A Broken Trust: Lessons from the Vaccine–Autism Wars

PLoS Biology, Public Library of Science, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
PLoS Biology (Impact Factor: 11.77). 06/2009; 7(5):e1000114. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000114
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Researchers long ago rejected the theory that vaccines cause autism, yet many parents don't believe them. Can scientists bridge the gap between evidence and doubt?

Download full-text


Available from: Liza Gross, Aug 04, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The future of nanotechnology rests upon approaches to making new, useful nanomaterials and testing them in complex systems. Currently, the advance from discovery to application is constrained in nanomaterials relative to a mature market, as seen in molecular and bulk matter. To reap the benefits of nanotechnology, improvements in characterization are needed to increase throughput as creativity outpaces our ability to confirm results. The considerations of research, commerce, and regulation are part of a larger feedback loop that illustrates a mutual need for rapid, easy, and standardized characterization of a large property matrix. Now, we have an opportunity and a need to strike a new balance that drives higher quality research, simplifies commercial exploitation, and allows reasoned regulatory approaches.
    ACS Nano 09/2009; 3(9):2441-6. DOI:10.1021/nn901112p · 12.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Internet plays a large role in disseminating anti-vaccination information. This paper builds upon previous research by analyzing the arguments proffered on anti-vaccination websites, determining the extent of misinformation present, and examining discourses used to support vaccine objections. Arguments around the themes of safety and effectiveness, alternative medicine, civil liberties, conspiracy theories, and morality were found on the majority of websites analyzed; misinformation was also prevalent. The most commonly proposed method of combating this misinformation is through better education, although this has proven ineffective. Education does not consider the discourses supporting vaccine rejection, such as those involving alternative explanatory models of health, interpretations of parental responsibility, and distrust of expertise. Anti-vaccination protestors make postmodern arguments that reject biomedical and scientific "facts" in favour of their own interpretations. Pro-vaccination advocates who focus on correcting misinformation reduce the controversy to merely an "educational" problem; rather, these postmodern discourses must be acknowledged in order to begin a dialogue.
    Vaccine 02/2010; 28(7):1709-16. DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022 · 3.49 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pertussis vaccination has been alleged to cause an encephalopathy that involves seizures and subsequent intellectual disability. In a previous retrospective study, 11 of 14 patients with so-called vaccine encephalopathy had Dravet syndrome that was associated with de-novo mutations of the sodium channel gene SCN1A. In this study, we aimed to establish whether the apparent association of Dravet syndrome with vaccination was caused by recall bias and, if not, whether vaccination affected the onset or outcome of the disorder. We retrospectively studied patients with Dravet syndrome who had mutations in SCN1A, whose first seizure was a convulsion, and for whom validated source data were available. We analysed medical and vaccination records to investigate whether there was an association between vaccination and onset of seizures in these patients. Patients were separated into two groups according to whether seizure onset occurred shortly after vaccination (vaccination-proximate group) or not (vaccination-distant group). We compared clinical features, intellectual outcome, and type of SCN1A mutation between the groups. Dates of vaccination and seizure onset were available from source records for 40 patients. We identified a peak in the number of patients who had seizure onset within 2 days after vaccination. Thus, patients who had seizure onset on the day of or the day after vaccination (n=12) were included in the vaccination-proximate group and those who had seizure onset 2 days or more after vaccination (n=25) or before vaccination (n=3) were included in the vaccination-distant group. Mean age at seizure onset was 18.4 weeks (SD 5.9) in the vaccination-proximate group and 26.2 weeks (8.1) in the vaccination-distant group (difference 7.8 weeks, 95% CI 2.6-13.1; p=0.004). There were no differences in intellectual outcome, subsequent seizure type, or mutation type between the two groups (all p values >0.3). Furthermore, in a post-hoc analysis, intellectual outcome did not differ between patients who received vaccinations after seizure onset and those who did not. Vaccination might trigger earlier onset of Dravet syndrome in children who, because of an SCN1A mutation, are destined to develop the disease. However, vaccination should not be withheld from children with SCN1A mutations because we found no evidence that vaccinations before or after disease onset affect outcome.
    The Lancet Neurology 06/2010; 9(6):592-8. DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70107-1 · 21.82 Impact Factor
Show more