Safety and tolerability of seasonal ultra-rush, high-dose sublingual- swallow immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis to grass and tree pollens: an observational study in 193 children and adolescents

Klinik für Pädiatrische Pneumologie und Allergologie, Neonatologie und Intensivmedizin, Elisabeth-Kinderkrankenhaus, Oldenburg, Germany.
Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology: official organ of the International Association of Asthmology (INTERASMA) and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Alergia e Inmunología (Impact Factor: 2.6). 02/2009; 19(2):125-31.
Source: PubMed


We conducted a large observational study in 193 children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis due to grass or tree pollens to evaluate the safety and tolerability of an ultrarush high-dose sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) regimen reaching a maintenance dose of 300 index of reactivity within 90 minutes.
Children and adolescents aged 5 to 17 years with at least a 1-year medical history of allergic rhinitis with or without mild to moderate asthma due to tree pollens (birch, alder, hazel) or grass pollens (cocksfoot, meadow grass, rye grass, sweet vernal grass, timothy) were recruited. Standardized grass and tree pollen allergen extracts were used for ultrarush titration and subsequent coseasonal maintenance.
During ultrarush titration, 60 patients (31%) reported 117 predominantly mild and local adverse events, which resolved within 150 minutes. During the maintenance phase, 562 adverse events were reported; the most frequent local events were oral pruritus, burning sensation, lip or tongue swelling, and gastrointestinal symptoms, and the most frequent systemic events were rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. There was 1 clinically significant asthma event in an 11-year old boy with known asthma in whom SLIT was resumed after an interval of 4 days.
Ultrarush titration was safe and well tolerated. Pediatric patients with asthma should be carefully monitored and adequately trained to use their rescue medications.

Download full-text


Available from: Jochen Sieber, Jun 18, 2015
10 Reads
  • Source
    World Allergy Organization Journal 01/2007; DOI:10.1097/01.WOX.0000301986.60236.8c
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sublingual (SLIT) and oral immunotherapy (OIT) are two variants of immunotherapy that might be especially of interest for children. After adult studies, lately many trials in children are published. However, the quality of published material varies. In the present review we analyze paediatric SLIT publications from the past 2 years in the light of a new system of evaluation of quality of evidence, the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation system. High quality evidence in children: high-dose daily grass SLIT reduces symptoms and medication use; low-dose pollen SLIT reduces the development of new sensitizations. Low-dose SLIT reduces symptoms and medication in mild-moderate atopic dermatitis. Latex SLIT for 3 years results in a negative glove test. The evidence for the effectiveness of SLIT for seasonal and perennial asthma is still of moderate-low quality, as is the evidence for asthma prevention. Too high dose of mite SLIT seems ineffective for asthma. Oral allergen immunotherapy is promising for some food allergies. Some definite immunological changes are seen with SLIT; facilitated antibody presentation and IL-17 might correlate with efficacy. Even after a hundred years of immunotherapy, it is still an ever changing field with SLIT and OIT making fast progress.
    Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology 10/2009; 9(6):558-67. DOI:10.1097/ACI.0b013e328332b8fa · 3.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: No studies have directly compared the effects of immunotherapy and antileukotrienes due to the long time required to appreciate the clinical effects of immunotherapy. We compared the effect of montelukast (MK) and SLIT added to standard therapy in moderate asthma over 5 years. Open randomized controlled trial. Patients with moderate asthma (and rhinitis) solely due to birch pollen were randomized to receive either MK (10 mg/d) or birch sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in the pollen seasons, in addition to formoterol/fluticasone. All the patients also received salbutamol and cetirizine as rescue medications. Asthma and rhinitis symptoms were recorded on diary cards from February to May at baseline and after 3 and 5 years of study. In-season nasal eosinophils and bronchial hyperresponsiveness were also evaluated. Thirty-three adult patients were enrolled and 29 completed the study. The groups were homogeneous at baseline. Bronchial and nasal symptom scores were lower at 3 and 5 years compared to baseline in the SLIT group. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness and bronchodilator use decreased significantly in both groups at 5 years, but only in the SLIT group at 3 years. In the SLIT group there was a significant decrease in nasal eosinophils compared to baseline and to the MK group. In patients with birch pollen-induced moderate asthma and rhinitis, the addition of SLIT provides a greater clinical benefit than that of MK.
    Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology: official organ of the International Association of Asthmology (INTERASMA) and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Alergia e Inmunología 01/2010; 20(2):146-52. · 2.60 Impact Factor
Show more