Effects of bedrest 1: cardiovascular, respiratory and haematological systems.

School of Health Science, Swansea University.
Nursing times 01/2009; 105(21):16-20.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This is the first in a three-part series on the physiological effects of bedrest. It discusses what happens to the cardiovascular, respiratory and haematological systems when a person is bedridden. Other articles in the series will cover the effects of immobility on the digestive, endocrine, renal, nervous, immune and musculoskeletal systems and will examine the effects of bedrest on the skin.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bed rest as a therapy can be traced back to Hippocrates and has been used for many types of illnesses since then. It is still commonly used as an intervention in pregnancy despite known physiological and psychological side effects. Some historical and social reasons why nurses and other health care providers are slow to change practice are provided. Evidence from randomized trials is urgently needed to support or refute the use of bed rest in pregnancy.
    Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing 09/2004; 33(5):542-9. DOI:10.1177/0884217504268523 · 1.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute confusion is a major problem for a large number of orthopaedic patients, particularly older adults. Using a qualitative methodology, this exploratory study examined the experiences of orthopaedic nurses caring for acutely confused elderly patients. Analysis of interviews with ten orthopaedic nurses yielded a thematic framework that was used to code and categorize the data. Nurses determined acute confusion on the basis of observation of patients' behaviours, functioning and orientation as well as their knowledge of factors that predispose patients to the development of acute confusion. No standardized assessment tool or systematic assessment format was used. Once confusion was detected, nurses looked for possible causes. Interventions used by nurses included: constant surveillance, elimination of underlying causes, reorientation strategies, and caring human interactions. For those patients who were disruptive, three additional interventions: sitters, medications and restraints were used. Interviews revealed that acute confusion had far-reaching effects on nurses, patients, room-mates and families. Caring for acutely confused patients increased the nurses' workload, threatened their safety, affected their self-esteem and created mental conflicts.
    Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing 02/2002; 6(1):9-17. DOI:10.1054/joon.2001.0210
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To inform the debate over whether human sleep can be chronically reduced without consequences, we conducted a dose-response chronic sleep restriction experiment in which waking neurobehavioral and sleep physiological functions were monitored and compared to those for total sleep deprivation. The chronic sleep restriction experiment involved randomization to one of three sleep doses (4 h, 6 h, or 8 h time in bed per night), which were maintained for 14 consecutive days. The total sleep deprivation experiment involved 3 nights without sleep (0 h time in bed). Each study also involved 3 baseline (pre-deprivation) days and 3 recovery days. Both experiments were conducted under standardized laboratory conditions with continuous behavioral, physiological and medical monitoring. A total of n = 48 healthy adults (ages 21-38) participated in the experiments. Noctumal sleep periods were restricted to 8 h, 6 h or 4 h per day for 14 days, or to 0 h for 3 days. All other sleep was prohibited. Chronic restriction of sleep periods to 4 h or 6 h per night over 14 consecutive days resulted in significant cumulative, dose-dependent deficits in cognitive performance on all tasks. Subjective sleepiness ratings showed an acute response to sleep restriction but only small further increases on subsequent days, and did not significantly differentiate the 6 h and 4 h conditions. Polysomnographic variables and delta power in the non-REM sleep EEG-a putative marker of sleep homeostasis--displayed an acute response to sleep restriction with negligible further changes across the 14 restricted nights. Comparison of chronic sleep restriction to total sleep deprivation showed that the latter resulted in disproportionately large waking neurobehavioral and sleep delta power responses relative to how much sleep was lost. A statistical model revealed that, regardless of the mode of sleep deprivation, lapses in behavioral alertness were near-linearly related to the cumulative duration of wakefulness in excess of 15.84 h (s.e. 0.73 h). Since chronic restriction of sleep to 6 h or less per night produced cognitive performance deficits equivalent to up to 2 nights of total sleep deprivation, it appears that even relatively moderate sleep restriction can seriously impair waking neurobehavioral functions in healthy adults. Sleepiness ratings suggest that subjects were largely unaware of these increasing cognitive deficits, which may explain why the impact of chronic sleep restriction on waking cognitive functions is often assumed to be benign. Physiological sleep responses to chronic restriction did not mirror waking neurobehavioral responses, but cumulative wakefulness in excess of a 15.84 h predicted performance lapses across all four experimental conditions. This suggests that sleep debt is perhaps best understood as resulting in additional wakefulness that has a neurobiological "cost" which accumulates over time.
    Sleep 04/2003; 26(2):117-26. · 5.06 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 1, 2014