The role of nurses in improving hospital quality and efficiency: real-world results.

Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.64). 07/2009; 28(4):w625-33. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w625
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Discussions of hospital quality, efficiency, and nursing care often taken place independent of one another. Activities to assure the adequacy and performance of hospital nursing, improve quality, and achieve effective control of hospital costs need to be harmonized. Nurses are critical to the delivery of high-quality, efficient care. Lessons from Magnet program hospitals and hospitals implementing front-line staff-driven performance improvement programs such as Transforming Care at the Bedside illustrate how nurses and staff, supported by leadership, can be actively involved in improving both the quality and the efficiency of hospital care.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Transforming Care at the Bedside (TCAB) project engages frontline health care providers as the leaders of change and improvement efforts in their work environment. This study explored how health care providers and managers from three TCAB units in a university-affiliated health care center perceived the development of their change capacities following their involvement in this program.
    The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 10/2014; · 0.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With the nursing profession continuing to face an array of ethical issues, the article reports the findings of a survey of members of the American Organization of Nurse Executives conducted in 2012 to determine the extent to which nurse leaders at different organization levels perceive var-ious factors in their personal, professional and organizational environments to be helpful in re-solving ethical dilemmas. After their personal values, nurse leaders perceive factors related to their organization to be more helpful than those related to their profession, including, among others, the American Nurses Association Code of Ethics. The two highest rated business-related factors deal with the absence of pressure to compromise one's own ethical standards which sug-gests that one way healthcare organizations can assist nurses and their leaders is by neither expli-citly nor implicitly pressuring them to go against their own ethical values. Other key factors re-lated to the organization include formal organizational factors such as the existence of an ethics committee or a person to whom unethical activity can be reported as well as more informal factors related to organizational climate such as the actions and responsiveness of one's immediate boss, the ability to go beyond one's boss if necessary, the organizational culture, management philoso-phy, and management's communication of appropriate ethical behavior. Comparison of the find-ings of the 2012 survey with those of a similar study conducted in 2000 indicated the four factors perceived as most helpful in both studies were identical with the same rank order and the top-10 factors were identical with some differences in ranking. Further analysis indicated the relative degree of helpfulness of the 17 help factors common to both studies was perceived by responding nurse leaders as quite similar overall. The authors also discuss the implications for the profession and the healthcare industry today and in the future.
    Open Journal of Nursing 09/2014; 4(10):695-704.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article investigates the preferences of student and newly graduated nurses for pecuniary and nonpecuniary aspects of nursing jobs. It is the first study applying methods based on discrete choice experiments to a developed country nursing workforce. It is also the first to focus on the transition through university training and into work. This is particularly important as junior nurses have the lowest retention levels in the profession. We sample 526 individuals from nursing programmes in two Australian universities. Flexible and newly developed models combining heteroscedasticity with unobserved heterogeneity in scale and preference weights are estimated. Overall, salary remains the most important feature in increasing the probability that a job will be selected. ‘Supportive management/staff’ and ‘quality of care’ follow as the most important attributes from a list of 11 nonpecuniary characteristics. However, the subset of new graduates rank ‘supportive management/staff’ above salary increases, emphasizing the importance of a supportive workplace in the transition from university to the workplace. We find substantial preference heterogeneity and some attributes, such as the opportunity for clinical rotations, are found to be attractive to some nurses while seen as negative by others. Nursing retention could be improved by designing different employment packages to appeal to these different tastes.
    Applied Economics 01/2014; 46(9). · 0.46 Impact Factor