Article

Young adolescents' perceptions, patterns, and contexts of energy drink use: A focus group study.

School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong Waterfront Campus, Victoria 3220, Australia
Appetite (Impact Factor: 2.54). 05/2014; DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.05.013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Caffeinated Energy Drinks (EDs) are purported to increase energy and improve performance, but have been associated with adverse health effects and death. EDs are popular among adolescents and young adults, yet little is known about their use among young adolescents. This study explored perceptions, patterns, and contexts of ED use in six focus groups with 40 adolescents aged 12-15 years from two regional Australian schools. A thematic analysis of the data was used to investigate knowledge about ED brands and content, ED use, reasons for ED use, physiological effects, and influences on ED use. Participants were familiar with EDs and most had used them at least once but had limited knowledge of ED ingredients, and some had difficulty differentiating them from soft and sports drinks. EDs were used as an alternative to other drinks, to provide energy, and in social contexts and their use was associated with short-term physiological symptoms. Parents and advertising influenced participants' perceptions and use of EDs. These findings suggest young adolescents use EDs without knowing what they are drinking and how they are contributing to their personal risk of harm. The advertising, appeal, and use of EDs by adolescents appears to share similarities with alcohol and tobacco. Further research is needed to replicate and extend the current findings, informed by the lessons learned in alcohol research.

1 Bookmark
 · 
57 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To identify factors associated with nonalcoholic carbonated beverage (soft drink) consumption in children. Mail-in surveys collected by Dragonfly, a children's educational magazine distributed nationally to elementary and middle schools, were analyzed. The survey included questions about frequency of soft drink consumption and factors related to soft drink consumption. SUBJECTS AND PARTICIPANTS: The sample consisted of 560 children, 8 to 13 years old, who completed and mailed in the survey. There was an equal distribution of boys and girls (51% and 49%, respectively). Frequency distributions were calculated and chi(2) tests were conducted to determine whether soft drink consumption and related factors varied by sex and age. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the association of soft drink consumption with each factor after adjustment for potential confounders. Preference for the taste of soft drinks was the strongest predictor in the analysis, with those who reported the strongest taste preference 4.50 times more likely (95% confidence interval=2.89-7.04) to consume soft drinks five or more times per week than those with a lower taste preference. Youth whose parents regularly drank soft drinks were 2.88 times more likely (95% confidence interval=1.76-4.72) to consume soft drinks five or more times per week compared with those whose parents did not regularly drink soft drinks. Results suggest that several factors may be associated with soft drink intake in school-aged children, most notably taste preferences, soft drink consumption habits of parents and friends, soft drink availability in the home and school, and television viewing. Additional research is needed to verify these findings in a representative sample of children.
    Journal of the American Dietetic Association 09/2004; 104(8):1244-9. · 3.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Through this past decade, health care research has focused on clinical trials and establishing intervention versus control group research to improve the health of children and adolescents. Many of these clinical intervention trials have not demonstrated significantly improved health for these persons. One possible reason for the failure to demonstrate improved health is that the young persons' perspective is lacking. Focus group method of data collection is an excellent vehicle to help gain the young person's perspective on a variety of issues related to health and wellness. Including the young person's perspective when designing a program may encourage this person to participate in the new initiative, which would ultimately improve the health of children and adolescents to a greater degree than when their perspective is not taken into account. This article discusses the use of focus groups as an important part of the research process in pediatric and adolescent populations.
    Journal of Pediatric Health Care 01/2005; 19(2):104-10. · 1.76 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Well-known reports suggest that the use of energy drinks might reduce the intensity of the depressant effects of alcohol. However, there is little scientific evidence to support this hypothesis. The present study aimed at evaluating the effects of the simultaneous ingestion of an alcohol (vodka(37.5%v/v)) and an energy drink (Red Bull-3.57 mL/kg), compared with those presented after the ingestion of an alcohol or an energy drink alone. Twenty-six young healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to 2 groups that received 0.6 or 1.0 g/kg alcohol, respectively. They all completed 3 experimental sessions in random order, 7 days apart: alcohol alone, energy drink alone, or alcohol plus energy drink. We evaluated the volunteers' breath alcohol concentration, subjective sensations of intoxication, objective effects on their motor coordination, and visual reaction time. When compared with the ingestion of alcohol alone, the ingestion of alcohol plus energy drink significantly reduced subjects' perception of headache, weakness, dry mouth, and impairment of motor coordination. However, the ingestion of the energy drink did not significantly reduce the deficits caused by alcohol on objective motor coordination and visual reaction time. The ingestion of the energy drink did not alter the breath alcohol concentration in either group. Even though the subjective perceptions of some symptoms of alcohol intoxication were less intense after the combined ingestion of the alcohol plus energy drink, these effects were not detected in objective measures of motor coordination and visual reaction time, as well as on the breath alcohol concentration.
    Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research 05/2006; 30(4):598-605. · 3.42 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
17 Downloads
Available from
Jun 26, 2014

View other sources