Article

Laser Smoothing and Imprint Reduction with a Foam Layer in the Multikilojoule Regime

CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France.
Physical Review Letters (Impact Factor: 7.51). 06/2009; 102(19):195005. DOI: 10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.102.195005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This Letter presents first experimental results of the laser imprint reduction in fusion scale plasmas using a low-density foam layer. The experiments were conducted on the LIL facility at the energy level of 12 kJ with millimeter-size plasmas, reproducing the conditions of the initial interaction phase in the direct-drive scheme. The results include the generation of a supersonic ionization wave in the foam and the reduction of the initial laser fluctuations after propagation through 500 mum of foam with limited levels of stimulated Brillouin and Raman scattering. The smoothing mechanisms are analyzed and explained.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: C. Riconda, Aug 06, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
166 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Processing of X-ray and optical streak-camera images after brightness amplification 5 proves unambiguously the existence of a preheating of the foil in two-layer targets (polymer aerogel plus Al foil). We observed this effect earlier at the accuracy limit of the experiment. Preheating may be explained by the initial transmission of laser radiation by an inhomogeneous plasma and aerogel remnants. The fraction of laser energy that passed through a microheterogeneous plasma to the foil or shell is small in comparison with the total energy in the pulse, but it comes to the target (foil or shell) at the initial period of the laser pulse and can be significantly affected by the dynamics of plasma and the efficiency of spherical cryogenic thermonuclear targets. Keywordslaser plasma-critical density-low-density targets-polymer aerogel-nanoparticles-microheterogeneity-turbulent plasma-laser-radiation scattering on plasma density fluctuations.
    Journal of Russian Laser Research 05/2010; 31(3):256-269. DOI:10.1007/s10946-010-9145-3 · 0.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An experiment carried out on the LIL facility is presented. The experiment was designed to investigate the propagation of a multi-kJ laser beam through a plasma produced by the irradiation of a low-density plastic foam. Laser beam self-smoothing has been observed and its consequences on laser imprint and Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS) are discussed.
    Journal of Physics Conference Series 08/2010; DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/244/2/022021
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: On the Laser Integration Line (LIL) facility at Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (CEA) near Bordeaux (France), streak cameras (SCs) are extensively used as x-ray detectors by plasma physicists for the recording of transient phenomena as short as 100 ps. For proper interpretation of the experimental results measurements of the SC yield are carried out before each experimental campaign. The yield is actually an indirect measurement that depends on several other measured quantities. The uncertainty associated with the yield is evaluated using the analytical GUM approach and the Monte Carlo (MC) approach using GUM Supplement 1. It is shown in particular that in the assessment process the standard uncertainty and the probability density function of some input quantities propagate through polynomial fitting functions and integrals. A sensitivity analysis is also performed to identify the critical input quantities. The study shows that after correction of the manufacturer's fact sheet the GUM evaluation converges to MC evaluation when the uncertainties associated with non-linear input quantities become small. When propagating uncertainties through integrals it is observed that the uncertainty of the output quantity is mainly dominated by strong correlation effects with the covariance components adding up to produce large uncertainties. Finally, by comparing the experimental yield with a theoretical model good agreement is found.
    Metrologia 12/2010; 48(1):16. DOI:10.1088/0026-1394/48/1/002 · 1.65 Impact Factor
Show more