Article

Gradient lithography of engineered proteins to fabricate 2D and 3D cell culture microenvironments.

NSF Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center-NSEC, University of California, 3112 Etcheverry Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1740, USA.
Biomedical Microdevices (Impact Factor: 2.77). 07/2009; 11(5):1127-34. DOI: 10.1007/s10544-009-9329-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Spatial patterning of proteins is a valuable technique for many biological applications and is the prevailing tool for defining microenvironments for cells in culture, a required procedure in developmental biology and tissue engineering research. However, it is still challenging to achieve protein patterns that closely mimic native microenvironments, such as gradient protein distributions with desirable mechanical properties. By combining projection dynamic mask lithography and protein engineering with non-canonical photosensitive amino acids, we demonstrate a simple, scalable strategy to fabricate any user-defined 2D or 3D stable gradient pattern with complex geometries from an artificial extracellular matrix (aECM) protein. We show that the elastic modulus and chemical nature of the gradient profile are biocompatible and allow useful applications in cell biological research.

0 Followers
 · 
95 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A consecutive fabrication approach of independently tailored gradients of the topographical parameters distance, diameter and height in arrays of well-ordered nanopillars on smooth SiO2-Si-wafers is presented. For this purpose, previously reported preparation techniques are further developed and combined. First, self-assembly of Au-salt loaded micelles by dip-coating with computer-controlled pulling-out velocities and subsequent hydrogen plasma treatment produce quasi-hexagonally ordered, 2-dimensional arrays of Au nanoparticles (NPs) with unidirectional variations of the interparticle distances along the pulling direction between 50-120 nm. Second, the distance (or areal density) gradient profile received in this way is superimposed with a diameter-controlled gradient profile of the NPs applying a selective photochemical growth technique. For demonstration, a 1D shutter is used for locally defined UV exposure times to prepare Au NP size gradients varying between 12 and 30 nm. Third, these double-gradient NP arrangements serve as etching masks in a following reactive ion etching step delivering arrays of nanopillars. For height gradient generation, the etching time is locally controlled by applying a shutter made from Si wafer piece. Due to the high flexibility of the etching process, the preparation route works on various materials such as cover slips, silicon, silicon oxide, silicon nitride and silicon carbide.
    Nanotechnology 03/2015; 26(11):115301. DOI:10.1088/0957-4484/26/11/115301 · 3.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Here, we describe a universal photolithography setup for the patterning of biorepulsive self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) as well as other monomolecular films. The setup is based on commercial equipment consisting of a computer-controlled digital micromirror device chip combined with a suitable optics and a powerful light-emitting diode (LED) source delivering ultraviolet (UV) light with a wavelength of 375 nm. Digital patterns generated in the computer serve as an input for the chip, which modulates the reflected light accordingly, transferring the pattern to the sample surface. The performance of the setup was demonstrated by UV-induced modification of the nonsubstituted alkanethiolate (NS-AT) SAMs and biorepulsive oligo(ethylene glycol)-substituted AT (OEG-AT) monolayers on Au(111), upon homogeneous illumination of the test samples. Further, both nonspecific and specific templates for the protein adsorption were fabricated in the protein-repelling OEG-AT matrix by either direct writing or using an additional irradiation-promoted exchange reaction with a biotin-terminated AT. These templates were used either for nonspecific adsorption of bovine serum albumin (BSA) or for the specific adsorption of avidin, the latter relying on the interaction with the embedded biotin receptors. The density of the adsorbed protein layers across the patterns could be precisely varied by selection of proper irradiation doses.
    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 12/2014; 119(1). DOI:10.1021/jp510809a · 4.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The reconstruction of soft tissue, such as that which is found in the nervous system, is governed by the mechanical cues of the growth microenvironment. The complexity of the nervous system, particularly in cases of nerve repair and reconstruction, necessitates the development of facile high-throughput investigational tools. This study assesses the hypothesis that a mechanically tunable photoreactive interpenetrating network (IPN) of hyaluronic acid and puramatrix can be manipulated in order to demonstrate that 3-D environmental stiffness influences neurite growth and proliferation. For these studies we employed photocrosslinkable glycidyl methacrylate hyaluronic acid (GMHA) and puramatrix, a self-assembling peptide scaffold, leading to a structurally adjustable IPN system. Our in vitro model provides us with a simple, reproducible environment to generate different properties in a single specimen. Mechanically manipulated IPN systems with different degrees of methacrylation were fabricated using a dynamic mask projection photolithography apparatus and characterized. To gauge the impact of IPN stiffness on neurite outgrowth, dorsal root ganglia (DRG) explants were cultured in the hydrogels. We found that neurite outgrowth in 3-D was more likely to happen in an environment with a lesser degree of methacrylation, which corresponded to structures that were more compliant and more porous. Overall, tuning the mechanical behavior of our IPN systems led to statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences in cellular growth and extension that warrants further investigations.
    Acta Biomaterialia 01/2015; 16. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.014 · 5.68 Impact Factor