Upfront thrombus aspiration in primary coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction: report of the VAMPIRE (VAcuuM asPIration thrombus REmoval) trial.

Department of Cardiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions (Impact Factor: 7.44). 08/2008; 1(4):424-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.06.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study evaluated safety and efficacy of upfront thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Distal embolization during primary PCI results in reduced myocardial perfusion and poor clinical outcomes.
The VAMPIRE (VAcuuM asPIration thrombus REmoval) study was a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial conducted in 23 institutions. Patients (N = 355) presenting within 24 h of STEMI symptoms onset were randomized to primary PCI with (n = 180) or without (n = 175) upfront thrombus aspiration using Nipro's TransVascular Aspiration Catheter (Osaka, Japan).
The TransVascular Aspiration Catheter reached the lesion in 100% of cases. It successfully crossed the target obstruction in 86% without any delay in procedure time or time to reperfusion; whereas macroscopic thrombi were removed in 75% of the cases. Procedure success was similar between groups (98.9% vs. 98.3%). There was a trend toward lower incidence of slow or no reflow (primary end point-defined as a Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade <3) in patients treated with aspiration versus conventional primary PCI (12.4% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.07). Rate of myocardial blush grade 3 was higher in the aspiration group (46.0% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.001). Aspiration was most effective in patients presenting after 6 h of symptoms onset (slow flow rate: 8.1% vs. 37.6%, p = 0.01).
This study suggested the safety of primary PCI with upfront thrombectomy using a novel device in patients with STEMI. The study showed a trend toward improved myocardial perfusion and lower clinical events in patients treated with aspiration. Patients presenting late after STEMI appear to benefit the most from thrombectomy.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Myocardial tissue perfusion remains compromised in 30-40% of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) despite restored epicardial patency after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). This phenomenon is attributed to microvascular dysfunction secondary to numerous pathophysiological mechanisms, including distal embolisation of plaque and thrombus material. Its association with larger post-infarction myocardial necrosis, impaired left ventricular recovery, and worse clinical outcome illustrates the pertinence of a comprehensive armamentarium for the diagnosis, protection and treatment of microvascular dysfunction in STEMI patients. Current strategies to protect the microvasculature during pPCI are based on the assumption that distal embolisation of thrombotic and atheromatous debris is the main mechanism precipitating impaired myocardial tissue perfusion. However, recent findings suggest that this assumption is only true for the border zone of the ischaemic myocardium, whereas the infarct core consists of intramyocardial haemorrhage secondary to microvascular destruction, rather than obstruction. This observation has pertinent implications for contemporary and future adjuvant treatment strategies in STEMI patients. In this review, we provide an overview of the currently available armamentarium to assess the microvasculature, review contemporary strategies in pPCI to protect the myocardium, and discuss novel insights into microvascular pathophysiology that may help guide our focus from the coronary arteries to the microvasculature.
    EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology 08/2014; 10(T):T39-T46. DOI:10.4244/EIJV10STA8 · 3.76 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to synthesize evidence by examining the effects of manual thrombus aspiration on clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A total of 26 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), enrolling 11,780 patients, with 5,869 patients randomized to manual thrombus aspiration and 5,911 patients randomized to conventional percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), were included in the meta-analysis. Separate clinical outcome analyses were based on different follow-up periods. There were no statistically reductions in the incidences of mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.86 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73 to 1.02]), reinfarction (RR, 0.62 [CI, 0.31 to 1.32]) or target vessel revascularization (RR, 0.89 [CI, 0.75 to 1.05]) in the manual thrombus aspiration arm at 12 to 24 months of follow-up. The composite major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) outcomes were significantly lower in the manual thrombus aspiration arm over the long-term follow-up (RR, 0.76 [CI, 0.63 to 0.91]). A lower incidence of reinfarction was observed in the hospital to 30 days (RR, 0.59 [CI, 0.37 to 0.92]). The present meta-analysis suggested that there was no evidence that using manual thrombus aspiration in patients with STEMI could provide distinct benefits in long-term clinical outcomes.
    PLoS ONE 11/2014; 9(11):e113481. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0113481 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Routine use of distal protection for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not recommended. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of slow flow on mortality after STEMI, and the efficacy of adjunctive distal protection following primary thrombus aspiration. We retrospectively analyzed 414 STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI. Distal protection was used following primary thrombus aspiration only when the operator judged the patient to be at high risk of slow flow. Patients were divided into 3 groups: those receiving no thrombus aspiration (A- Group), thrombus aspiration without distal protection (A+/D- Group) or a combination of aspiration with distal protection (A+/D+ Group). Slow flow/no reflow was characterized as transient or persistent. The A-, A+/D-, and A+/D+ Groups consisted of 28.5 % (n = 118), 44.4 % (n = 184), and 27.1 % (n = 112) of patients, respectively. All-cause mortality at 180 days was 6.8 % without slow flow, 14.1 % with transient and 44.4 % with persistent slow flow (P < 0.0001), but was similar whether or not distal protection was used among these groups complicated without slow flow (A-, 8.7 %; A+/D-, 6.3 %; A+/D+, 4.3 %; P = 0.5854). However, in cases complicated with transient or persistent slow flow, distal protection reduced all-cause mortality to 38.5 % (A-), 23.3 % (A+/D-), and 10.8 % (A+/D+) at 180 days (P = 0.0114). Our data confirm that routine distal protection is not to be recommended. However, it is suggested that it could reduce mortality of patients with slow flow. Predicting slow flow accurately before PCI, however, remains a challenge.
    Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 09/2014; DOI:10.1007/s12928-014-0295-z

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 21, 2014