Evidence of a modality-dependent role of the cerebellum in working memory? An fMRI study comparing verbal and abstract n-back tasks

Department of Nuclear Medicine (KME), Forschungszentrum Jülich 52426, Jülich, Germany.
NeuroImage (Impact Factor: 6.13). 07/2009; 47(4):2073-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In working memory (WM), functional imaging studies demonstrate cerebellar involvement indicating a cognitive role of the cerebellum. These cognitive contributions were predominantly interpreted as part of the phonological loop within the Baddeley model of WM. However, those underlying investigations were performed in the context of visual verbal WM which could pose a bias when interpreting the results. The aim of this fMRI study was to address the question of whether the cerebellum supports additional aspects of WM in the context of higher cognitive functions. Furthermore, laterality effects were investigated to further disentangle the cerebellar role in the context of the phonological loop and the visuospatial sketchpad. A direct comparison of verbal and abstract visual WM was performed in 17 young volunteers by applying a 2-back paradigm and extracting the % change in BOLD signal from the fMRI data. To minimize potential verbal strategies, Attneave and Arnoult shapes of non-nameable objects were chosen for the abstract condition. The analyses revealed no significant differences in verbal vs. abstract WM. Moreover, no laterality effects were demonstrated in both verbal and abstract WM. These results provide further evidence of a broader cognitive involvement of the cerebellum in WM that is not only confined to the phonological loop but also supports central executive subfunctions. The fact that no lateralization effects are found might be attributed to the characteristics of the n-back paradigm which emphasizes central executive subfunctions over the subsidiary slave systems.

Download full-text


Available from: Hubertus Hautzel, Jun 18, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tinnitus is highly prevalent in the general population. Tinnitus sufferers often report having difficulties focusing on a task at hand and ignoring the tinnitus percept. Behavioral studies have shown evidence for impairments in attention, interference inhibition, and various other executive functions in tinnitus. However, few neuroimaging studies have directly addressed this issue. In the present functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) study we employed a 1-back task, requiring subjects to monitor relevant auditory and visual information. Additionally, interfering stimuli were presented to investigate selection of relevant information and inhibition of irrelevant information. Significant behavioral group differences were not found, although performance worsened for increasing tinnitus severity. Significant group differences in evoked neural activation neither occurred in the central auditory system, nor in the attentional fronto-parietal network. However, the anterior insula and the vermis of the cerebellum showed significantly stronger task-related activation in the tinnitus group when compared to the controls. Furthermore, deactivation in the primary visual cortex that occurred in the control group for various combinations of modalities and distractors was significantly less in the tinnitus group. These results are consistent with previous studies that showed the involvement of various networks in tinnitus, particularly the salience and visual networks, which are also implicated in attention. Although we did not demonstrate cognitive impairment in tinnitus, significantly different evoked responses were found in various brain regions that we attribute to an abnormal involvement of attention control mechanisms in tinnitus. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Hearing research 04/2015; 326. DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2015.03.006 · 2.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We investigated the effects of bisoprolol and losartan on subjects with essential hypertension, by conducting heart rate variability (HRV) analysis of ECG signals. Our intention was to establish the set of linear and nonlinear heart rate variability parameters, which could be used as a noninvasive markers in the treatment of hypertension. Sixty subjects with essential hypertension included in this study were divided in two groups. During the four weeks medical treatment, the first group was administered with daily oral dose of 5 mg of bisoprolol and the second with daily oral dose of 50 mg of losartan. We recorded ECG signals, and performed HRV analysis of consecutive RR time intervals, before and after a month of pharmacological therapy. IN THE CASE OF BISOPROLOL, STATISTICALLY THE MOST SIGNIFICANT CHANGES OF HRV PARAMETERS WERE: TP (1814.1 ± 1731.3 ms(2) vs. 761.3 ± 725.0 ms(2), P < 0.0001), RR (870.2 ± 105.7 ms vs. 1027.2 ± 150.0 ms, P < 0.0001), HR (70.81 ± 8.42 bp/min vs. 60.10 ± 9.52 bp/min, P < 0.0001). In the case of losartan, the most significant changes were: SDNN (43.16 ± 17.27 ms vs. 237.98 ± 118.54 ms, P = 0.002), rmSDD (27.09 ± 18.27 ms vs. 46.82 ± 37.71 ms, P = 0.003), SD2 (55.18 ± 20.6 vs. 70.67 ± 26.12, P < 0.019) and DF2 (0.69 ± 0.21 vs. 0.86 ± 0.25, P < 0.014). Effects of bisoprolol and losartan were especially manifested among the set of linear HRV parameters. As a consequence of effect of losartan, we singled out the nonlinear parameters SD2 and DF2.
    Journal of research in medical sciences 11/2012; 17(11):1027-32. · 0.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The n-back task is a widely used neuroimaging paradigm for studying the neural basis of working memory (WM); however, its neuropsychometric properties have received little empirical investigation. The present study merged clinical neuropsychology and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore the construct validity of the letter variant of the n-back task (LNB) and to further identify the task-evoked networks involved in WM. Construct validity of the LNB task was investigated using a bootstrapping approach to correlate LNB task performance across clinically validated neuropsychological measures of WM to establish convergent validity, as well as measures of related but distinct cognitive constructs (i.e., attention and short-term memory) to establish discriminant validity. Independent component analysis (ICA) identified brain networks active during the LNB task in 34 healthy control participants, and general linear modeling determined task-relatedness of these networks. Bootstrap correlation analyses revealed moderate to high correlations among measures expected to converge with LNB (|ρ|≥0.37) and weak correlations among measures expected to discriminate (|ρ|≤0.29), controlling for age and education. ICA identified 35 independent networks, 17 of which demonstrated engagement significantly related to task condition, controlling for reaction time variability. Of these, the bilateral frontoparietal networks, bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, bilateral superior parietal lobules including precuneus, and frontoinsular network were preferentially recruited by the 2-back condition compared to 0-back control condition, indicating WM involvement. These results support the use of the LNB as a measure of WM and confirm its use in probing the network-level neural correlates of WM processing. (JINS, 2014, 20, 1-15).
    Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 06/2014; 20(07):1-15. DOI:10.1017/S135561771400054X · 3.01 Impact Factor