Hip Resurfacing versus Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Comparing Standardized Outcomes.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Impact Factor: 2.79). 04/2014; DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3556-3
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing was developed for younger, active patients as an alternative to THA, but it remains controversial. Study heterogeneity, inconsistent outcome definitions, and unstandardized outcome measures challenge our ability to compare arthroplasty outcomes studies.
We asked how early revisions or reoperations (within 5 years of surgery) and overall revisions, adverse events, and postoperative component malalignment compare among studies of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with THA among patients with hip osteoarthritis. Secondarily, we compared the revision frequency identified in the systematic review with revisions reported in four major joint replacement registries.
We conducted a systematic review of English language studies published after 1996. Adverse events of interest included rates of early failure, time to revision, revision, reoperation, dislocation, infection/sepsis, femoral neck fracture, mortality, and postoperative component alignment. Revision rates were compared with those from four national joint replacement registries. Results were reported as adverse event rates per 1000 person-years stratified by device market status (in use and discontinued). Comparisons between event rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and THA are made using a quasilikelihood generalized linear model. We identified 7421 abstracts, screened and reviewed 384 full-text articles, and included 236. The most common study designs were prospective cohort studies (46.6%; n = 110) and retrospective studies (36%; n = 85). Few randomized controlled trials were included (7.2%; n = 17).
The average time to revision was 3.0 years for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (95% CI, 2.95-3.1) versus 7.8 for THA (95% CI, 7.2-8.3). For all devices, revisions and reoperations were more frequent with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing than THA based on point estimates and CIs: 10.7 (95% CI, 10.1-11.3) versus 7.1 (95% CI, 6.7-7.6; p = 0.068), and 7.9 (95% CI, 5.4-11.3) versus 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.2; p = 0.084) per 1000 person-years, respectively. This difference was consistent with three of four national joint replacement registries, but overall national joint replacement registries revision rates were lower than those reported in the literature. Dislocations were more frequent with THA than metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: 4.4 (95% CI, 4.2-4.6) versus 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6-1.2; p = 0.008) per 1000 person-years, respectively. Adverse event rates change when discontinued devices were included.
Revisions and reoperations are more frequent and occur earlier with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing, except when discontinued devices are removed from the analyses. Results from the literature may be misleading without consistent definitions, standardized outcome metrics, and accounting for device market status. This is important when clinicians are assessing and communicating patient risk and when selecting which device is most appropriate for individual patients.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Second-generation cementless femoral components were designed to provide more reliable ingrowth and to limit distal osteolysis by incorporating circumferential proximal ingrowth surfaces. We examined the eight to eleven-year results of total hip arthroplasty with a cementless, anatomically designed femoral component and a cementless hemispheric acetabular component. Ninety-two consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties with implantation of a femoral component with a circumferential proximal porous coating (Anatomic Hip) and a cementless hemispheric porous-coated acetabular component (Harris-Galante II) were performed in eighty-five patients. These patients were prospectively followed clinically and radiographically. Six patients (seven hips) died and five patients (seven hips) were lost to follow-up, leaving seventy-four patients (seventy-eight hips) who had been followed for a mean of ten years (range, eight to eleven years). The mean age at the time of the arthroplasty was fifty-two years. The mean preoperative Harris hip score of 51 points improved to 94 points at the time of final follow-up; 86% of the hips had a good or excellent result. Thigh pain was reported as mild to severe after seven hip arthroplasties. No femoral component was revised for any reason, and none were loose radiographically at the time of the last follow-up. Two hips underwent acetabular revision (one because of dislocation and one because of loosening). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with revision or loosening of any component as the end point. The ten-year survival rate was 96.4% +/- 2.1% for the total hip prosthesis, 100% for the femoral component, and 96.4% +/- 2.1% for the acetabular component. Radiolucencies adjacent to the nonporous portion of the femoral component were seen in sixty-eight (93%) of the -seventy-three hips with complete radiographic follow-up. Femoral osteolysis proximal to the lesser trochanter was noted in four hips (5%). No osteolysis was identified distal to the lesser trochanter. Periacetabular osteolysis was identified in twelve hips (16%). Five patients underwent exchange of the acetabular liner because of polyethylene wear. This second-generation cementless, anatomically designed femoral component provided excellent clinical and radiographic results with a 100% survival rate at ten years. The circumferential porous coating of this implant improved ingrowth and prevented distal osteolysis at a mean of ten years after the arthroplasty.
    The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 12/2001; 83-A(11):1666-73. · 4.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A subjective, clinical, and radiographic comparison was made between 140 primary cemented and cementless femoral components in 70 patients <50 years old who underwent bilateral simultaneous total hip arthroplasty. The average duration of follow-up was 7.8 years (range, 7-9 years). Hip scores were similar in both groups at the final follow-up. The prevalence of transitory thigh pain was 17% in the cementless group and 3% in the cemented group. No hip had subsidence or aseptic loosening of the acetabular or femoral components in either group. One cemented hip was revised for late infection, and 1 cementless hip was revised for recurrent dislocation. There was no difference in the incidence of osteolysis in the femur (9% in the cemented hip vs 13% in the cementless hip) and acetabulum (9% each) between the groups.
    The Journal of Arthroplasty 06/2002; 17(4):434-40. · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This is a prospective study. . A total of 266 consecutive patients, who received 350 third-generation Zweymueller-SL total hip arthroplasties with metal-on-metal articulation for primary or secondary osteoarthritis, was followed and evaluated clinically, radiologically and histologically. The age of the patients at the time of surgery was 55+/-9 years, (range 25-70 years). Seven ( 3%) patients did not return for their last follow-up evaluation for reasons unrelated to their hip operation. The mean follow-up was 52 months (range 37-92 months). The preoperative Harris hip score was 45+/-19 and increased to 96+/-4 postoperatively. The invalidity of the patients was significantly improved postoperatively ( p<0.001). In all, 97% of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the result of the operation. There was no aseptic loosening noted in this series. Revision was done in 6 (1.8%) hips because of septic loosening ( n=5, 1.5%) or technical error ( n=1, 0.3%) during implantation. Dislocation of the prosthesis occurred in the early postoperative period in 2 (0.6%) hips. Periarticular ossification was observed in 30% of the hips (5% Brooker grades III and IV), but without associated disability. During revision surgery, no macroscopic metalosis could be identified in the newly formed hip joint membrane; however microscopic evidence for metalosis (Mirra grades 1 and 2) was seen in all revised hips. The survival for Zweymueller screw socket and stem 7.6 years after implantation was 99.4% and 96.8%, respectively. This study showed that the short-term results of Zweymueller total hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal articulation were just as satisfactory as those of a conventional polyethylene on ceramic articulation, while the metal-on-metal articulation does not seem to give rise to new problems or complications.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 03/2003; 123(1):5-11. · 1.31 Impact Factor


Available from
May 28, 2014