Recommendations for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Update

College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois, United States
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (Impact Factor: 2.84). 02/2007; 131(1):18-43. DOI: 10.1043/1543-2165(2007)131[18:ASOCCO]2.0.CO;2
Source: PubMed


To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing and its utility as a predictive marker in invasive breast cancer.

ASCO/CAP convened an Update Committee that included coauthors of the 2007 guideline to conduct a systematic literature review and update recommendations for optimal HER2 testing.

The Update Committee identified criteria and areas requiring clarification to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH). The guideline was reviewed and approved by both organizations.

The Update Committee recommends that HER2 status (HER2 negative or positive) be determined in all patients with invasive (early stage or recurrence) breast cancer on the basis of one or more HER2 test results (negative, equivocal, or positive). Testing criteria define HER2-positive status when (on observing within an area of tumor that amounts to >10% of contiguous and homogeneous tumor cells) there is evidence of protein overexpression (IHC) or gene amplification (HER2 copy number or HER2/CEP17 ratio by ISH based on counting at least 20 cells within the area). If results are equivocal (revised criteria), reflex testing should be performed using an alternative assay (IHC or ISH). Repeat testing should be considered if results seem discordant with other histopathologic findings. Laboratories should demonstrate high concordance with a validated HER2 test on a sufficiently large and representative set of specimens. Testing must be performed in a laboratory accredited by CAP or another accrediting entity. The Update Committee urges providers and health systems to cooperate to ensure the highest quality testing.

Download full-text


Available from: Elizabeth Hale Hammond, Sep 23, 2015
64 Reads
  • Source
    • "Classification of breast cancers by immunohis- tochimestry HER2 immunostaining were considered positive as described in the Guideline of College of American Pathologists and controlled by a FISH technique for all cases (HercepTest ® Dako) [31]. ER and PR were subsequently scored using a score consisting to sum the intensity and proportion of the nuclear immunostaining. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Triple-negative breast carcinoma (TN) is a heterogeneous cancer type expressing EGFR in 75% of cases. MUC1 is a large type I sialylated glycoprotein comprising two subunits (α and β chains, also called respectively MUC1-VNTR and MUC1-CT), which was found to regulate EGFR activity through endocytic internalisation. Endocytosis and autophagy use the lysosome pathway involving NEU1. Recently, a molecular EGFR-MUC1-NEU1 complex was suggested to play a role in EGFR pathway. In the aim to understand the relationship between EGFR-MUC1-NEU1 complex and autophagy in breast carcinoma, we compared triple negative (TN) showing a high-EGFR expression with luminal (LUM) presenting low-EGFR level. We studied the expression of MUC1-VNTR, MUC1-CT and NEU1 in comparison with those of two molecular actors of autophagy, PI3K (p110β) and Beclin1. A total of 87 breast cancers were split in two groups following the immunohistochemical classification of breast carcinoma: 48 TN and 39 LUM. Our results showed that TN presented a high expression of EGFR and a low expression of MUC1-VNTR, MUC1-CT, NEU1, Beclin-1 and PI3Kp110β. Moreover, in TN, a positive statistical correlation was observed between Beclin-1 or PI3Kp110β and MUC1-VNTR or NEU1, but not with EGFR. In conclusion, our data suggest that autophagy is reduced in TN leading likely to the deregulation of EGFR-MUC1-NEU1 complex and its associated cellular pathways.
    International journal of clinical and experimental pathology 07/2015; 8(5):4344-55. · 1.89 Impact Factor
    • "Diagnoses were made according to the recommendations of the World Health Organization classification for Tumours of the Breast (2012) and were confirmed by two experienced pathologists (HP.S., M.K.) with specific expertise in breast histopathology. All tumours were characterised as oestrogen receptor (ER) negative, progesterone receptor (PR) negative, both using a cutoff of 1% positive tumour cells (Hammond et al., 2010), and HER2 negative according to current guidelines (Wolff et al., 2007). All the cases had complete surgical resection of the primary tumour and surgical assessment of the axillary lymph nodes. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a group of very aggressive breast tumours, characterized by lack of expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2/HER2). Nevertheless, TNBCs show different clinical characteristics and are very diverse regarding prognostic outcome. So far, only a few prognostic markers for TNBC have been reported that could be helpful for therapeutic stratification. Here we have analysed the expression of S100P and HYAL2 using immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a TNBC cohort of 98 patients with a follow-up for recurrence and death. TNBC patients with high expression of both proteins showed significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (mean PFS = 35.9 months, P = 0.001) compared to TNBC patients with high expression levels of only one of the proteins (mean PFS = 69.4 months) and to TNBC patients with low expression of both proteins (mean PFS = 83.3 months). Moreover, multivariate Cox-regression model showed the combined expression of S100P and HYAL2 as independent prognostic factor for PFS (P = 0.001). The expression of S100P and HYAL2 indicated similar prognostic effect to the overall survival (OS) of TNBC patients. In addition, high expression levels of both S100P and HYAL2 showed significant association with different clinicopathological characteristics, such as more recurrence events (P = 0.004), and higher occurrence of metastasis (P = 0.002). Our study proposes S100P and HYAL2 as potential prognostic markers for TNBC. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Experimental and Molecular Pathology 06/2015; 99(1). DOI:10.1016/j.yexmp.2015.06.010 · 2.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Moreover, the development of detection systems can definitely involve researches to find a new medicine candidate for a cancer treatment. Among biomarkers, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is a transmembrane glycoprotein on cell membrane, has considerable attentions as one of the effective cancer biomarkers in recent researches [6] [7] [8]. The high EGFR expression level have quite been discovered in tumor progression [9] [10] [11] [12] [13], cancer cell proliferation and metastatic phenotype [14] [15] [16]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We developed a capacitance sensor with parallel plate geometry to measure epithermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression levels on cell membrane in real-time. We first proved correlations between capacitance changes and cell numbers settled down between electrodes, and then observed capacitance changes elicited by interactions between EGFR on membrane and EGF proteins in real time. Consequently, we confirmed that the EGFR expression levels of varied typed cells were successfully quantified. This approach can effectively distinguish differences of EGFR levels of cancer cells and normal cells in real-time. Also, up to 600% sensitivity enhancements and around 2.2 h on average sensing time saving were achieved by using the capacitance sensor over a conventional immunoassay technique. Such a capacitance biosensor can be extended to broad fields where the receptor–antibody reactions, the receptor–virus reactions or DNA hybridizations are involved.
    Sensors and Actuators B Chemical 03/2015; 209. DOI:10.1016/j.snb.2014.12.001 · 4.10 Impact Factor
Show more