Antinutritional and/or toxic factors in soybean (Glycine max (L) Merril) seeds: Comparison of different cultivars adapted to the southern region of Brazil

Universidade Federal do Ceará, Ceará, Ceará, Brazil
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (Impact Factor: 1.71). 02/2004; 84(3). DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.1628


Soybean (Glycine max (L) Merril) seeds are known to contain different proteins displaying antinutritional and/or toxic effects, such as soybean agglutinin (an N‐acetylgalactosamine‐specific lectin), proteinase inhibitors (Kunitz‐ and Bowman–Birk‐type trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitors) and urease (seed and tissue isoforms). Two other toxic proteins were previously isolated from soybeans, soyatoxin (21 kDa) and soybean toxin (18.4 kDa), which are immunologically related to canatoxin, a toxic protein from Canavalia ensiformis (jackbean) seeds. In this work we have screened crude extracts from seeds of six different soybean cultivars, which together represent most of the crop harvested in the southern region of Brazil, for the presence of urease, trypsin inhibitory and haemagglutination activities, intraperitoneal toxicity in mice and immunoreactivity against anti‐canatoxin antibodies. Significant differences were found in the contents of proteinase inhibitors, lectin, urease activity and lethality in mice. The relevance of these findings to the agronomic qualities and to the choice of soybean cultivars to be used as food or feed is discussed. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry

Download full-text


Available from: Arlete Beatriz Becker-Ritt,
  • Source
    • "Elle ne peut cependant pas être consommée sans traitement préalable, étant donné sa teneur en facteurs anti nutritionnels (FAN) : saponines, tannins, phytates, lipoxygenases , lectines et antiprotéases . . . Ce large arsenal de composés joue un rôle protecteur des réserves de la gaine, mais intervient probablement aussi sur la germination (Becker-Ritt et al., 2004 ; Cabrera-Orozco et al., 2013). Parmi ces FAN, les inhibiteurs de protéases représentent 6 % des réserves protéiques de la graine (Wang et al., 2004). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: La graine de soja, source exceptionnelle de protéines et d’acides gras polyinsaturés, contient de nombreux facteurs antinutritionnels (FAN) qui rendent impossible sa consommation sans traitement préalable. Parmi ces FAN, les facteurs antitrypsiques (FAT) réduisent fortement la croissance des monogastriques en perturbant l’assimilation des protéines et le fonctionnement pancréatique. Les FAT sont de deux types chez le soja : les inhibiteurs de Kunitz (KTI), et les inhibiteurs de Bowman-Birk (BBI). L’introduction d’un allèle KTI nul réduit l’activité antitrypsique (AAT) mais les BBI restants produisent encore une AAT trop élevée pour que la graine soit consommée crue. Les conditions environnementales peuvent aussi fortement influencer l’AAT. L’objectif de ce travail est d’explorer la variabilité dans une collection variétale et d’analyser l’effet d’une modification des pratiques culturales sur l’AAT en utilisant une méthode enzymatique sur microplaque, plus rapide et moins couteuse. L’erreur relative obtenue est de 7 %. Les variétés de la collection ont des AAT de 23 à 60 Ces AAT ne sont pas corrélées avec la teneur en protéines. Certaines variétés sont probablement porteuses de la mutation KTI nulle, tout en présentant de très fortes teneurs en protéines. L’avancement de la date de semis induit une légère diminution de l’AAT, ce qui montre qu’un tel changement de pratique, tout en préservant la teneur en protéine, serait compatible avec l’amélioration de la qualité de la graine. [Soybean seed is a highly edible source of proteins and polyinsaturated fatty acids. However, it contains many antinutritional components (FAN) that pose restriction to the consumption of raw soybean. Among them, trypsin inhibitors (FAT) strongly reduce the growth of monogastric animals by the reduction of protein digestibility and the induction of pancreatic disorders. Two kinds of FAT are found in soybean seed: Kunitz inhibitors (KTI) and Bowman-Birk inhibitors (BBI). The trypsin inhibition activity (AAT) can be reduced by the use of a KTI null allele in breeding programs but the activity due to the BBI peptides remains too high to allow the use of raw soybean in animal feeding. Environmental growth conditions can also influence the seed AAT. The aim of this work was the evaluation of genotypic variability in a core collection and the study of the effect of a modification of the agronomic practices on the AAT of the seed by the use of a faster and cheaper microanalysis. The relative error was 7%. The AAT of the sampled accessions of the core collection was between 23 and 60 The correlation between AAT and protein content was not significant. Some accessions with a high protein content are probably homozygous for the KTI null allele. Very early sowing induces a slight but significant decrease of the AAT. Thus, such a change in agronomic practices can both preserve the high protein content and the seed nutritional quality.]
    OCL - Oleagineux Corps Gras Lipides 09/2015; 22(5):D504. DOI:10.1051/ocl/2015037
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, profiles of allergen and antinutritional proteins both in wild (Glycine soja) and cultivated (Glycine max) soybean seeds were compared. We used two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) for the separation of proteins at two different pH ranges and applied a combined matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis for the identification of proteins. Although overall distribution patterns of the allergen (Gly m Bd 60K, Gly m Bd 30K, Gly m Bd 28K) and antinutritional proteins (trypsin inhibitors and lectin) appeared similar, there was remarkable variation in the number and intensity of the protein spots between wild and cultivated genotypes. The wild genotype showed fifteen polypeptides of Gly m Bd 60K and three polypeptides of trypsin inhibitors. The cultivated genotypes showed twelve polypeptides of Gly m Bd 60K and two polypeptides of trypsin inhibitors. In contrast, the cultivated genotype showed two polypeptides of Gly m Bd 30K and three polypeptides of lectin and the wild genotype showed two and one polypeptides of Gly m Bd 30K and lectin, respectively. Two polypeptides of Gly m Bd 28K were observed in both genotypes. This is the first study reporting the comparative analysis of allergen and antinutritional proteins in both wild and cultivated soybean genotypes using combined proteomic tools.
    Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 07/2013; 15(2). DOI:10.1007/BF03321912 · 1.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Proximate composition and dietary fibre (as non-starch polysaccharides) of yellow soybeans (from conventional, ecological, transgenic and non-transgenic crops) and green soybeans (from conventional and ecological crops) has been studied. Dietary fibre, fat and ash were significantly higher in yellow than in green samples, but moisture and available carbohydrates were significantly lower in yellow soybean than in green ones. Few statistical differences were found for protein between different samples. Soybean seeds were rich in dietary fibre (yellow: 13.7–16.5 g/100 g, green: 9.19–9.45 g/100 g). This component was evaluated as insoluble and soluble fibre, and subsequently, the neutral sugars and uronic acids were determined by gas liquid chromatography and spectrophotometry, respectively. Insoluble fibre became the predominant fibre fraction in yellow and green soybeans (74–78%), and was mainly composed of glucose, uronic acids, galactose, arabinose and xylose. Soluble fibre was between 22% and 26% in both kinds of samples and the principal monomers were uronic acids, galactose and arabinose. The major difference between total dietary fibres of yellow and green commercial samples was the proportion of galactose, which was an important constituent in yellow soybeans (21%) and a minor one in green soybeans (5%).
    Food Chemistry 01/2007; 101(3-101):1216-1222. DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.03.025 · 3.39 Impact Factor
Show more