Brief report: a comparison of indirect versus experimental strategies for the assessment of pica.

University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA, USA.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (Impact Factor: 3.06). 07/2009; 39(11):1582-6. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-009-0766-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We conducted functional analyses of pica for three individuals with varying levels of intellectual disabilities. In addition, two indirect assessment instruments (the Motivational Assessment Scale [MAS], and the Questions About Behavioral Function [QABF]) were also administered to both the parent and teacher of the child participants. Results of the functional analyses indicated that pica was sensitive to automatic reinforcement. Further, results of both the MAS and QABF also suggested behavioral sensitivity to automatic reinforcement.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A method is presented by which realistic worst-case parameter sets can be calculated. The method uses a statistical model from which all main MOS parameter values are calculated from four independent parameters. The statistical model, which is derived from a large number of measurements, is used to account for the correlations between the model parameters. The calculated worst-case parameter sets have been verified against measurements and have been shown to be accurate in predicting the worst-case current levels for both n-channel and p-channel devices.
    Microelectronic Test Structures, 1989. ICMTS 1989. Proceedings of the 1989 International Conference on; 04/1989
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Self-injurious behavior (SIB) is a serious problem for some people with pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) which is a common focus of clinical treatment and has received extensive attention in the research literature. This is the first of two related chapters. The first provides an overview of SIB and behavioral approaches to its treatment. The second reviews pharmacological approaches to treatment of SIB and then work which attempts to integrate behavioral and pharmacological treatments. Although other approaches to treatment of SIB, such as psychotherapy, counseling, and sensory approaches, may be used in practice, there is little research evidence to review on their efficacy in people with ASDs. Additionally, single-case experiments suggest that reported effects of interventions such as sensory integration with particular individuals may be more parsimoniously explained by the social interaction or reduction in task demands associated with the therapy and that function-based behavioral interventions are equally or more effective in reducing SIB (Devlin, Leader, & Healey, 2009; Mason & Iwata, 1990). Hence, these two chapters focus on behavioral and pharmacological interventions.
    12/2010: pages 437-452;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study sought to compare the results of the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS; Durand & Crimmins, 1988), Questions About Behavior Function Scale (QABF; Matson & Vollmer, 1996) and Functional Analysis Screening Tool (FAST; Iwata & Deleon, 1996), when completed by parent informants in a sample of children and youth with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) who display challenging behaviour. Results indicated that there was low agreement between the functional hypotheses derived from each of three measures. In addition, correlations between functionally analogous scales were substantially lower than expected, while correlations between non-analogous subscales were stronger than anticipated. As indicated by this study, clinicians choosing to use FBA questionnaires to assess behavioural function, may not obtain accurate functional hypotheses, potentially resulting in ineffective intervention plans. The current study underscores the caution that must be taken when asking parents to complete these questionnaires to determine the function(s) of challenging behaviour for children/youth with ASD.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 19, 2014