Complicated crown fractures - Management and treatment options

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
International Endodontic Journal (Impact Factor: 2.97). 07/2009; 42(8):740-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01588.x
Source: PubMed


Complicated crown fractures involve enamel, dentine and the pulp. The incidence of complicated crown fractures ranges from 2% to 13% of all dental injuries and the most commonly involved tooth is the maxillary central incisor. Various treatment modalities are available depending upon the clinical, physiological and radiographic status of the involved tooth. The aim of this article was to discuss techniques for the management of complicated crown fractures.
Management of complicated crown fractures depends upon several factors with the result that various clinical modalities have been suggested. Seven case reports of complicated crown fractures are presented and risks/benefits of the treatment plans are discussed.
Proper diagnosis, treatment planning and follow-up care are important factors in the prognosis of complicated crown fractures. Thorough understanding of the available treatment modalities and their specific indications is critical. The risks and benefits of each treatment option should be carefully evaluated during the treatment planning process.

265 Reads
  • Source
    • "When an anterior tooth is fractured at the level of the osseous crest due to severe dental caries or trauma, a clinician can be confronted with a dilemma in choosing the best treatment among the various options with respect to prognosis and esthetics.1,2 In such cases, surgical extraction followed by an implant restoration or fixed prostheses can be considered. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Orthodontic extrusion is usually performed by means of a fixed orthodontic appliance that utilizes arch wire attached to adjacent teeth and transfers the desired force by elastic from the wire to the root. However, clinicians often encounter cases where the bonding required for tooth traction is not possible because the adjacent teeth have been restored with ceramic or veneer. The purpose of this case report is to describe a modified orthodontic extrusion appliance that is useful when conventional orthodontic treatment is not possible. The modified appliance was fabricated using an artificial tooth, clear plastic sheeting, and a braided fiber-reinforced composite strip that covered adjacent teeth without bonding. It satisfied the esthetic and functional needs of the patient and established the optimal biologic width.
    08/2014; 39(3):226-9. DOI:10.5395/rde.2014.39.3.226
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AIM: To collect and assess the contemporary data referring to orthodontic movement of endodontically treated teeth.METHOD: Relevant original and review articles were retrieved from PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases, until February 2010. RESULTS: Endodontically treated teeth can be moved equally well to vital teeth and for the same distances, without more frequent adverse consequences. They present a smaller degree of apical resorption in mean values compared to vital teeth, however this difference is not regarded to be statistically or clinically significant. Root resorption seems to be related more to the severity of trauma and the stage of root development rather than orthodontic or surgical manipulations. The obturating material of choice in the event of endodontic treatment of teeth with incomplete apex as well as in cases of teeth with complete apex under orthodontic movement, seems to be Ca(OH)2, because of the evidence based action of Ca(OH)2 against the frequently observed root resorption. In cases of fractures, a 12 month waiting period is suggested before the start of orthodontic treatment, while in cases with no radiographic findings treatment can begin relatively immediately. CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic movement of endodontically treated teeth is feasible without negative consequences to the apex. Orthodontic treatment prognosis of endodontically treated teeth depends on the type, the severity and the timing of trauma, as well as the management of the case by the team of therapists.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance and fracture mode of endodontically treated teeth with wide root canals restored with various dowel methods. Fifty human uniradicular mandibular premolar teeth were decoronated and endodontically treated. The canals were widened with diamond points. The specimens were divided into five groups on the basis of type of dowel method used: conventional custom-made cast metal dowel; single glass fiber-reinforced resin dowel; glass fiber-reinforced resin dowel with accessory fiber dowels; relined glass fiber-reinforced resin dowel; and dowels formed with the help of polyethylene fiber ribbon-reinforced resin composite. Specimens were restored with indirect composite crowns, and 150,000 cycles of cyclic loading were applied. The specimens were loaded to test the fracture resistance and fracture mode (repairable and nonrepairable). The cast metal dowel groups had the highest fracture resistance but showed nonrepairable fracture in 90% of specimens. Cast metal dowels had the highest fracture resistance but led to nonrepairable fracture while restoring the wide root canals under cyclic loading. Specimens restored with fiber dowels, accessory dowels, relined dowels, and ribbon-reinforced resin provided adequate fracture resistance with increased incidence of repairable fractures.
    Journal of Prosthodontics 02/2012; 21(4):312-6. DOI:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00827.x · 1.07 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications

Preview (2 Sources)

265 Reads
Available from