Association of Concomitant Fibromyalgia With Worse Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and Short Form 36 Scores in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Arthritis & Rheumatology (Impact Factor: 7.76). 06/2009; 61(6):794-800. DOI: 10.1002/art.24430
Source: PubMed


To study the association of the presence of fibromyalgia (FM) with the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
A total of 270 outpatients with RA were enrolled in a prospective cross-sectional study. The patients underwent clinical evaluation and application of the HAQ and SF-36 questionnaires. Disease activity was evaluated using the DAS28 score. FM and RA diagnoses were made according to American College of Rheumatology criteria.
The overall prevalence of FM was 13.4%. This group of patients had a higher prevalence of female sex, older mean age, higher functional class, and longer morning stiffness than patients with only RA. Mean +/- SD DAS28 scores were significantly higher in patients with RA and FM (5.36 +/- 0.99) than in patients with RA only (4.03 +/- 1.39; P < 0.001). In a multivariable linear regression analysis, FM was an important predictor of the DAS28 score, even after adjusting for the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, number of swollen joints, functional class, number of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs currently in use, current dose of steroids, and articular erosions. HAQ and SF-36 scores were also worse in patients with RA and associated FM.
FM is related to worse scores on the DAS28, HAQ, and SF-36 in patients with RA. The presence of FM may have major implications in the interpretation of the DAS28 score because it is related to higher scores independently of objective evidence of RA activity.

Download full-text


Available from: Markus Bredemeier, Jan 30, 2015
1 Follower
49 Reads
  • Source
    • "Regarding the treatment of our studied patients, the number of patients receiving steroids and the cumulative steroid dose were both higher in the RAF group with a significant statistical difference regarding steroid cumulative dose. These results are in accordance with those of Ranzolin and colleagues [8]. This may reflect a response to the higher disease activity indices reported in RAF patients. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim of workTo explore the influence of the presence of concomitant fibromyalgia (FM) on the evaluation of disease activity score assessing 28 joints (DAS28), clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and modified health assessment questionnaire (MHAQ) in Egyptian patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Patients and methodsThis study included 50 female RA patients; out of which 25 had concomitant FM (RAF group), the other 25 RA patients who served as controls did not have concomitant FM (RA group). All patients were subjected to an assessment of disease activity using the DAS 28 and the CDAI and assessment of functional outcome using MHAQ score.ResultsThe mean DAS 28 was significantly higher in RAF than RA patients (5.6 ± 1.1 versus 4.5 ± 1.3, P = 0.009). Also, the mean CDAI score was significantly higher in the RAF group (mean 23.3 ± 12.1 versus 13.7 ± 11.0, P = 0.002). The difference was attributed to significantly higher subjective items such as Tender joint count (TJC) and patient’s global assessment of general health (VAS-GH) in the RAF group. Mean MHAQ score was also higher in the RAF group (0.7 ± 0.6 versus 0.31 ± 0.4, P = 0.006).ConclusionFM is related to worse scores on the DAS28, CDAI and MHAQ in patients with RA. The presence of FM may have major implications in the interpretation of the DAS28 and CDAI scores because it is related to higher scores independently of objective evidence of RA activity.
    Egyptian Rheumatologist 07/2013; 35(3):115–119. DOI:10.1016/j.ejr.2013.03.003
  • Source
    • "In our review of literature QoL score were relatively low for Iranian patients. In studies of Ranzolin (31), Tander (7) and Lapsley (32), SF-36 scores was 55.5, 54.4 and 55.5 which were comparable with our study. Whereas, study of Lima et al (33) in Brazil showed QoL score with SF-36 was 75.4, "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disorder that leads to joint swelling, stiffness, pain and progressive joint destruction. It is a common disease with prevalence of 1% worldwide that affecting all aspects of patients' lives. Therefore, this study was conducted to summarize and provide a clear view of quality of life among the patients in Iran through a literature review. This study was conducted as a literature review over article published between 2000 to 2013, by using data bases comprise of Google scholar, Science Direct, Pubmed, IRANDOC, SID, Medlib, Magiran and by key words: "quality of life", "rheumatoid arthritis", "Iran" and their Persian equivalents. Finally 2065 articles assessed and according to the aim of the study are 11 studies synthesized. Extracted results first were summarized in Extraction Table, and then analyzed manually. In reviewed articles rheumatoid arthritis patients' quality of life was measured by using five different tools, the most important one of them was SF36 questionnaire. Among eight dimensions of SF36 questionnaire, the highest mean according included articles result was social functioning with average score of 63.4 and the lowest for physical limitation (physical role functioning) with score of 43. Overall, mean of eight dimensions was 52.47. The most important factors affecting quality of life were disease severity and pain, depression, income, educational, occupational status, married status, sign of disease, fatigue, anxiety and disease activity scores. The results of the study showed relatively low quality of life of rheumatoid arthritis patients in Iran. Empowering patients by participating them in service delivery process and decision making can improves quality of life and in this regard health care provider must be focused on patient self-care abilities and reinforcing this factor by training them.
    Materia Socio Medica 03/2013; 25(3):158-62. DOI:10.5455/msm.2013.25.158-162
  • Source
    • "These factors can consequently influence pain measurements (TJC, global pain), assessments in which pain is included (DAS28, SHS symptoms, HBI) or assessments that are affected by pain (HAQ, DLQI, SHS). In the case of RA, concomitant fibromyalgia could also influence pain measurements [49]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and psoriasis are immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with similarities in pathophysiology, and all can be treated with similar biological agents. Previous studies have shown that there are gender differences with regard to disease characteristics in RA and IBD, with women generally having worse scores on pain and quality of life measurements. The relationship is less clear for psoriasis. Because treatment differences between men and women could explain the dissimilarities, we investigated gender differences in the disease characteristics before treatment initiation and in the biologic treatment prescribed. Data on patients with RA or IBD were collected from two registries in which patients treated with biologic medication were enrolled. Basic demographic data and disease activity parameters were collected from a time point just before the initiation of the biologic treatment. For patients with psoriasis, the data were taken from the 2010 annual report of the Swedish Psoriasis Register for systemic treatment, which included also non-biologic treatment. For all three diseases, the prescribed treatment and disease characteristics were compared between men and women. In total, 4493 adult patients were included in the study (1912 with RA, 131 with IBD, and 2450 with psoriasis). Most of the treated patients with RA were women, whereas most of the patients with IBD or psoriasis were men. There were no significant differences between men and women in the choice of biologics. At treatment start, significant gender differences were seen in the subjective disease measurements for both RA and psoriasis, with women having higher (that is, worse) scores than men. No differences in objective measurements were found for RA, but for psoriasis men had higher (that is, worse) scores for objective disease activity measures. A similar trend to RA was seen in IBD. Women with RA or psoriasis scored significantly higher on subjective, but not on objective, disease activity measures than men, and the same trend was seen in IBD. This indicates that at the same level of treatment, the disease has a greater effect in women. These findings might suggest that in all three diseases, subjective measures are discounted to some extent in the therapeutic decision-making process, which could indicate undertreatment in female patients.
    BMC Medicine 08/2012; 10(1):82. DOI:10.1186/1741-7015-10-82 · 7.25 Impact Factor
Show more