Article

Otoacoustic emission theories and behavioral estimates of human basilar membrane motion are mutually consistent.

Unidad de Audición Computacional y Psicoacústica, Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca, C/Pintor Fernando Gallego 1, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology (Impact Factor: 2.95). 07/2009; 10(4):511-23. DOI:10.1007/s10162-009-0176-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT When two pure tones (or primaries) of slightly different frequencies (f (1) and f (2)) are presented to the ear, new frequency components are generated by nonlinear interaction of the primaries within the cochlea. These new components can be recorded in the ear canal as otoacoustic emissions (OAE). The level of the 2f (1)-f (2) OAE component is known as the distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and is regarded as an indicator of the physiological state of the cochlea. The current view is that maximal level DPOAEs occur for primaries that produce equal excitation at the f (2) cochlear region, but this notion cannot be directly tested in living humans because it is impossible to record their cochlear responses while monitoring their ear canal DPOAE levels. On the other hand, it has been claimed that the temporal masking curve (TMC) method of inferring human basilar membrane responses allows measurement of the levels of equally effective pure tones at any given cochlear site. The assumptions of this behavioral method, however, lack firm physiological support in humans. Here, the TMC method was applied to test the current notion on the conditions that maximize DPOAE levels in humans. DPOAE and TMC results were mutually consistent for frequencies of 1 and 4 kHz and for levels below around 65 dB sound pressure level. This match supports the current view on the generation of maximal level DPOAEs as well as the assumptions of the behavioral TMC method.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
89 Views
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pure-tone air-conduction audiometry (PTA) is the reference clinical test used in Europe and the United States to measure the extent of hearing loss. It is a subjective, behavioral test, which measures thresholds of hearing sensations and perceptions based on patient responses to frequency-specific pure-tone stimuli. PTA can detect hearing problems due to cochlear or retro-cochlear impairment, without identifying the source of the problem. In contrast, cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) detect inner-ear dysfunctions, particularly those involving the outer hair cells sensitive to noise and ototoxicants. Recently, ototoxicants were shown to have an action on the central nuclei driving the middle-ear acoustic reflex. Therefore, a new device, called EchoScan, was conceived to collect and measure performance both in the middle- and inner-ear. Its originality: the use of a battery of DPOAE measurements associated with contra-lateral acoustic stimulation. Changes in DPOAE amplitude due to ageing and gender were incidentally detected and EchoScan was more sensitive than impedancemetry to detect the stapedial reflex. EchoScan can be used both in clinical investigations and in occupational medicine, especially for the auditory follow-up of people exposed to noise or ototoxic agents. EchoScan could be promising to assess early detection in programs to prevent hearing loss.
    Noise and Health 10/2012; 14(60):253-9. · 1.65 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Level-dependent changes in temporal envelope fluctuations in speech and related changes in speech recognition may reveal effects of basilar-membrane nonlinearities. As a result of compression in the basilar-membrane response, the "effective" magnitude of envelope fluctuations may be reduced as speech level increases from lower level (more linear) to mid-level (more compressive) regions. With further increases to a more linear region, speech envelope fluctuations may become more pronounced. To assess these effects, recognition of consonants and key words in sentences was measured as a function of speech level for younger adults with normal hearing. Consonant-vowel syllables and sentences were spectrally degraded using "noise vocoder" processing to maximize perceptual effects of changes to the speech envelope. Broadband noise at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio maintained constant audibility as speech level increased. Results revealed significant increases in scores and envelope-dependent feature transmission from 45 to 60 dB SPL and decreasing scores and feature transmission from 60 to 85 dB SPL. This quadratic pattern, with speech recognition maximized at mid levels and poorer at lower and higher levels, is consistent with a role of cochlear nonlinearities in perception of speech envelope cues.
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 08/2012; · 2.95 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Differentiating the relative importance of the various contributors to the audiometric loss (HL(TOTAL)) of a given hearing impaired listener and frequency region is becoming critical as more specific treatments are being developed. The aim of the present study was to assess the relative contribution of inner (IHC) and outer hair cell (OHC) dysfunction (HL(IHC) and HL(OHC), respectively) to the audiometric loss of patients with mild to moderate cochlear hearing loss. It was assumed that HL(TOTAL) = HL(OHC) + HL(IHC) (all in decibels) and that HL(OHC) may be estimated as the reduction in maximum cochlear gain. It is argued that the latter may be safely estimated from compression threshold shifts of cochlear input/output (I/O) curves relative to normal hearing references. I/O curves were inferred behaviorally using forward masking for 26 test frequencies in 18 hearing impaired listeners. Data suggested that the audiometric loss for six of these 26 test frequencies was consistent with pure OHC dysfunction, one was probably consistent with pure IHC dysfunction, 13 were indicative of mixed IHC and OHC dysfunction, and five were uncertain (one more was excluded from the analysis). HL(OHC) and HL(IHC) contributed on average 60 and 40 %, respectively, to the audiometric loss, but variability was large across cases. Indeed, in some cases, HL(IHC) was up to 63 % of HL(TOTAL), even for moderate losses. The repeatability of the results is assessed using Monte Carlo simulations and potential sources of bias are discussed.
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 04/2012; 13(4):485-504. · 2.95 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from

Enrique A Lopez-Poveda