Evaluation of AAP guidelines for cholesterol screening in youth: Project HeartBeat!

Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
American journal of preventive medicine (Impact Factor: 4.28). 08/2009; 37(1 Suppl):S71-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.04.008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) criterion for screening for hypercholesterolemia in children is family history of hypercholesterolemia or cardiovascular disease or BMI > or =85th percentile. This paper aims to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of dyslipidemia screening using AAP criteria along with either family history or BMI.
Height, weight, plasma total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, and family history were obtained for 678 children aged 8, 11, and 14 years, enrolled from 1991 to 1993 in Project HeartBeat!. Sensitivity, specificity, and PPV screening of each lipid component using family history alone, BMI > or =85th percentile alone, or family history and/or BMI > or =85th percentile, were calculated using 2008 AAP criteria (total cholesterol, LDL-C, and triglycerides > or =90th percentile; HDL-C <10th percentile).
Sensitivity of detecting abnormal total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglycerides using family history alone ranged from 38% to 43% and significantly increased to 54%-66% using family history and/or BMI. Specificity significantly decreased from approximately 65% to 52%, and there were no notable changes in PPV. In black children, cholesterol screening using the BMI > or =85th percentile criterion had higher sensitivity than when using the family history criterion. In nonblacks, family history and/or BMI > or =85th percentile had greater sensitivity than family history alone.
When the BMI screening criterion was used along with the family history criterion, sensitivity increased, specificity decreased, and PPV changed trivially for detection of dyslipidemia. Despite increased screening sensitivity by adding the BMI criterion, a clinically significant number of children still may be misclassified.

1 Follower
  • American journal of preventive medicine 08/2009; 37(1 Suppl):S3-8. DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.04.015 · 4.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Treatment of hypercholesterolemia in youth is predicated on the knowledge that we can identify those youth with this atherosclerotic risk factor most likely to develop premature cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Before we can adequately address appropriate lipid-lowering therapies in this special population, we must address and resolve current barriers related to screening and diagnosis. In this article, we describe some of the opportunities and obstacles that clinicians and policy makers confront when applying the current pediatric guidelines focused on screening and treating hypercholesterolemia in the pediatric population.
    Current Atherosclerosis Reports 01/2010; 12(1):20-8. DOI:10.1007/s11883-009-0072-0 · 3.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To review the recent findings on evaluation and management of dyslipidemia in childhood and adolescence, giving a critical view on new therapeutic approaches. In 2008, the American Academy of Pediatrics released an updated policy statement recommending more frequent screening to detect dyslipidemia in childhood and the first-line use of statins in children with dyslipidemia who did not respond to lifestyle intervention and who were more than 8 years of age. These recommendations have caused a lot of controversy within the medical community and media. This debate is also sharpened by the fact that only few trials have investigated the long-term efficacy of statins on prevention of adult cardiovascular disease, their application in dyslipidemias other than familial hypercholesterolemia and the use of new pharmacological tools. The purpose of our paper could not be achieved clearly without a review of the physiology of cholesterol metabolism together with an analysis of causes of primary and secondary dyslipidemia affecting children. Moreover, recent knowledge on lipid-lowering therapy is reviewed.
    Current opinion in pediatrics 08/2010; 22(4):485-93. DOI:10.1097/MOP.0b013e32833ab869 · 2.74 Impact Factor


Available from