Exercise-induced dyspnea is a problem among the general adolescent population

Respiratory medicine (Impact Factor: 3.09). 06/2014; 108(6). DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.03.010


Respiratory symptoms during exercise are common and might limit adolescents' ability to take part in physical activity.

To estimate the prevalence, determinants and consequences of exercise- induced dyspnea (EID) on daily life in a general population of 12-13 year old adolescents.

A letter was sent to the parents of all 12–13 year old adolescents in the city of Uppsala (n=3838). Parents were asked to complete a questionnaire together with their child on EID, asthma and allergy, consequences for daily life (wheeze, day time- and nocturnal dyspnea) and physical activity.The response rate was 60% (n=2309).

Fourteen percent (n=330) reported EID, i.e. had experienced an attack of shortness of breath that occurred after strenuous activity within the last 12 months. Female gender, ever-asthma and rhinitis were independently associated with an increased risk of EID. Ever-asthma was reported by 14.6% (n=338), and 5.4% (n=128) had both EID and ever-asthma. Sixty-one percent (n=202) of the participants with EID did not have a diagnosis of asthma. In addition to rhinitis, participants with EID reported current wheeze and day-time as well as nocturnal dyspnea more often than the group without EID. No difference was found in the level of physical activity between participants with and without EID.

Adolescents with undiagnosed exercise-induced dyspnea have respiratory symptoms and are affected in daily life but have the same level of physical activity as adolescents without exercise-induced respiratory symptoms.

Download full-text


Available from: Christer Janson, Jul 30, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Exercise-induced respiratory symptoms are common among adolescents. Exercise is a known stimulus for transient narrowing of the airways, such as exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) and exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO). Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of EIB and EILO in a general population of adolescents. Methods In this cross-sectional study, a questionnaire on exercise-induced dyspnoea was sent to all adolescents born in 1997 and 1998 in Uppsala, Sweden (n=3838). A random subsample of 146 adolescents (99 with self-reported exercise-induced dyspnoea and 47 without this condition) underwent standardised treadmill exercise tests for EIB and EILO. The exercise test for EIB was performed while breathing dry air; a positive test was defined as a decrease of ≥10% in FEV1 from baseline. EILO was investigated using continuous laryngoscopy during exercise. Results The estimated prevalence of EIB and EILO in the total population was 19.2% and 5.7%, respectively. No gender differences were found. In adolescents with exercise-induced dyspnoea, 39.8% had EIB, 6% had EILO and 4.8% had both conditions. In this group, significantly more boys than girls had neither EIB nor EILO (64.7% vs 38.8%; p=0.026). There were no significant differences in body mass index, lung function, diagnosed asthma or medication between the participants with exercise-induced dyspnoea who had or did not have a positive EIB or EILO test result. Conclusions Both EIB and EILO are common causes of exercise-induced dyspnoea in adolescents. EILO is equally common among girls and boys and can coexist with EIB.
    Thorax 11/2014; 70(1). DOI:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205738 · 8.29 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The diagnosis of exercise-induced asthma or bronchospasm (EIB) is a complex dare in daily clinical practice. The consensus is that if bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is demonstrated in a patient with symptoms consistent with EIB, then that patient can be diagnosed with exercise-induced bronchospasm. The aim of this study is to determine which BHR test is the most efficient to diagnose EIB. Children under 16, without previous asthma diagnosis, or with stable asthma, complaining of asthma-like symptoms triggered by exercise were included. Bronchodilator, methacoline, mannitol and exercise tests were performed on all patients, following established protocols. The performance of single and combined tests was determined. 46 patients (median age: 12 years, ranged 8-16 y.o.) were recruited, 30 (70%) previously diagnosed of asthma. BHR was detected in 93.47% of the children. The exercise challenge test detected BHR in 11/46 (23.90%) patients, bronchodilator test in 10/46 (21.70%), mannitol in 36/45 (80%) and methacoline in 41/45 (91.11%). The total number of patients with BHR was detected using a combination of the methacoline and mannitol tests. A combination of the methacoline test performed first, followed by the mannitol test, was able to diagnose BHR in 100% of children with lower number of tests (N=45) than if the order was reversed (N=50). Methacholine and mannitol tests detect BHR in most children with suspected EIB. Bronchodilator and exercise tests show a low positivity rate. A combination of the methacoline test, followed by the mannitol test, gives the highest return to identify BHR in children for the diagnosis of EIB. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 12/2014; 26(1). DOI:10.1111/pai.12319 · 3.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dyspnea represents 3-4 % of consultations at primary care medicine (general medicine, emergency medicine) and is found in 14 % of the interviewed general population. It is defined as an abnormal and uncomfortable breathing and can be classified according to the mode of appearance, the breathing pattern or the rhythm. Different classifications are used to specify the severity of the situation: visual analog scale, functional classification of the New York Heart Association, dyspnea modified scale from the Medical Research Council, ... Rare among young people, dyspnea often hides asthma; more prevalent among seniors, it is often secondary to chronic lung or heart disease. The rational approach is the same in general medicine and in the emergency room. The management starts with an assessment of the severity of the patient's clinical situation, via the early warning score. The critical patient requires to be managed according to the progressive and cyclical ABCDE approach. For non-critical patients, a traditional approach and a reasoned method are needed. In patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the use of the Anthonissen criteria allows to orient toward a pulmonary superinfection or another cause of worsening dyspnea (cardiac, ...). In case of suspected pulmonary embolism, the Geneva score and the modified Wells score help to separate low, intermediate or high probability cases of pulmonary embolism. D-dimers have a very good negative predictive value in the low and middle risk group and pulmonary CT angiography applies only to a smaller group of dyspnoeic patients with a high probability of pulmonary embolism. Echocardiography has a prominent role to assess the LV systolic function, the search for pulmonary artery hypertension, the vascular filling state, etc. We speak of psychogenic dyspnea after having excluded the potentially serious pathologies.
    Revue medicale de Bruxelles 09/2015; 36(4):335-342.
Show more