Group health cooperative's transformation toward patient-centered access.

Center for Health Studies, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Medical Care Research and Review (Impact Factor: 2.57). 07/2009; 66(6):703-24. DOI: 10.1177/1077558709338486
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Institute of Medicine suggests redesigning health care to ensure safe, effective, timely, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care. The concept of patient-centered access supports these goals. Group Health, a mixed-model health care system, attempted to improve patients' access to care through the following changes: (a) offering a patient Web site with patient access to patient-physician secure e-mail, electronic medical records, and health promotion information; (b) offering advanced access to primary physicians; (c) redesigning primary care services to enhance care efficiency; (d) offering direct access to physician specialists; and (e) aligning primary physician compensation through incentives for patient satisfaction, productivity, and secure messaging with patients. In the 2 years following the redesign, patients reported higher satisfaction with certain aspects of access to care, providers reported improvements in the quality of service given to patients, and enrollment in Group Health stayed aligned with statewide trends in health care coverage.


Available from: David Grembowski, Feb 04, 2014
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this contribution the web-based portal for healthcare electronic communication is discussed. Authors offer a system design, which reflect a trustworthiness and reliability. The paper deals with system design from the perspective of physicians and offers functional analysis, which is proposed by system design. The construction itself is derived from requirements, which were gathered by literature review. Web-based portals take an ever-more important role in the medical informatics. Electronic information sharing is increasing rapidly as the web is becoming an appropriate ecosystem for medical information portals and information sharing platform. The web is only one of many possible ways of delivering information; in this paper we discuss a position for delivery service portal, which can be used for patients-provider communication [1]. Discussion between medical professionals and academic researchers about the advantages and disadvantages of this approach is ongoing , mainly about if such a system can be trusted. Rauer's [2] investigations indicated that trust in electronic records varies, with patients having a greater tendency to trust them than professionals. The most important advantage [1] of a web-based portal is the possibility of connecting with personal computers at home or in the office. The web platform allows to communication of abroad set of patients and providers, thus for using only spread technology is required. Bashshur [3] describes telemedicine in healthcare. These results should be used for Internet service in general. Kohane et al. [4] describe methods for building an electronic health records system. These findings are useful for an understanding of web technologies in healthcare, but they only describe one part of a web-based portal. Therefore, their research is expanded in this paper and further discussion is engaged. Provider's needs may vary in relatively huge interval terms. There are systems for clinical care, information exchange, and service request functions, whose integration
    Computer Science On-line Conference 2015; 04/2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Information Delivery is one the most important tasks in healthcare practice. This article discusses patient's tasks and perspectives, which are then used to design a new Effective Electronic Methodology. The system design methods applicable to electronic communication in the healthcare sector are also described. The architecture and the methodology for the healthcare service portal are set out in the proposed system design.
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 06/2014; 11(6):6231-6245. DOI:10.3390/ijerph110606231 · 1.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE Telephone- and Internet-based communication are increasingly common in primary care, yet there is uncertainty about how these forms of communication affect demand for in-person office visits. We assessed whether use of copay-free secure messaging and telephone encounters was associated with office visit use in a population with diabetes. METHODS We used an interrupted time series design with a patient-quarter unit of analysis. Secondary data from 2008-2011 spanned 3 periods before, during, and after a patient-centered medical home (PCMH) redesign in an integrated health care delivery system. We used linear regression models to estimate proportional changes in the use of primary care office visits associated with proportional increases in secure messaging and telephone encounters. RESULTS The study included 18,486 adults with diabetes. The mean quarterly number of primary care contacts increased by 28% between the pre-PCMH baseline and the postimplementation periods, largely driven by increased secure messaging; quarterly office visit use declined by 8%. In adjusted regression analysis, 10% increases in secure message threads and telephone encounters were associated with increases of 1.25% (95% CI, 1.21%-1.29%) and 2.74% (95% CI, 2.70%-2.77%) in office visits, respectively. In an interaction model, proportional increases in secure messaging and telephone encounters remained associated with increased office visit use for all study periods and patient subpopulations (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Before and after a medical home redesign, proportional increases in secure messaging and telephone encounters were associated with additional primary care office visits for individuals with diabetes. Our findings provide evidence on how new forms of patient-clinician communication may affect demand for office visits.
    The Annals of Family Medicine 07/2014; 12(4):338-43. DOI:10.1370/afm.1642 · 4.57 Impact Factor