Do biomaterials cause implant-associated mesenchymal tumors of the breast? Analysis of 8 new cases and review of the literature. Hum Pathol 40(11):1564-1570, Epub 2009 Jun 21

Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles 90048, CA.
Human pathology (Impact Factor: 2.77). 07/2009; 40(11):1564-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.03.020
Source: PubMed


Implant-associated mesenchymal tumors (IAMT) of the breast are rare, and most are fibromatoses. There has been no systematic analysis of IAMT to determine their full histologic spectrum, whether there is an association with implant type or rupture, and if evidence supports a causal or fortuitous relationship between tumor and implant. We, therefore, analyzed all mesenchymal tumors associated with breast implants from our soft tissue consultation database spanning a period from 1989 to 2005. Information regarding location, type, and integrity of implant and its temporal relationship to tumor was recorded. Eight IAMT were identified exclusively in female patients (ages 28-64 years; median, 38 years), all of whom presented with a palpable mass. Tumors developed after placement of either a silicone (n = 7) or saline (n = 1) implant (median, 2 years; range, 1.8-10 years), which was usually inserted for cosmetic purposes (n = 7). All tumors arose in or around the capsule of a grossly intact implant, and in one case, the tumor was confined exclusively to the implant capsule. In patients with silicone implants, silicone granulomas were identified within the capsule and associated neoplasm despite the integrity of the implant. Six cases were fibromatoses; one was a pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma; and one was a fibrosarcoma. None of the patients with fibromatosis was known to have familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or Gardner syndrome, although one had Poland syndrome (aplasia of the thorax). One patient with a sarcoma had received radiation 10 years previously for breast carcinoma. Six patients were treated with local excision, one with a wide excision, and one patient with fibromatosis was treated with medical therapy. Median follow-up was 3.2 years (range, 16-92 months). One of the 5 patients with fibromatosis developed 2 recurrences. Neither of the 2 patients with sarcomas has developed metastasis. No patient has died of disease. We conclude that IAMT comprise 2 distinct groups-fibromatosis and sarcoma. Surgical trauma, perhaps occurring in patients with a predisposition to develop desmoid tumors, could account for fibromatosis in this setting. The causal relationship between implants and sarcomas is difficult to assess given the rarity of these tumors and that some may be radiation induced. However, at present, there is insufficient evidence to claim that they are biomaterial related.

20 Reads
  • Source
    • "The distinction is important clinically, as a de novo ipsilateral breast cancer may be amenable to cure after local treatment, whereas local tumor recurrence following complete surgical excision is almost inevitably followed by the appearance of distant metastases. Other cancers may occur secondary to implant placement, such as mesenchymal tumors and sarcomas [19] (Fig. 12). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective is to review the different types of breast reconstruction following cancer surgery and describe expected imaging appearances and complications seen in the reconstructed breast. Surgical management of breast cancer often entails lumpectomy or mastectomy. When mastectomy is performed, patients often opt for breast reconstruction. Most facilities do not routinely image the reconstructed breast with mammography. However, many of these women are imaged with screening breast MRI for evaluation of the contralateral breast, or they may develop a clinical problem that warrants a diagnostic evaluation with MRI. In this article, we will review the more commonly encountered types of breast reconstruction, which include implants, tranversus rectus abdomnis flap, latissimus dorsi flap, deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, and gluteal flaps. Each of these types of reconstruction has different appearances on MR. We will also discuss potential complications that can be seen in the reconstructed breasts, including fat necrosis and recurrence. Radiologists will better understand the different types of breast reconstruction after mastectomy and their normal imaging appearance on MRI. Radiologists will be more aware of how to recognize complications related to surgery as well as how to determine whether recurrence is present. MAIN MESSAGES: • The different surgical techniques used in breast reconstruction are discussed. • Describes the normal magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the breast after reconstruction. • Identify MR imaging features of benign sequelae and recurrence following breast reconstruction.
    Insights into Imaging 06/2012; 3(3):201-13. DOI:10.1007/s13244-012-0150-7
  • Source
    • "Specific implant-related complications such as abnormal immune response or connective tissue diseases [6] and implant-associated tumors [7] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The First International Breast (Implant) Conference was held by the EAoS® (European Academy of Senology) in cooperation with the German Society of Senology during its 29th annual meeting in Düsseldorf, Germany, on 13 June 2009. Methods It was performed as a whole-day interactive workshop in which the standards of implant surgery within reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery were discussed and defined by telecommunication dialogue voting. Results This article describes the conference results concerning pre- and post-procedural imaging in patients with breast implants. Both before and after augmentation, imaging is mandatory and provides essential information concerning tissue and implant integrity. Whereas mammography is the first-line method before surgery, ultrasound is the mainstay of post-procedural imaging. Cancer screening in augmented breasts generally follows the same guidelines as for non-augmented breasts. Conclusion Whereas agreement about the indications for mammographical and sonographical evaluations is largely unanimous, there was substantial disagreement as far as the application of magnetic resonance imaging is concerned. There is an obvious demand for an evidence-based evaluation of this modality and the implementation of appropriate guidelines.
    Insights into Imaging 05/2010; 1(2):93-97. DOI:10.1007/s13244-010-0021-z
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper describes a new method for pose estimation of a human face moving abruptly in the real world and its hardware implementation for real-time operation. The virtues of this method are the use of very simple calculation, the correlation among multiple model images, and the absence of any facial features such as facial organs, so that it is very robust and can be easily implemented with simple hardware
    Signals, Systems and Computers, 1994. 1994 Conference Record of the Twenty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on; 01/1994
Show more