Article

[Modified mini-Hardinge access for hip prosthesis implantation in the supine position.]

Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie (Impact Factor: 0.57). 04/2014; DOI: 10.1007/s00064-012-0183-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Total hip arthroplasty with a minimal-incision technique that can be performed in the widely used supine position. The accustomed and good overview of this position allows safe positioning of the implant and combines this with the advantage of a soft tissue preserving technique. All standard instruments and implants can be further applied.
Primary and secondary coxarthrosis, femoral head necrosis.
Revision surgery, severe anatomic deformity, implantation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Supine position. The skin incision runs from the innominate tubercle proximally and falls slightly in the dorsal direction (20-30°). Incision of the iliotibial tract and exposure of the vastogluteal muscle sling. Starting from the greater trochanter, the sinewy onset of the minimal and medium gluteal muscle is split with an arched-shaped incision, which also falls proximally in the dorsal direction. Exposition of the joint capsule, longitudinal incision and resection of the ventrolateral parts. Dislocation of the hip by a combined adduction and external rotation movement. Osteotomy of the femoral neck and resection of the femoral head are performed in a figure-of-four position without adduction. To prepare the acetabulum and to insert the cup, the leg is placed in neutral position with a slight flexion of 20° in the hip. Preparation of the femur and implantation of the stem is again performed in a figure-of-four position in adduction. Reduction of the hip and stepwise wound closure.
Mobilization on postoperative day 1. Starting with half weight bearing and after completed wound healing rapid increase to full weight bearing. Intensive physiotherapy and rehabilitation. Thrombosis prophylaxis according to guidelines.
The mini-incision approach has successfully been used in our clinic for years. Between September 2004 and November 2005, the less-invasive technique was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial with 51 patients (52 hips). Compared to the standard approach a significantly shorter incision length (8.9 vs. 14.0 cm) and a slightly lower blood loss (502 vs. 660 ml) were observed for the modified mini-Hardinge. Moreover, the mini-incision group showed slightly better functional results in the early course. A higher rate of implant malpositioning or a higher peri- and postoperative complication rate was not observed.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
85 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A group of 42 primary total hip arthroplasties performed through an abridged surgical incision (group 1) was prospectively compared to a cohort of 42 primary total hip arthroplasties performed through a standard surgical incision (group 2). The length of the incision was 8.8 +/- 1.5 cm for group 1 and 23.0 +/- 2.1 cm for group 2. The groups were not significantly different with respect to age, height, preoperative Harris Hip scores (HHS), estimated blood loss, or length of hospital stay (P>.05). Group 1 patients had a lower body mass index than group 2 patients (P<.01). Length of surgery was slightly less for group I (P =.02). A 0% incidence was found of infection, nerve palsy, component malposition, and aseptic loosening in both groups. No dislocations occurred in group 1, and one dislocation occurred in group 2. Patients in group 1 have expressed considerable enthusiasm regarding the cosmetic appearance of the surgical incisions, and their postoperative HHS are slightly higher than those of group 2 (P =.042). Total hip arthroplasty can be performed safely and effectively through an abridged surgical incision, but this investigation confirms no dramatic clinical benefit other than cosmetic appeal.
    The Journal of Arthroplasty 08/2004; 19(5):538-45. DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.070 · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients without prior hip surgery and body mass index lower than 30 undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty were eligible to participate in a randomized prospective study comparing a minimally invasive with a standard approach. The patients were randomized to receive incisions of 8 cm (group A, n = 28) or 15 cm (group B, n = 32). The groups were similar demographically. Patients in group A had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (P < .003) and less total blood loss (P < .009). Fewer patients in group A limped at 6 weeks (P < .04). Operative time, transfusion requirements, narcotic usage, length of hospital stay, achievement of rehabilitation milestones, cane usage, and complications were similar in both groups. There was no difference between the groups at 1- and 2-year follow-up. Compared with a standard incision, patients who underwent a minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty demonstrated decreased blood loss and limped less at 6-week follow-up.
    The Journal of Arthroplasty 02/2005; 20(2):139-44. DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.061 · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In arthroplasty the term "minimal invasive" not only refers to the length of the skin incision but more so to its soft tissue and thereby muscle-protecting features. The aim of this study is to compare the early postoperative mobilisation and rehabilitation of the different surgical approaches in cementless total hip arthroplasty. 27 patients underwent a total hip replacement (Trilogy cup, MAYO stem) via a ventral minimal invasive approach (one incision technique) (MIS group). 23 patients underwent a total hip replacement with the same implant via a anterolateral transgluteal approach (standard group). We evaluated the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and patient satisfaction preoperatively as well as 3 days, 10 days, 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. After 3 and 10 days the MIS group showed better scores for pain, gait and mobilisation as well as for the overall HHS compared to the standard group. These differences could not be shown 6 weeks postoperatively. The MIS group had a significantly higher rate of complications with 22 % transient impairment of the lateral cutaneous nerve. The patients of the MIS group showed a better mobilisation and rehabilitation during the early postoperative period. This can be attributed to the lessened intraoperative damage of to soft tissue and especially muscle damage. Due to the increased rate of nerve irritations, we modified our surgical approach. The minimal invasive approach to modern hip joint arthroplasty remains a non-standard technique. Compared to the standard approach it carries additional risks (like nerve damage and malpositioning of the implants and thus should remain in the hands of the experienced orthopaedic surgeon in specialised orthopaedic centres.
    Zeitschrift für Orthopädie 01/2004; 142(6):685-90. · 0.86 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
4 Downloads
Available from
Feb 7, 2015