Article

Pesticide use and adult-onset asthma among male farmers in the Agricultural Health Study

Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Epidemiology Branch, MD A3-05, PO Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2233, USA.
European Respiratory Journal (Impact Factor: 7.13). 07/2009; 34(6):1296-303. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00005509
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although specific pesticides have been associated with wheeze in farmers, little is known about pesticides and asthma. Data from 19,704 male farmers in the Agricultural Health Study were used to evaluate lifetime use of 48 pesticides and prevalent adult-onset asthma, defined as doctor-diagnosed asthma after the age of 20 yrs. Asthma cases were categorised as allergic (n = 127) and nonallergic (n = 314) based on their history of eczema or hay fever. Polytomous logistic regression, controlling for age, state, smoking and body mass, was used to assess pesticide associations. High pesticide exposure events were associated with a doubling of both allergic and nonallergic asthma. For ever-use, 12 individual pesticides were associated with allergic asthma and four with nonallergic asthma. For allergic asthma, coumaphos (OR 2.34; 95% CI 1.49-3.70), heptachlor (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.30-3.11), parathion (OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.21-3.46), 80/20 mix (carbon tetrachloride/carbon disulfide) (OR 2.15; 95% CI 1.23-3.76) and ethylene dibromide (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.02-4.20) all showed ORs of >2.0 and significant exposure-response trends. For nonallergic asthma, DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) showed the strongest association (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.09-1.84), but with little evidence of increasing asthma with increasing use. Current animal handling and farm activities did not confound these results. There was little evidence that allergy alone was driving these associations. In conclusion, pesticides may be an overlooked contributor to asthma risk among farmers.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Joseph Coble, Jun 18, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
83 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Few studies have investigated asthma and pesticides among women farm workers in developing countries.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the association between pesticides and asthma among rural women (n = 211). Outcome measurements included respiratory symptoms (European Community Respiratory Health Survey questionnaire), immunological status (Phadiatop, serum IgE to mite allergens) and lower airway inflammation (fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels). Exposure variables included self-reported pesticide exposure and whole blood cholinesterase (ChE).ResultsThe prevalence of ocular-nasal symptoms (ONS), doctor-diagnosed asthma and current asthma was 24%, 11%, and 6% respectively. ONS was positively associated with re-entering a sprayed field (OR = 2.97; CI: 0.93–9.50). Asthma symptom score was associated with low ChE (OR = 1.93; CI: 1.09–3.44). Participants with high FeNO (>50 ppb) also had an elevated odds of having low ChE (OR = 4.8; CI: 0.80–28.00).Conclusion Pesticide exposure among women farm workers is associated with increased risk of ocular nasal symptoms and an elevated asthma symptom score. Am. J. Ind. Med. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    American Journal of Industrial Medicine 12/2014; 57:1331-1343. DOI:10.1002/ajim.22384 · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective The aim of the current work is to study the influence of indoor respiratory irritants on the course of bronchial asthma. Subjects & methods Thirty-eight asthmatic patients were included in the study. They were subjected to history taking, clinical examination, and PEFR. Then they were asked to answer two questionnaires, the first one includes the investigated indoor irritants and the other detects the level of asthma control. Results There were no statistical significant differences between level of use and level of asthma control, either in uncontrolled or partially controlled asthma. The usual users were significantly more uncontrolled in household chlorine and chlorine for laundry. The usual users of phenol were statistically highly significantly more uncontrolled asthmatics. No significant difference was seen between level of asthma control and level of use in fragrance, incense and perfumes. Conclusion Chlorine and phenol had significantly higher effect on the asthma control level than other respiratory irritants.
    04/2014; 63(2). DOI:10.1016/j.ejcdt.2014.01.005
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The immune system can be the target of many chemicals, with potentially severe adverse effects on the host's health. In Western countries pesticides, together with new and modified patterns of exposure to chemicals, have been implicated in the increasing prevalence of diseases associated with alterations of the immune response, such as hypersensitivity reactions, certain autoimmune diseases and cancers. Xenobiotics may initiate, facilitate or exacerbate pathological immune processes, resulting in immunotoxicity by induction of mutations in genes coding for immunoregulatory factors, modifying immune tolerance and activation pathways. The purpose of this article is to update the evidence of pesticide immunotoxicity. Even if experimental data as well as sporadic human studies indicate that some pesticides can affect the immune system, overall, existing epidemiological studies are inadequate to raise conclusions on the immunotoxic risk associated to pesticide exposure. The available studies on the effects of pesticides on human immune system have several limitations including poor indication on exposure levels, multiple chemical exposures, heterogeneity of the approach, and difficulty in giving a prognostic significance to the slight changes often observed. Further studies are necessary, and they should be preferably carried out through comparison of pre and post-exposure findings in the same group of subjects with a matched control group. Attempt should be made to define the prognostic significance of slight changes often observed. Animal and in vitro studies are also important and necessary to scientifically support epidemiological evidences on pesticide-induced immunotoxicity.
    Toxicology 10/2012; DOI:10.1016/j.tox.2012.10.009 · 3.75 Impact Factor