulation may prime brain regions to process information where emotion, action and perception as well as their related subcategories play a central role. Not only do these findings provide important information on the neural events when anticipating pain, but also they may give a perspective into nocebo responses, whereby negative expectations may lead to pain worsening. Hum Brain Mapp, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Human Brain Mapping 12/2014; 36(5). DOI:10.1002/hbm.22727 · 5.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Koechlin et al. suggest two forms of control; contextual and episodic control (Koechlin et al., 2003; Koechlin and Summerfield, 2007). Contextual control refers to the use of a current cue (context) for selecting task appropriate behavior whereas episodic control, refers to the use of past cues that determine, for an extended period of time the way that current stimuli and contextual cues are interpreted (Egner, 2009). The modes of control are arranged hierarchically whereby episodic control affects contextual control, but not vice versa. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study of uncertainty in decision-making is receiving greater attention in the fields of cognitive and computational neuroscience. Several lines of evidence are beginning to elucidate different variants of uncertainty. Particularly, risk, ambiguity, and expected and unexpected forms of uncertainty are well articulated in the literature. In this article we review both empirical and theoretical evidence arguing for the potential distinction between three forms of uncertainty; expected uncertainty, unexpected uncertainty, and volatility. Particular attention will be devoted to exploring the distinction between unexpected uncertainty and volatility which has been less appreciated in the literature. This includes evidence mainly from neuroimaging, neuromodulation, and electrophysiological studies. We further address the possible differentiation of cognitive control mechanisms used to deal with these forms of uncertainty. Finally, we explore whether the dual modes of control theory provides a theoretical framework for understanding the distinction between unexpected uncertainty and volatility.
    Frontiers in Neuroscience 06/2012; 6:85. DOI:10.3389/fnins.2012.00085 · 3.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Though these methods are largely agnostic about the directionality of these interactions, the findings of Kouneiher and colleagues suggests that the medial frontal regions may regulate the cognitive control resources in the lateral regions according to motivational incentives (Kouneiher et al., 2009). Therefore, we speculate that dmPFC exerts a regulatory or modulatory influence on dlPFC (Wood and Grafman, 2003; Egner, 2009; Kouneiher et al., 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Complex economic decisions - whether investing money for retirement or purchasing some new electronic gadget - often involve uncertainty about the likely consequences of our choices. Critical for resolving that uncertainty are strategic meta-decision processes, which allow people to simplify complex decision problems, evaluate outcomes against a variety of contexts, and flexibly match behavior to changes in the environment. In recent years, substantial research has implicated the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) in the flexible control of behavior. However, nearly all such evidence comes from paradigms involving executive function or response selection, not complex decision-making. Here, we review evidence that demonstrates that the dmPFC contributes to strategic control in complex decision-making. This region contains a functional topography such that the posterior dmPFC supports response-related control, whereas the anterior dmPFC supports strategic control. Activation in the anterior dmPFC signals changes in how a decision problem is represented, which in turn can shape computational processes elsewhere in the brain. Based on these findings, we argue for both generalized contributions of the dmPFC to cognitive control, and specific computational roles for its subregions depending upon the task demands and context. We also contend that these strategic considerations are likely to be critical for decision-making in other domains, including interpersonal interactions in social settings.
    European Journal of Neuroscience 04/2012; 35(7):1075-82. DOI:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08009.x · 3.18 Impact Factor
Show more