Opioids for neonates receiving mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy.
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition (Impact Factor: 3.86). 07/2009; 95(4):F241-51. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2008.150318
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the effect of opioid analgesics, compared to placebo, no drug, or other non-opioid analgesics or sedatives, on pain, duration of mechanical ventilation, mortality, growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes in newborn infants on mechanical ventilation.
This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Data sources used were Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases, and references from review articles. RCTs or quasi-RCTs comparing opioids to a control, or to other analgesics or sedatives in newborn infants on mechanical ventilation were reviewed.
A total of 13 studies on 1505 infants were included. Infants given opioids showed reduced Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) scores compared to the control group (weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.71, 95% CI -3.18 to -0.24). Heterogeneity was significantly high in all analyses of pain. Meta-analyses of mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation and long-term and short-term neurodevelopmental outcomes showed no statistically significant differences. Very preterm infants given morphine took significantly longer to reach full enteral feeding than those in control groups (WMD 2.10 days, 95% CI 0.35 to 3.85). One study that compared morphine with midazolam showed similar pain scores, but fewer adverse effects with morphine.
There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine use of opioids in mechanically ventilated newborns. Opioids should be used selectively, when indicated by clinical judgment and evaluation of pain indicators. If sedation is required, morphine is safer than midazolam.

Download full-text


Available from: Roberto Bellu, Feb 12, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: GLUCOSE-6-PHOSPHATASE and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) are both important enzymes; a deficiency of either of these enzymes can cause the infant to have significant or life-threatening symptoms. Glucose-6-phosphatase deficiency is a glycogen-storage disease resulting in hypoglycemia and glycogen buildup in the liver that interferes with fat metabolism. G6PD deficiency is an X-linked hereditary disease resulting in nonimmune hemolytic anemia and jaundice. These two diseases sound so similar but are very, very different.
    Neonatal network: NN 01/2012; 31(1):45-7. DOI:10.1891/0730-0832.31.1.45
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit may experience a myriad of painful procedures and stressful experiences. Pain management for infants requiring mechanical ventilation is complex and challenging especially in the preterm population. Many infants may not receive analgesia, primarily due to the unknown long-term neurodevelopmental effects of morphine exposure on the developing brain. Currently, there is no consensus on how to treat pain related to mechanical ventilation due to conflicting scientific evidence lacks clarity and certainty about the role of morphine in pain in preterm infants. The Advance Practice Neonatal Nurse must make the best use of available information about morphine analgesia for the preterm infant, and use it to guide policy and practice for infants. The Advance Practice Neonatal Nurse must use his/her clinical expertise to judicially balance the risks and benefits of morphine analgesia, when used, and tailor the treatment plan to each infant's specific needs.
    Neonatal network: NN 01/2012; 31(1):21-30. DOI:10.1891/0730-0832.31.1.21
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: THINK BACK TO WHEN YOU first graduated from nursing school. What is your most vivid memory of the orientation to your first nursing job? In particular, do you recall the name of your preceptor and how that person impacted your learning? It seems that most nurses can readily answer these questions, regardless of how much time has passed. The experiences were generally memorable; some positive, although others are not.
    Neonatal network: NN 01/2012; 31(1):39-44. DOI:10.1891/0730-0832.31.1.39