Article

[Adverse effect of local anaesthetics].

Afdeling Mondziekten en Kaakchirurgie van het Vrije Universiteit medisch centrum (VUmc)/Academisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam (ACTA).
Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde 06/2009; 116(5):235-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Local anaesthetics are frequently administered preceding oral treatment. Since little is known about the incidence of adverse effects after administration of local anaesthetics, a prospective study involving a group of 219 patients was performed. The most frequently observed complications were insufficient anaesthesia (17%) and positive blood aspiration (3%). Pain during administration, paralysis, blanching, haematoma, and vasovagal collapse occurred each in less than 1% of the patients. The results suggested that administration of local anaesthetics involves a limited risk of adverse events and that the adverse events are usually minor and transient.

3 Bookmarks
 · 
111 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The safety record of local anaesthetic agents is high but complications do occur. These may be systemic reactions to the local anaesthetic itself or to the vasoconstrictor. The former may be allergic or toxic in nature. Psychomotor reactions, often attributed erroneously to the vasoconstrictor, are more common. Regional complications, usually due to faulty technique, may be immediate or delayed. Among the former are pain, haematoma formation, tissue blanching, facial paralysis, amaurosis, diplopia and needle breakage. The delayed regional complications include pain, prolonged anaesthesia or paraesthesia, trismus, infection, sloughing and ulceration. The management of these complications is described.
    International Dental Journal 01/1985; 34(4):232-7. · 1.04 Impact Factor
  • Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 07/2003; 61(7):800. · 1.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to produce some observational evidence of the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve block (IDB) analgesia that is achieved in general dental practice. The objective was to help provide some measure of expected failure rates and help dental practitioners in their self-appraisal of this crucial basic skill. Up to 100 consecutive IDB analgesia procedures for four dentists were recorded. In a subdivision of this study 200 consecutive IDBs for a fifth dentist were recorded. This dentist had the greatest experience of giving IDB analgesia of the dentists in this study. In this part of the study the dentist made a note if he anticipated that the procedure would fail. The reason for this was that it was felt that experienced dental practitioners could predict when failure was about to occur. The level of facial nerve palsy was also recorded. Overall, 533 of 580 (91.9%) local anaesthetic administrations were deemed to be successful. The only factor that significantly affected the likelihood of success was the practitioner administering the local anaesthetic, and this was only borderline statistically significant. In order to be certain that the other factors did not affect the outcome, the data were re-analysed using the technique of Poisson regression. This technique investigated the effects of each of the factors in turn while controlling for the differences in success that can be attributed to the different practitioners. The regression analyses also did not detect any differences in success that could be attributed to any of the other recorded factors. The incidence of facial palsy was 0.3%. This paper gives an insight into the possible success rates to be encountered by general dental practitioners when they administer IDB analgesia. The only recorded factor that could be shown to affect the chance of a successful local analgesic was the operator. The incidence of facial nerve palsy at 0.3% may be more common than has previously been considered.
    Primary Dental Journal 11/2001; 8(4):139-42.

Full-text

Download
334 Downloads
Available from
May 15, 2014