Article

Internal medicine clerkship characteristics associated with enhanced student examination performance.

University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges (Impact Factor: 2.34). 08/2009; 84(7):895-901. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a82013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine which internal medicine (IM) clerkship characteristics are associated with better student examination performance.
The authors collected data from 17 U.S. medical schools (1,817 students) regarding characteristics of their IM clerkships, including structural characteristics, pedagogical approaches, patient contact, and clinical teacher characteristics. Outcomes of interest were postclerkship National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) subject examination score, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) 2 score, and change in score from USMLE 1 to 2. To examine how associations of various clerkship characteristics and examination performance may differ for students of different prior achievement, the authors categorized students into those who scored in the top (1/4) of the cohort on USMLE 1 and the bottom (1/4). The authors conducted analyses at both the school and the individual student levels.
In school-level analyses (using a reduced four-variable model), independent variables associated with higher NBME subject examination score were more small-group hours/week and use of community-based preceptors. Greater score increase from USMLE 1 to 2 was associated with students caring for more patients/day. Several variables were associated with enhanced student examination performance at the student level. The most consistent finding was that more patients cared for per day was associated with higher examination performance. More structured learning activities were associated with higher examination scores for students with lower baseline USMLE 1 achievement.
Certain clerkship characteristics are associated with better student examination performance, the most salient being caring for more patients per day.

1 Bookmark
 · 
88 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Most medical schools in the United States use the National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Examinations as a method of at least partial assessment of student performance, yet there is still uncertainty of how well these examination scores correlate with clinical proficiency. Thus, we investigated which factors in a surgery clerkship curriculum have a positive effect on academic achievement on the National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Examination in Surgery. Design A retrospective analysis of 83 third-year medical students at our institution with 4 unique clinical experiences on the general surgery clerkship for the 2007-2008 academic year was conducted. Records of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores, National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Examination in Surgery scores, and essay examination scores for the groups were compared using 1-way analysis of variance testing. Setting Rush University Medical Center, Chicago IL, an academic institution and tertiary care center. Results Our data demonstrated National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Examination in Surgery scores from the group with the heavier clinical loads and least time for self-study were statistically higher than the group with lighter clinical services and higher rated self-study time (p = 0.036). However, there was no statistical difference of National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Examination in Surgery scores between the groups with equal clinical loads (p = 0.751). Conclusions Students experiencing higher clinical volumes on surgical services, but less self-study time demonstrated statistically higher academic performance on objective evaluation, suggesting clinical experience may be of higher value than self-study and reading.
    Journal of Surgical Education 01/2013; · 1.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective. To determine whether sequential assignment of students to the same facility for institutional practice experiences improves their advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) examination scores. Design. Student volunteers were assigned to the same healthcare facility for all institutional introductory pharmacy practice experiences (IPPEs) and advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). Other students completed institutional IPPEs and APPEs at separate healthcare facilities, ranging from 2 to 4 different facilities per student. APPE examination scores of students assigned to the same facility for all institutional learning experiences were compared with those of students assigned to more than 1 institutional practice site. Assessment. Holding grade point average constant, students assigned to the same facility for institutional IPPEs and APPEs scored 3 percentage points higher on the APPE institutional examination compared with students assigned to separate facilities for these experiences. Conclusion. Assigning students to the same facility for both institutional IPPEs and APPEs positively influenced knowledge-based APPE examination performance.
    American journal of pharmaceutical education 04/2014; 78(3):60. · 1.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medical students in surgical clerkships must gain surgical knowledge while doing clinical rotations. We developed a self-learning program, which is case based, the Case Review Question (CRQ) system. Our hypothesis was that students who used CRQs would score higher on the summative test, Surgery NBME (National Board of Medical Examiners). The setting is a surgical clerkship in a Liaison Council for Medical Education (LCME) approved Medical School, with summative examination using the NBME shelf examination in Surgery. Each CRQ document is a series of 20 to 25 questions based on cases. The cases are a paragraph, with pertinent medical facts and extra facts as distracters. The students are encouraged to use these questions to guide study. Students must come to a review session to hear the answers and a discussion. We review the NBME Surgery shelf examination scores taken before and after this program was initiated, along with changes in rotation group size, call schedule type, and other changes. CRQs, review sessions, and call schedule changes improved scores. NBME examination average rose from 77.12 to 82.01 (p = 0.004) after the CRQ program was initiated. Call schedule revision improved scores: intermittent call NBME score was 80.98, whereas night float schedule mean NBME was 84.66 (p < 0.001). During night float call, the CRQ program was already in effect, so that there is no non-CRQ program comparison group. Students scored higher in the second semester, throughout the study. First semester students scored a mean of 79.11, whereas second semester students scored 84.195 (p < 0.001). By the end of the study, there were no failures on the NBME examination, even in the first semester. The factors of presence of the CRQ program, review sessions, call schedule type, and which semester were all significant in a correlation matrix against NBME scores and in a regression analysis (p < 0.001). The CRQ program of case-based self-study was associated with higher scores on the NBME shelf examination, as a summative test of medical knowledge in surgery.
    Journal of Surgical Education 01/2013; 70(1):68-75. · 1.07 Impact Factor