Developing the Science of Health Care Emergency Preparedness and Response

Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (Impact Factor: 0.7). 07/2009; 3(2 Suppl):S2-3. DOI: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181a3e290
Source: PubMed
1 Read
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since 2001, the United States government has spent substantial resources on preparing the nation against a bioterrorist attack. Earlier articles in this series analyzed civilian biodefense funding by the federal government from fiscal years 2001 through 2008. This article updates those figures with budgeted amounts for fiscal year 2009, specifically analyzing the budgets and allocations for biodefense at the Departments of Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Defense, Agriculture, and State and the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Science Foundation.
    Biosecurity and Bioterrorism 07/2008; 6(2):131-46. DOI:10.1089/bsp.2008.0025 · 1.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of hospitals in the community response to disasters has received increased attention, particularly since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Hospitals must be prepared to respond to and recover from all-hazards emergencies and disasters. There have been several initiatives to guide hospitals' role in these events and to assist hospitals in their effort to prepare for them. This article focuses on the efforts of 4 distinct groups: The Joint Commission (TJC), the executive branch of the US government, the US Congress, and the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Despite the different approach each group uses to assist hospitals to improve their emergency management capabilities, the initiatives reinforce one another and have resulted in increased efforts by hospitals to improve their disaster preparedness and response capabilities and community integration. The continued progress of our medical response system in all-hazard emergencies and disasters depends in large part on the future guidance and support of these 4 key institutions.
    Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 07/2009; 3(2 Suppl):S68-73. DOI:10.1097/DMP.0b013e31819ef060 · 0.70 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is no widely accepted, validated framework of health care emergency management capabilities (HEMCs) that can be used by facilities to guide their disaster preparedness and response efforts. We reviewed the HEMCs and the evaluation methods used by the Veterans Health Administration, The Joint Commission, the Institute of Medicine Metropolitan Medical Response System committee, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Health and Human Services to determine whether a core set of HEMCs and evaluative methods could be identified.Despite differences in the conceptualization of health care emergency management, there is considerable overlap among the agencies regarding major capabilities and capability-specific elements. Of the 5 agencies, 4 identified occupant safety and continuity of operations as major capabilities. An additional 5 capabilities were identified as major by 3 agencies. Most often the differences were related to whether a capability should be a major one versus a capability-specific element (eg, decontamination, management of resources). All of the agencies rely on multiple indicators and data sources to evaluate HEMCs. Few performance-based tools have been developed and none have been fully tested for their reliability and validity. Consensus on a framework and tools to measure HEMCs is needed.
    Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 07/2009; 3(2 Suppl):S45-51. DOI:10.1097/DMP.0b013e31819f4186 · 0.70 Impact Factor