Article

Pubertal administration of DEHP delays puberty, suppresses testosterone production, and inhibits reproductive tract development in male Sprague-Dawley and Long-Evans rats.

Division of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, 505 NW 185th Avenue, Beaverton, Oregon 97006, USA.
Toxicological Sciences (Impact Factor: 4.48). 07/2009; 111(1):163-78. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp129
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although is clear that exposure to high dosage levels of some phthalates delays the onset of puberty in the male rat, it has been hypothesized that low levels of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) accelerate puberty by enhancing testicular androgen synthesis. The current study was designed to determine if the dose response to DEHP was nonmonotonic, as hypothesized. Pubertal administration of DEHP delayed the onset of puberty and reduced androgen-dependent tissue weights in both Long-Evans (LE) and Sprague-Dawley (SD) male rats 300 and 900 mg DEHP/kg/day. These effects were generally of greater magnitude in LE than SD rats. By contrast, alterations in testis histopathology (300 and 900 mg/kg/day) were more severe in SD than in LE rats. Taken together, these results suggest that DEHP may be acting on the pubertal male rat testis via two modes of action; one via the Leydig cells and the other via the Sertoli cells. Treatment with DEHP generally reduced serum testosterone and increased serum luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, demonstrating that the reduction in testosterone was due to the effect of DEHP on the testis and not via an inhibition of LH from hypothalamic-pituitary axis. Testosterone production ex vivo (with and without human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation) was consistently reduced in males at the time of puberty and shortly thereafter. DEHP treatment did not accelerate the age at puberty or enhance testosterone levels at 10 or 100 mg/kg/day in either LE or SD rats, as some have hypothesized. Taken together, these results do not provide any evidence of a nonmonotonic dose response to DEHP during puberty.

Full-text

Available from: Vickie S Wilson, May 28, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
122 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Phthalates are a large group of chemicals, used in plasticizers and industrial solvents, to make them flexible and soluble, especially when these materials are applied in the production of toys, medical equipment and drugs coverings. It seems that phthalates induce multi-organ damage through a number of mechanisms such as oxidative stress via generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, disrupting cell function, and also altering the expression and activity of the most important antioxidant enzymes. In this study, we reviewed the recent publications that evaluated the contribution of oxidative stress in phthalate toxicity. Alteration of antioxidant enzymes such as a reduced SOD (Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase) activity as well as an increased CAT (catalase) function normally occur and can be observed particularly with higher doses of phthalates. Moreover, these compounds decrease GPX (glutathione peroxidase) and GST (glutathione S-transferase) activities. Nevertheless, controversy is found in the levels of cellular antioxidants like SOD showing a reduction in many organs like liver, kidney and reproductive system, whereas its increase has been reported in a few studies. In summary, among various organs, reproductive system seems was affected further by oxidative stress through disruption of spermatogenesis, inducing mitochondrial dysfunction in gonocytes, impairment of cellular redox mechanism, and increasing peroxiredoxin 3 and cycloxygenase 2 levels in spermatocytes. Key words: Biological Markers, Molecular Mechanisms,Oxidative stress, Phthalate, Phthalic acid, Review, Toxicity, Reproductive system
    International Journal of Pharmacology 02/2015; 11(2):95-105. DOI:10.3923/ijp.2015.95.105 · 0.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Plasticizers disrupt animal development via the thyroid hormone axis.•Plasticizers impede with reproduction by reducing mitochondrial cholesterol transport.•Plasticizers also induce cellular stress by increasing fatty acid oxidation.
    General and Comparative Endocrinology 11/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.11.003 · 2.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Phthalate esters are widely used plasticizers that are present in many daily used products. Although some of their reproductive effects have been reported, pubertal development effects from prenatal exposure to phthalates awaits further investigations. A population based birth cohort was established (N=437 at baseline) with maternal exposure to phthalates assessed in urine collected at the third trimester of pregnancy in 2001 and 2002. Their 133 children with prenatal phthalates exposure were followed up for the outcomes of pubertal development by sequential physical examinations at eight and 11 years old in 2009 and 2012. Urinary concentrations of major phthalate metabolites (i.e., mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate [MEHP], mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate [MEHHP], mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate [MEOHP], mono-butyl phthalate [MBP], mono-benzyl phthalate [MBzP], monomethyl phthalate [MMP], and mono-ethyl phthalate [MEP]) were determined using liquid chromatography linked to tandem mass spectrometry. The reproductive development measurements included bone age (for both genders), testicle size (for boys), uterus size, and ovarian volume (for girls). We reported results of 133 children with complete data by applying generalized estimating equations for the repeated continuous outcomes. After controlling for Tanner stage, we detected a significant association between reduced uterus size and increasing phthalate exposure in the 2(nd) tertile relative to the 1st tertile of creatinine-corrected MEHP (B=-0.40; 95% C.I.: -0.73, -0.07, relative to the 1st tertile) and total DEHP (B=-0.39, 95% C.I.:-0.66, -0.01 for the 2nd tertile and B=0.34, 95% C.I.: -0.67, -0.01 for the 3rd tertile, relative to the 1st tertile) with a linear trend among girls. MBzP was also found negatively associated with bone age/chronological age ratio (B=-0.07, 95% CI: -0.13, -0.01 for the 3rd tertile, relative to the 1st tertile) with a linear trend for girls. We found no evidence of an association between phthalate exposure and ovarian volume or testicle size. This analysis suggests phthalate exposure may affect specific pubertal development characteristics in human beings. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up period are warranted. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Environmental Research 11/2014; 136C:324-330. DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.026 · 3.95 Impact Factor