Implementing evidence-based practices for people with schizophrenia

Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA.
Schizophrenia Bulletin (Impact Factor: 8.61). 08/2009; 35(4):704-13. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbp041
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Over the last decade, a consensus has emerged regarding a set of evidence-based practices for schizophrenia that address symptom management and psychosocial functioning. Yet, surveys suggest that the great majority of the population of individuals with schizophrenia do not receive evidence-based care. In this article, we review the empirical literature on implementation of evidence-based practices for schizophrenia patients. We first examine lessons learned from implementation studies in general medicine. We then summarize the implementation literature specific to schizophrenia, including medication practices, psychosocial interventions, information technology, and state- and federal-level interventions. We conclude with recommendations for future directions.

1 Follower
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fidelity scales have been widely used to assess program adherence to the principles of an evidence-based practice, but they do not measure important aspects of quality of care. Pragmatic scales measuring clinical quality of services are needed to complement fidelity scales measuring structural aspects of program implementation. As part of the instrumentation developed for the National Implementing Evidence-Based Practices Project, we piloted a new instrument with two 5-item quality scales, Individualization (a client-level quality scale) and Quality Improvement (an organizational-level quality scale). Pairs of independent fidelity assessors conducted fidelity reviews in 49 sites in 8 states at baseline and at four subsequent 6-month intervals over a 2-year follow-up period. The assessors followed a standardized protocol to administer these quality scales during daylong site visits; during these same visits they assessed programs on fidelity to the evidence-based practice that the site was seeking to implement. Assessors achieved acceptable interrater reliability for both Individualization and Quality Improvement. Principal components factor analysis confirmed the 2-scale structure. The two scales were modestly correlated with each other and with the evidence-based practice fidelity scales. Over the first year, Individualization and Quality Improvement improved, but showed little or no improvement during the last year of follow-up. The two newly developed scales showed adequate psychometric properties in this preliminary study, but further research is needed to assess their validity and utility in routine clinical practice.
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 07/2009; 36(5):349-57. DOI:10.1007/s10488-009-0226-y · 3.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Schizophrenia Bulletin 08/2009; 35(4):659-60. DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbp051 · 8.61 Impact Factor
Show more