Article

[Hemodynamic effects of aortic occlusion during inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane and sevoflurane: experimental study in dogs].

Departamento de Anestesiologia, FCM, UNICAMP, Brazil.
Revista brasileira de anestesiologia 07/2006; 56(3):239-52.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Aortic flow suppression and release during aortic procedures promote major hemodynamic disorders. This study aimed at evaluating these disorders in dogs anesthetized with isoflurane or sevoflurane.
This study involved 41 dogs divided in two groups according to the anesthetic agent used for maintenance with 1 MAC: GI (n = 21) isoflurane; GS (n = 20) sevoflurane. Aorta was occluded by intra-arterial infra-diafragmatic cuff inflation for 30 minutes. Hemodynamic parameters were observed in moments M1 (control), M2 and M3, 15 and 30 minutes after aortic occlusion, M4 and M5, 15 and 30 minutes after cuff deflation.
During aortic occlusion there has been increased mean blood pressure (MBP), central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR), without increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and cardiac output (CO). CO was more stable with isoflurane as compared to sevoflurane where it has decreased after occlusion. Heart rate has initially decreased followed by increase during occlusion, being more expressive in GS as compared to GI, however without statistically significant difference between groups. Systolic volume was not importantly changed; left and right ventricular function have similarly increased after occlusion for both groups. With flow release, MBP, CVP, PAP, PCWP and SVR have decreased, and PVR has increased for both groups; ventricular function has abruptly decreased.
This study has shown that isoflurane is a better indication for such interventions for promoting less hemodynamic changes.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
36 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Different pharmacological approaches have been used in the control of cardiovascular responses to surgical infra-renal aortic occlusion (AXC). The aim of the present study was to explore the modulatory effects of desflurane (DES) on these responses. The study was performed in normoventilated chloralose-anesthetized pigs (n = 14). Measurements included cardiac output (CO), pulmonary vascular pressures, heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure proximal to the AXC site (MAPPROX). Renal arterial (QREN) and portal venous (QPORT) blood flows were measured ultrasonically. Systemic (SVR), preportal (RPORT) and renal (RREN) vascular resistances were derived. Sets of measurements were done a) prior to, b) during and c) 5 min after AXC. This was repeated, in a randomized fashion, at control (no DES) and with 4.9% and 9.8% DES, respectively. DES decreased MAPPROX, CO, HR, SVR, RREN and RPORT. At control, AXC increased MAPPROX (+27%), SVR (+27%), QPORT (+14%), RPORT (+12%) and RREN (+43%). DES 4.9% did not change this response pattern. With 9.8% DES, the AXC-induced increases in MAPPROX (+17%) and SVR (+21%) were attenuated. At this stage, AXC caused no demonstrable changes in RREN or RPORT, while both QREN (+16%) and QPORT increased (+9%). DES effectively controlled increases in proximal blood pressure during AXC. The increases in RREN and RPORT that were seen during AXC at control were inhibited by 9.8% DES. Consequently, at this DES dose, both QREN and QPORT increased during AXC.
    Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 10/1996; 40(8 Pt 1):876-82. · 2.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aortic cross-clamping for reconstructive aortic surgery is associated with impairment of renal function. Halothane or isoflurane was used to assess the influence of volatile anesthesia on renal hemodynamics during aortic surgery. Nineteen patients with normal preoperative creatinine clearances who were scheduled for reconstructive aortic surgery were randomly divided into two groups: halothane group (n = 9) and isoflurane group (n = 10). Induction of anesthesia consisted of midazolam, fentanyl, and pancuronium. Anesthesia was maintained with fentanyl and halothane or isoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen (50/50). Systemic hemodynamics were similar in both groups throughout surgery. Before aortic cross-clamping, effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) (131I-hippuran clearance) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (99Tc-DTPA clearance) were significantly lower in the halothane group (118.4 +/- 25.6 and 19.7 +/- 5.2 mL/min, respectively) than in the isoflurane group (253.4 +/- 51.5 and 44.9 +/- 8.4 mL/min) (P less than 0.05 for both). During cross-clamping, the renal variables were not markedly affected in either group and remained higher in the isoflurane-anesthetized patients (232.9 +/- 47.1 and 49.5 +/- 1.2 mL/min for ERPF and GFR, respectively) than in the halothane-anesthetized patients (132.4 +/- 31.6 and 14.8 +/- 3.7 mL/min, respectively) (P less than 0.05). After aortic unclamping, ERPF increased markedly in both groups (467.8 +/- 122 and 362.5 +/- 57.7 mL/min in the halothane and isoflurane groups, respectively), as did GFR (74.8 +/- 22 and 71.8 +/- 13.1 mL/min, respectively). These results suggest that anesthesia with halothane is associated with transient renal vasoconstriction during abdominal surgery. In contrast, aortic cross-clamping during isoflurane anesthesia was not associated with renal hemodynamic impairment.
    Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 07/1992; 6(3):295-8. · 1.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The interaction between myocardial and vascular effects of anesthetics has a potential impact on how these drugs influence performance of the heart. Most studies have focused on volatile anesthetic effects on the left ventricle (LV) and systemic circulation. Whether the right ventricle (RV) and pulmonary circulation respond in a similar fashion, however, is unclear. In the present study, we therefore examined the dose-related effects of isoflurane on LV and RV contractility and total afterload and related changes to simultaneous effects on the hydraulic power generated by each chamber. Two groups of swine were studied: one received no additional treatment before isoflurane (ISO, n = 6), and the other received hexamethonium, atropine, and propranolol to produce autonomic blockade before isoflurane administration (ISO+AB, n = 4). For each experiment, measurements were made of RV and LV regional segment lengths and pressures, along with proximal aortic and pulmonary arterial (PA) blood flow and pressure during the administration of 0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) isoflurane. Contractility was assessed by calculating the regional preload recruitable stroke work slope (PRSW). Afterload was characterized in both nonpulsatile and pulsatile terms by calculating aortic input impedance magnitude (Z). From these data, total arterial resistance (R), characteristic impedance (ZC), and vascular compliance (C) were determined with reference to a three-element Windkessel model of the circulation. Additionally, steady-state (WSS), oscillatory (WOS), and total (WT) hydraulic power output of each ventricle was calculated. In the ISO group, isoflurane produced a nearly threefold greater decrease of peak systolic pressure in the LV than in the RV, yet the dose-related decrease of regional PRSW was virtually the same in both chambers. In the aorta, isoflurane produced a maximal 25% reduction in R at 1.0 MAC and doubled C without a significant change in ZC. Alternatively, PA R was increased from baseline at 1.0 and 1.5 MAC, whereas ZC was increased from all other values at 1.5 MAC. PA C was not altered by isoflurane. In ISO+AB pigs, PA ZC at baseline was higher than that evident in ISO animals but was not altered by isoflurane. In contrast, baseline aortic R was lower in ISO+AB pigs but was still modestly reduced by 1.0 MAC isoflurane. In ISO animals, WT and WSS from both ventricles demonstrated dose-related decreases, but the reductions in LV WTand WSS were greater than those for the RV at all doses. Accordingly, the power requirement per unit flow decreased for the LV but remained constant for the RV. WOS for both ventricles was also reduced by isoflurane. However, the LV WOS to WT ratio increased, which indicates that more power was lost to the system by pulsation. In contrast, reductions in RV WT and WOS were nearly parallel at all isoflurane doses, and the WOS to WT ratio was unchanged. In the ISO+AB group, isoflurane-induced alterations in LV and RV power characteristics were similar to those in the ISO group. These data indicate that, despite similar effects on biventricular contractility, isoflurane exerts qualitatively different effects on RV and LV afterload, in part via alteration in autonomic nervous activity, that influence the distribution of power output between steady-state and pulsatile components. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, we examined the effects of isoflurane on cardiac performance in swine and found that, although the drug depresses contraction of both the left and right ventricles similarly, it has different effects on forces that oppose the ejection of blood. These findings demonstrate that the two interdependent pumps that comprise the heart can be influenced differently by anesthetic drugs.
    Anesthesia & Analgesia 10/1998; 87(3):511-21. · 3.30 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
4 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014