Factors associated with a physician's recommendation for colorectal cancer screening in a diverse population.

Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-1123, USA.
Family medicine (Impact Factor: 0.85). 07/2009; 41(6):427-33.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is widely recommended but underused. A physician's recommendation for CRC screening has been consistently associated with patients undergoing CRC screening, but a better understanding of factors influencing a physician's recommendation for CRC screening is needed. This study's purpose was to describe patient and physician factors associated with a physician's recommendation for CRC screening.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted in a primary care clinic population during 2004-2005 to determine the association between self-reported physician recommendation for CRC testing and patients' sociodemographic factors, health characteristics, other health behaviors, and physician and patient-physician factors including patient-physician gender and racial/ethnic congruence. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed.
A total of 560 patients ages 50-80 were recruited. Their mean age was 63 years, 47.5% were male, 36% were non-Hispanic whites, 35% were African Americans, and 29% were Hispanics. Sixty-one percent reported receiving a physician's recommendation for CRC testing. In multivariate testing, a physician's recommendation for CRC testing was associated with having a female physician, being a male patient, having gastrointestinal disease, and having better health status.
Female physicians are more likely to recommend CRC. Patients are more likely to receive a CRC recommendation if they are male, have gastrointestinal disease, and have better health status. Further studies should explore cultural influences on physician recommendation for screening.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: The purpose of our study was to examine the discussion prior to open access colonoscopy (OAC) to assess for areas of improvement. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was administered to consecutive patients undergoing OAC. Results: 426 subjects completed the questionnaire. Male subjects reported a mean 9.7 +4.3 minutes of discussion about CRCS, colonoscopy procedure and preparation compared to female subjects at 7.6 +4.3 min. 52% of participants felt that they were adequately informed prior to OAC. Women were less likely to have discussed other forms of CRCS (OR 0.36, p<0.001), risks of colonoscopy (OR 0.45, p=0.005) medications to avoid (OR 0.51, p=0.012) and were half as likely to feel adequately informed by their practitioner (OR 0.40, p<0.001). Of all PCPs, women felt that GYNs best informed them about their procedure (OR 12.5, p=0.005). Subjects with a relationship for 10 years or greater with their doctor were 43% more likely to be adequately informed (OR 1.43, p=0.00). Conclusion: Despite the time devoted by PCPs patients, particularly women, are least likely to feel informed about the CRCS process. With the increasing efforts to improve CRCS compliance, strategies must be developed to prompt PCPs to discuss the CRCS process with their patients.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Middle-aged and older adults often experience several simultaneously occurring chronic conditions or "multiple morbidity" (MM). The task of both managing MM and preventing chronic conditions can be overwhelming, particularly in populations with high disease burdens, low socioeconomic status, and health care provider shortages. This article sought to understand Appalachian residents' perspectives on MM management and prevention. Forty-one rural Appalachian residents aged 50 and above with MM were interviewed about disease management and colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. Transcripts were examined for overall analytic categories and coded using techniques to enhance transferability and rigor. Participants indicate facing various challenges to prevention due, in part, to conditions within their rural environment. Patients and providers spend significant time and energy on MM management, often precluding prevention activities. This article discusses implications of MM management for CRC prevention and strategies to increase disease prevention among this rural, vulnerable population burdened by MM.
    Journal of Applied Gerontology 12/2011; 30(6):671-699. DOI:10.1177/0733464811378106 · 0.97 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine whether a communication instrument provided to patients prior to their primary care physician (PCP) visit initiates a conversation with their PCP about colorectal cancer screening (CRC-S), impacting screening referral rates in fully insured and underinsured patients.


Available from