Article

Immunomodulation in the critically ill

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.
BJA British Journal of Anaesthesia (Impact Factor: 4.35). 08/2009; 103(1):70-81. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aep128
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Immunotherapy in the critically ill is an appealing notion because of the apparent abnormal immune and inflammatory responses seen in so many patients. The administration of a medication that could alter immune responses and decrease mortality in patients with sepsis could represent a 'magic bullet'. Various approaches have been tried over the last 20 yr: steroids; anti-endotoxin or anti-cytokine antibodies; cytokine receptor antagonists; and other agents with immune-modulating side-effects. However, in some respects, research along these lines has been unsuccessful or disappointing at best. The current state of knowledge is summarized with particular reference to sepsis and the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Helen F Galley, Oct 23, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
74 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a recent issue of Critical Care, Qiao and colleagues showed in a rat model of sepsis that dexmedetomidine and midazolam suppress the generation of pro-inflammatory mediators but the effects vary between agents. While dexmedetomidine limited apoptosis to a greater extent than midazolam, both agents significantly reduced short-term mortality compared with saline. This study, in addition to those by others, suggests there are disparate immunomodulating effects between sedatives. Clinical studies are warranted to investigate whether these effects impact outcomes of septic patients. Perhaps one day the choice of sedative in septic patients will not be based solely on sedative properties but rather immunosedative profiles.
    Critical care (London, England) 10/2009; 13(5):191. DOI:10.1186/cc8034
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Monitoring treatment response in invasive aspergillosis is challenging, because an immunocompromised host may not exhibit reliable symptoms and clinical signs. Cytokines play a pivotal role in mediating host immune response to infection; therefore, the profiling of biomarkers may be an appropriate surrogate for disease status. We studied, in a cohort of 119 patients with invasive aspergillosis who were recruited in a multicenter clinical trial, serum interleukin (IL)-6, IL‐8, IL‐10, interferon‐γ, and C‐reactive protein (CRP) trends over the first 4 weeks of therapy and correlated these trends to clinical outcome parameters. Circulating IL‐6 and CRP levels were high at initiation of therapy and generally showed a downward trend with antifungal treatment. However, subjects with adverse outcomes exhibited a distinct lack of decline in IL‐6 and CRP levels at week 1, compared with responders (P = .02, for both IL‐6 and CRP). Nonresponders also had significantly elevated IL‐8 levels (P = .001). High initial IL‐8 and persistently elevated IL‐6, IL‐8, and CRP levels after initiation of treatment may be early predictors of adverse outcome in invasive aspergillosis. Cytokine and CRP profiles could be used for early identification of patients with a poor response to antifungal treatment who may benefit from more‐aggressive antimicrobial regimens.
    The Journal of Infectious Diseases 09/2010; 202(9):1454-62. DOI:10.1086/656527 · 5.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The sepsis syndromes, frequently complicated by pulmonary and cardiac dysfunction, remain a major cause of death amongst the critically ill. Targeted therapies aimed at ameliorating the systemic inflammation that characterises the sepsis syndromes have largely yielded disappointing results in clinical trials. Whilst there are many potential reasons for lack of success of clinical trials, one possibility is that the pathways targeted, to date, are only modifiable very early in the course of the illness. More recent approaches have therefore attempted to identify pathways that could offer a wider therapeutic window, such as the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) and its ligands. The objectives of this study were to review the evidence supporting the role of the RAGE axis in systemic inflammation and associated acute lung injury and myocardial dysfunction, to explore some of the problems and conflicts that these RAGE studies have raised and to consider strategies by which they might be resolved. MEDLINE was searched (1990-2010) and relevant literature collected and reviewed. RAGE is an inflammation-perpetuating receptor with a diverse range of ligands. Evidence supporting a role of the RAGE axis in the pathogenesis of systemic inflammation, ALI and myocardial dysfunction is compelling with numerous animal experiments showing the beneficial effects of inhibiting the RAGE axis. Despite a number of unanswered questions that need to be further addressed, the potential for inhibiting RAGE-mediated inflammation in humans undoubtedly exists.
    Intensive Care Medicine 10/2010; 36(10):1644-56. DOI:10.1007/s00134-010-1952-z · 7.21 Impact Factor
Show more