Disease-free survival and prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in T1-T2 N positive breast cancer patients. A population registry-based study in a European country.

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Castellon General Hospital, Avda Benicassim s/n. 12004, Castellon, Spain.
World Journal of Surgery (Impact Factor: 2.23). 07/2009; 33(8):1659-64. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0078-3
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The ratio of positive lymph nodes between the total number of harvested lymph nodes (metastatic lymph node ratio, MLNR) has been proposed as an alternative to the total number of lymph nodes alone in predicting outcomes for patients with breast cancer. Because there can be differences between European and non-European populations, the authors present the first study analyzing MLNR influence over disease-free survival (DFS) by using a population-based cancer registry in a European country.
Data from 441 patients with T1-2 N1-3 breast cancer included in the Castellon Cancer Registry (Comunidad Valenciana, Spain) were used. Cumulative DFS was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method, with univariate comparisons between groups through the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis.
At univariate analysis, factors influencing the 10-year DFS rate were tumor size, conservative or nonconservative surgery, histologic grade, histologic type, radiotherapy, tamoxifen, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, p53 status, total number of positive lymph nodes, and MLNR. At multivariate analysis, tumor size, MLNR, and progesterone receptor status were revealed to be independent prognostic factors; the metastatic lymph node ratio was the most notably independent factor (hazard ratio 1.02, 5.21, and 0.61, respectively).
MLNR is a stronger prognostic factor for recurrence than the total number of positive lymph nodes in T1-T2 N1-3 breast cancer.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine how lymph node ratio (LNR; the ratio of the number of metastatic lymph nodes to the number of removed lymph nodes) can supplement the TNM nodal classification in breast carcinoma. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the file records of 2,151 patients. RESULTS: Lymph node ratio-based low- (LNR ≤ 0.20), intermediate- (LNR 0.21-0.65), and high-risk (LNR > 0.65) patient groups had significantly different disease-free survival (DFS) (P < 0.001). The DFS of patients with N1, N2, and N3 disease was significantly different (P < 0.001). When LNR and TNM nodal groupings were included together in the Cox analysis, both groupings had independent prognostic significance (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The most significant LNR threshold value separating patients in low-risk and high-risk groups in terms of disease recurrence was 0.20 for N1 disease (P < 0.001), 0.35 for N2 disease (P < 0.001), and 0.90 for N3 disease (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node ratio and TNM nodal groupings show no superiority over each other in categorizing patients with node-positive breast carcinoma into prognostic groups of low-, intermediate-, and high-risk. However, LNR grouping may supplement TNM nodal classification by categorizing patients within each TNM nodal group into low-risk and high-risk groups with significantly different survival.
    World Journal of Surgery 02/2013; · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Due to the heterogeneity of lymph node examination and the conflicting results existing for the same classification of lymph node ratio (LNR), it is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic effects of different LNRs on breast cancer. PubMed, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched to find all published cohort studies that evaluated the prognostic value of different LNRs on breast cancer. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), breast cause-special survival (BCCS), mortality, locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant metastasis. Data was analyzed using comprehensive meta-analysis software version 2.0, and 23 studies were included. The available evidence showed that LNR was a prognostic predictor for breast cancer, especially for clinically node-positive breast cancer, but the available evidence could not judge which cutoff point is the most reliable. Meanwhile, the cutoff values 0.2 and 0.65 could be suitable to predict breast cancer OS, DFS, BCCS, and mortality.
    Breast Cancer 10/2013; · 1.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As few data are available on irradiation of the draining nodes after conservative surgery (CS), this study was designed to identify patients with T1-T2 breast cancer and one to three positive axillary nodes who needed regional radiotherapy (RT). Five hundred seventy-five patients were treated between 1988 and 2001 with CS and RT to the breast. All but three received adjuvant chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy. Risk factors for and the relationships between local, nodal and distant relapses were analyzed. At a median follow-up of 7.3 years, the 10-year probability of survival free of local relapse, nodal relapse and distant metastases were 92.8%, 94.0% and 84.9%, respectively. Independent predictors of local relapse were the positive/excised node ratio, margin status and age. Predictors of nodal relapse were tumor grade, hormone receptor and margin status. Significant risk factors for distant metastases were tumor stage, grade, hormone receptor and margin status. Local and nodal relapses were related significantly with distant metastases. Only local and distant relapses were linked by temporal sequence (P=0.03). Overall relapse rates were low in these patients and different mechanisms appeared to underlie local, nodal or distant relapse.
    Annals of Oncology 11/2010; 22(4):842-7. · 7.38 Impact Factor