In vivo visualization of transplanted an creatic islets by MRI: Comparison between in vivo, histological and electron microscopy findings
Department of Morphological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie 8, Verona, Italy. Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging
(Impact Factor: 2.92).
05/2009; 4(3):135-42. DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.274
The aim of the work was to compare in vivo MRI visualization of pancreatic islets labeled with clinical-grade superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIOs) contrast agents with ex vivo examination of liver tissue in an experimental model of marginal mass transplantation in rats. Seven hundred IEq (Islet Equivalent) from Wistar rats, labeled by incubation with Endorem or Resovist, were transplanted into Sprague-Dawley rats through the portal vein. Liver MR images of recipient rats were acquired at different time points (3-42 days) after transplantation. Animals were sacrificed during this period and their livers were excised and prepared for histology and electron microscopy. Hypointense spots originating from iron particles were observed in MR images. The number of separate spots was counted. Three days after transplantation one spot for every three or four transplanted islets was observed. Seven days after transplantation, histological sections showed the presence of iron within pancreatic islets. The time course of MR images showed a decrease in the number of spots, at 42 days, amounting to 65 and 22% of the initial value, for Resovist and Endorem respectively, while no immunopositive endocrine cells were detected in histological slices. The present work shows that pancreatic islets can be labeled using clinically approved SPIO contrast agents and visualized using in vivo MRI with high sensitivity, consistently with findings in the literature. Differently from reports in the literature, our findings indicate that iron particles could last in the liver for long periods, independently of the presence of intact pancreatic islets.
Available from: Chia-Rui Shen
- "In the past years, a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique has been used to detect transplanted islets labeled with dextran-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO), such as ferumoxide (Feridex®, Endorem™) and Ferucarbotran (Resovist®) in mice –, rats –, baboons , and humans , . Unfortunately, the manufacturing of Feridex® and Resovist® was ceased in 2008 and 2009, respectively . "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To better understand the fate of islet isografts and allografts, we utilized a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique to monitor mouse islets labeled with a novel MR contrast agent, chitosan-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide (CSPIO) nanoparticles.
After being incubated with and without CSPIO (10 µg/ml), C57BL/6 mouse islets were examined under transmission electron microscope (TEM) and their insulin secretion was measured. Cytotoxicity was examined in α (αTC1) and β (NIT-1 and βTC) cell lines as well as islets. C57BL/6 mice were used as donors and inbred C57BL/6 and Balb/c mice were used as recipients of islet transplantation. Three hundred islets were transplanted under the left kidney capsule of each mouse and then MR was performed in the recipients periodically. At the end of study, the islet graft was removed for histology and TEM studies.
After incubation of mouse islets with CSPIO (10 µg/mL), TEM showed CSPIO in endocytotic vesicles of α- and β-cells at 8 h. Incubation with CSPIO did not affect insulin secretion from islets and death rates of αTC1, NIT-1 and βTC cell lines as well as islets. After syngeneic and allogeneic transplantation, grafts of CSPIO-labeled islets were visualized on MR scans as persistent hypointense areas. At 8 weeks after syngeneic transplantation and 31 days after allogeneic transplantation, histology of CSPIO-labeled islet grafts showed colocalized insulin and iron staining in the same areas but the size of allografts decreased with time. TEM with elementary iron mapping demonstrated CSPIO distributed in the cytoplasm of islet cells, which maintained intact ultrastructure.
Our results indicate that after syngeneic and allogeneic transplantation, islets labeled with CSPIO nanoparticles can be effectively and safely imaged by MR.
PLoS ONE 04/2013; 8(4):e62626. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0062626 · 3.23 Impact Factor
Available from: Lara Leoni
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The increasing global incidence of diabetes and advancements in clinical pancreatic islet transplantation for the treatment of Type I diabetes have renewed the interest in understanding the variations of beta cell mass and function relative not only to transplant outcome but also to the onset and progression of diabetes. A deeper comprehension of the molecular and cellular processes involved in pancreatic islet inflammation and cytotoxicity is necessary to further improve efficacy of islet transplantation and to develop new therapies aimed at preserving beta cell function in pathological conditions. Available diagnostic methods based on metabolic response are unsuitable as they lack correlation to islet mass, viability and function. Great emphasis has been placed on developing noninvasive imaging technologies which enable the tracking of both endogenous and transplanted islet mass and potentially function overtime, the characterization of changes in islet vasculature and the degree of T-cell infiltration during insulitis. Among the more relevant modalities are magnetic resonance, positron emitted tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, bioluminescence and fluorescence optical imaging. This review focuses on the most recent advancements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of pancreatic islets. In-vitro approaches aimed at characterizing the potency of isolated islets as well as in-vivo advancements in the assessment of transplanted beta cell mass are presented together with the significant progress made in the in-vivo imaging of the endocrine pancreas and islet vasculature and inflammation. Different experimental approaches are compared via their advantages and limitations with respect to their clinical implementation.
Current pharmaceutical design 05/2010; 16(14):1582-94. DOI:10.2174/138161210791164171 · 3.45 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Islet transplantation is a promising treatment option for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D); however, the fate of the graft over time remains difficult to follow, due to the lack of available tools capable of monitoring graft rejection and inflammation prior to islet graft loss. Due to the challenges imposed by the location of the pancreas and the sparsely dispersed beta-cell population within the pancreas, currently, the clinical verification of beta-cell abnormalities can only be obtained indirectly via metabolic studies, which typically is not possible until after a significant deterioration in islet function has already occurred. The development of non-invasive imaging methods for the assessment of the pancreatic beta-cells, however, offers the potential for the early detection of beta-cell dysfunction prior to the clinical onset of T1D and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Ideal islet imaging agents would have an acceptable residence time in the human body, be capable of providing high-resolution images with minimal uptake in surrounding tissues (e.g., the liver), would not be toxic to islets, and would not require pre-treatment of islets prior to transplantation. A variety of currently available imaging techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bioluminescence imaging (BLI), and nuclear imaging have been tested for the study of beta-cell diseases. In this article, we summarize the recent advances made in nuclear imaging techniques for non-invasive imaging of pancreatic beta-cells. The use of radioactive probes for islet imaging is also discussed.
Advanced drug delivery reviews 08/2010; 62(11):1125-38. DOI:10.1016/j.addr.2010.09.006 · 15.04 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.