Waiting for the Opportune Moment: The Tobacco Industry and Marijuana Legalization

Milbank Quarterly (Impact Factor: 3.38). 06/2014; 92(2):207-42. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12055
Source: PubMed


In 2012, Washington State and Colorado legalized the recreational use of marijuana, and Uruguay, beginning in 2014, will become the first country to legalize the sale and distribution of marijuana. The challenge facing policymakers and public health advocates is reducing the harms of an ineffective, costly, and discriminatory "war on drugs" while preventing another public health catastrophe similar to tobacco use, which kills 6 million people worldwide each year.

Between May and December 2013, using the standard snowball research technique, we searched the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library of previously secret tobacco industry documents (http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu).

Since at least the 1970s, tobacco companies have been interested in marijuana and marijuana legalization as both a potential and a rival product. As public opinion shifted and governments began relaxing laws pertaining to marijuana criminalization, the tobacco companies modified their corporate planning strategies to prepare for future consumer demand.

Policymakers and public health advocates must be aware that the tobacco industry or comparable multinational organizations (eg, food and beverage industries) are prepared to enter the marijuana market with the intention of increasing its already widespread use. In order to prevent domination of the market by companies seeking to maximize market size and profits, policymakers should learn from their successes and failures in regulating tobacco.

Download full-text


Available from: Heikki Hiilamo, Jun 19, 2014
  • Source
    • "While driving under the influence of marijuana is prohibited in all US states (Walsh 2009), there has been a significant rise in marijuana decriminalization and medical marijuana legalization over the past decade (NORML) 2014c; Svrakic et al. 2012; Wolff and Johnston 2014). Recreational marijuana use is also currently legal in Colorado and Washington (Asbridge 2014; Barry et al. 2014; Kilmer 2014). The recent increase in marijuana accessibility (Sewell et al. 2009; Whitehill et al. 2014) underscores the need for effective legislation to combat potential health and safety risks posed by driving under the influence of marijuana (Grotenhermen et al. 2007; Whitehill et al. 2014). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Marijuana has become the most commonly detected non-alcohol substance among drivers in the United States and Europe. Use of marijuana has been shown to impair driving performance and increase crash risk. Due to the lack of standardization in assessing marijuana-induced impairment and limitations of zero tolerance legislation, more jurisdictions are adopting per se laws by specifying a legal limit of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) at or above which drivers are prosecuted for driving under the influence of marijuana. This review examines major considerations when developing these threshold THC concentrations and specifics of legal THC limits for drivers adopted by different jurisdictions in the United States and other countries.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The politics of so-called “morality policies” including same-sex marriage, abortion, gambling, and drug control have captured the attention of the public and social scientists in recent years. Drawing on data from journalistic accounts, legislative transcripts, elite interviews, and document analysis, this study examines the extensiveness of morality talk in debates over marijuana decriminalization in the United States. The results indicate that critics deployed moral (decriminalization sends the wrong message to youth, decreases risk perception, and promotes “normalization”), mixed (decriminalization has negative effects for families, communities, and society), and non-moral (decriminalization negatively impacts individuals vis-à-vis physical, mental, and social health) arguments. The results both improve our understanding of the factors that will shape United States marijuana policy in the future and offer theoretical implications for our understanding of morality policy as a substantive category of public policy.
    World Medical and Health Policy 12/2014; 6(4). DOI:10.1002/wmh3.114
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A major challenge in assessing the public health impact of legalising cannabis use in Colorado and Washington State is the absence of any experience with legal cannabis markets. The Netherlands created a de facto legalised cannabis market for recreational use, but policy analysts disagree about how it has affected rates of cannabis use. Some US states have created de facto legal supply of cannabis for medical use. So far this policy does not appear to have increased cannabis use or cannabis-related harm. Given experience with more liberal alcohol policies, the legalisation of recreational cannabis use is likely to increase use among current users. It is also likely that legalisation will increase the number of new users among young adults but it remains uncertain how many may be recruited, within what time frame, among which groups within the population, and how many of these new users will become regular users. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. © 2015 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
    Clinical Pharmacology &#38 Therapeutics 03/2015; 97(6). DOI:10.1002/cpt.110 · 7.90 Impact Factor
Show more