Brief Report: A Comparison of Indirect Versus Experimental Strategies for the Assessment of Pica

University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA, USA.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (Impact Factor: 3.06). 07/2009; 39(11):1582-6. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-009-0766-8
Source: PubMed


We conducted functional analyses of pica for three individuals with varying levels of intellectual disabilities. In addition, two indirect assessment instruments (the Motivational Assessment Scale [MAS], and the Questions About Behavioral Function [QABF]) were also administered to both the parent and teacher of the child participants. Results of the functional analyses indicated that pica was sensitive to automatic reinforcement. Further, results of both the MAS and QABF also suggested behavioral sensitivity to automatic reinforcement.

Download full-text


Available from: John C. Borrero, Apr 06, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A method is presented by which realistic worst-case parameter sets can be calculated. The method uses a statistical model from which all main MOS parameter values are calculated from four independent parameters. The statistical model, which is derived from a large number of measurements, is used to account for the correlations between the model parameters. The calculated worst-case parameter sets have been verified against measurements and have been shown to be accurate in predicting the worst-case current levels for both n-channel and p-channel devices.
    Microelectronic Test Structures, 1989. ICMTS 1989. Proceedings of the 1989 International Conference on; 04/1989
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study sought to compare the results of the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS; Durand & Crimmins, 1988), Questions About Behavior Function Scale (QABF; Matson & Vollmer, 1996) and Functional Analysis Screening Tool (FAST; Iwata & Deleon, 1996), when completed by parent informants in a sample of children and youth with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) who display challenging behaviour. Results indicated that there was low agreement between the functional hypotheses derived from each of three measures. In addition, correlations between functionally analogous scales were substantially lower than expected, while correlations between non-analogous subscales were stronger than anticipated. As indicated by this study, clinicians choosing to use FBA questionnaires to assess behavioural function, may not obtain accurate functional hypotheses, potentially resulting in ineffective intervention plans. The current study underscores the caution that must be taken when asking parents to complete these questionnaires to determine the function(s) of challenging behaviour for children/youth with ASD.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Motivation Assessment Scale is an aid for hypothesis-driven functional analysis. This study presents its Spanish cross-cultural validation while examining psychometric attributes not yet explored. The study sample comprised 80 primary caregivers of children with autism. Acceptability, scaling assumptions, internal consistency, factor structure, inter-assessor reliability and agreement, and known-group validity analyses were performed. Scaling assumptions, internal consistency (Cronbach alpha of 0.75) and factor structure were satisfactory other than for the Escape domain which demonstrated low internal consistency (0.65), inadequate scaling assumptions (multitrait analysis, 50% success rate) and did not constitute a separate factor. Caregivers' agreement for the primary function reached 73.9% and known group-validity hypotheses across behavior topographies were partially met. The clinical appropriateness of the scale is discussed.
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 05/2010; 41(1):82-91. DOI:10.1007/s10803-010-1022-y · 3.06 Impact Factor
Show more