Article

Effect of P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux on cerebrospinal fluid concentrations in rhesus monkeys.

Department of Drug Metabolism, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA 19486, USA.
Biochemical pharmacology (Impact Factor: 4.25). 05/2009; 78(6):642-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.05.026
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Brain penetration of drugs which are subject to P-glycoprotein (Pgp)-mediated efflux is attenuated, as manifested by the fact that the cerebrospinal fluid concentration (C(CSF)), a good surrogate of the unbound brain concentration (C(ub)), is lower than the unbound plasma concentration (C(up)) for Pgp substrates. In rodents, the attenuation magnitude of brain penetration by Pgp-mediated efflux has been estimated by correlating the ratio of CSF to plasma exposures (C(CSF)/C(p)) with the unbound fraction in plasma (f(u)) upon the incorporation of the in vivo or in vitro Pgp-mediated efflux ratios (ERs). In the present work, we investigated the impact of Pgp-mediated efflux on C(CSF) in monkeys. Following intravenous administration to cisterna magna ported rhesus monkeys, the CSF and plasma concentrations were determined for 25 compounds from three discovery programs. We also evaluated their f(u) in rhesus plasma and ER in human and African green monkey MDR-transfected LLC-PK1 cells. These compounds varied significantly in the f(u) (0.025-0.73), and 24 out of 25 are considered Pgp substrates based on their appreciable directional transport (ER>2). The C(CSF)/C(p) was significantly lower than the corresponding f(u) (>or=3-fold) for 16 compounds regardless of a significant correlation (R(2)=0.59, p=4 x 10(-5)) when the C(CSF)/C(p) was plotted against the f(u). When the f(u) was normalized to the ER (f(u)/ER) the correlation was improved (R(2)=0.75, p=8 x 10(-8)). More importantly, only one compound showed the C(CSF)/C(p) that exceeded 3-fold of the normalized f(u). The results suggest that the impact of Pgp-mediated efflux in monkeys, similar to the case in rodents, is reasonably reflected by the gradient between the free concentrations in plasma and in CSF. Therefore, f(u) and Pgp ER may serve as useful measurements in estimating in vivo C(CSF)/C(p) ratios in monkeys, and potentially in humans.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
105 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Optimising drug properties can be an important strategy to limit penetration into the CNS and offers advantages in reducing the risk of undesirable neurological effects When considering the design of these drugs it is important to consider the relative influx and efflux rates at the relevant biological membranes The highest degree of restriction at the brain is probably achievable by utilising active transport to exclude compounds from the brain Affinity for the efflux transporters Pgp and BCRP has been achieved in two in-house chemistry programmes by increasing polar surface area, which resulted in highly orally bioavailable low CNS penetrant compounds in preclinical species.
    Xenobiotica 01/2012; 42(1):11-27. · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Animal models are used commonly in various stages of drug discovery and development to aid in the prospective assessment of drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential and the understanding of the underlying mechanism for DDI of a drug candidate. In vivo assessments in an appropriate animal model can be very valuable, when used in combination with in vitro systems, to help verify in vivo relevance of the in vitro animal-based results, and thus substantiate the extrapolation of in vitro human data to clinical outcomes. From a pharmacokinetic standpoint, a key consideration for rational selection of an animal model is based on broad similarities to humans in important physiological and biochemical parameters governing drug absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion (ADME) processes in question for both the perpetrator and victim drugs. Equally critical are specific in vitro and/or in vivo experiments to demonstrate those similarities, usually both qualitative and quantitative, in the ADME properties/processes under investigation. In this review, theoretical basis and specific examples are presented to illustrate the utility of the animal models in assessing the potential and understanding the mechanisms of DDIs.
    Pharmaceutical Research 09/2010; 27(9):1772-87. · 4.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The unbound drug concentration in brain parenchyma is considered to be the relevant driver for interaction with CNS biological targets. Drug levels in cerebrospinal fluid (C_CSF) are frequently used surrogates for the unbound concentrations in brain. For drugs actively transported across the blood-brain barrier (BBB), C_CSF differs from unbound plasma concentration (Cu_p) to an extent that is commonly unknown. In this study, the relationship between CSF-to-unbound plasma drug partitioning in rats and the mouse Pgp (Mdr1a) efflux ratio (ER) obtained from in vitro transcellular studies has been investigated for a set of 61 CNS compounds exhibiting substantial diversity in chemical structure and physico-chemical properties. In order to understand the in vitro-in vivo extrapolation of Pgp efflux, a mechanistic model was derived relating in vivo CNS distribution kinetics to in vitro active transport. The model was applied to predict C_CSF from Cu_p and ER data for 19 proprietary Roche CNS drug candidates. The calculated CSF concentrations were correlated with CNS pharmacodynamic responses observed in rodent models. The correlation between in vitro and in vivo potency for different pharmacological endpoints indicated that the predicted C_CSF is a valuable surrogate of the concentration at the target site. Overall, C_CSF proved superior description of PK/PD data than unbound plasma or total brain concentration for Mdr1a substrates. Predicted C_CSF can be used as a default approach to understand the PK/PD relationships in CNS efficacy models and can support the extrapolation of efficacious brain exposure for new drug candidates from rodent to man.
    Biochemical pharmacology 02/2013; · 4.25 Impact Factor