A prospective validation of the SAME-TT2R2 score: how to identify atrial fibrillation patients who will have good anticoagulation control on warfarin

Internal and Emergency Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.41). 03/2014; 9(4). DOI: 10.1007/s11739-014-1065-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Stroke prevention, achieved with oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT), is central to the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Well-managed OAT, as reflected by a long time in therapeutic range (TTR), is associated with good clinical outcomes. The SAME-TT2R2 score has been proposed to identify patients who will maintain a high average TTR on vitamin K antagonists (VKA) treatment. The objective of the study was to validate this score in a cohort of AF patients followed by an anticoagulation clinic. We applied the SAME-TT2R2 score to 1,089 patients with AF on VKAs followed by two anticoagulation clinics. The median TTR overall for the whole cohort was 73.0 %. There was a significant decline in mean (or median) TTR in relation to the SAME-TT2R2 score (p = 0.042). When the SAME-TT2R2 scores were categorized we find a TTR 74.0 % for score ≤2 and 68.0 % for score >2 (p = 0.006). The rate of major bleeding events and stroke/TIA was 1.78 × 100 patient-years (pt-yrs) and 1.26 × 100 pt-yrs, respectively. No relationship exists between the SAME-TT2R2 score and adverse events. We describe the first validation of the SAME-TT2R2 score in AF patients where, despite an overall good quality of anticoagulation, the SAME-TT2R2 score is able to identify the patients who are less likely to do well on VKA therapy if this is the chosen OAT.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Atrial fibrillation (AF) confers increased risk of stroke and other thromboembolic events, and oral anticoagulation therefore is the essential part of AF management to reduce the risk of this complication. Until recently, the vitamin K antagonists (VKAs, e.g. warfarin) were the only oral anticoagulants available, acting by decreased synthesis of vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors (II, VI, IX, and X). The VKAs had many limitations: delayed onset and prolonged offset of action, variability of anticoagulant effect among patients, multiple food and drug interactions affecting pharmacological properties of warfarin, narrow therapeutic window, obligatory regular laboratory control, which all made warfarin ‘inconvenient’ both for patients and clinicians. The limitations of VKAs led to development of new class of drugs collectively defined as non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which included direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban). The NOACs avoid many of the VKA drawbacks. In this review, we will focus on the current evidence justifying use of NOACs in non-valvular AF.
    Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine 10/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.tcm.2014.10.017 · 2.07 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: The Heart Rhythm Society convened a research symposium on December 9–10, 2013, in Washington, DC, that focused on the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) as well as AF-related stroke and morbidity. Attendees sought to summarize advances in understanding AF since a 2008 National Institutes of Health (NIH) conference on this topic1 and to identify continued knowledge gaps and current research priorities. The research symposium also sought to identify key deficiencies and opportunities in research infrastructure, operations, and methodologies. The committee sought to identify both basic research targets and how clinical AF research could be improved in the current health care environment. This whitepaper summarizes our deliberations in an effort to accelerate progress toward preventing AF and its consequences. Although largely focused on primary prevention of AF, the paper also addresses some aspects of secondary prevention of recurrent AF due to the continuum of risk factors that contribute to arrhythmogenesis, permissive left atrial (LA) substrates, and the emergence of AF.
    Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society 11/2014; pii: S1547-5271(14):01290-9. DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.11.011 · 4.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have changed the landscape for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Given the huge burden of AF in Asians, more attention to stroke prevention is clearly needed. Aiming to provide an overview and reappraisal of stroke prevention in Asians with AF, we searched MEDLINE for information on NOACs in Asians. In addition, abstracts from national and international cardiovascular meetings were studied to identify unpublished studies. In the 4 recent Phase 3 trials comparing NOACs to warfarin, a consistent pattern is evident. For efficacy endpoints in the comparison of NOACs vs warfarin, a significant reduction in stroke/systemic embolization was seen for dabigatran 150mg [HR 0.45 (0.28-0.72)], with non-significant trends seen for lower stroke/systemic embolization with other NOACs, except edoxaban 30mg. A similar pattern was seen for ischaemic stroke, with a significant reduction for dabigatran 150mg [HR 0.55 (0.32-0.950]. For haemorrhagic stroke, all NOAC regimes, except rivaroxaban 20mg, had significantly lower hazard ratios. No evidence of increased myocardial infarction was found for NOACs. All-cause mortality was significantly lowered amongst Asian patients on edoxaban 60mg compared to warfarin [HR 0.63 (0.40-0.98)] with non-significant trends to lower mortality with dabigatran 150mg, rivaroxaban and edoxaban 30mg. For safety endpoints, all the NOAC regimes, except rivaroxaban 20mg, significantly reduced major bleeding and 'all bleeding' events. Intracranial haemorrhage was consistently lowered by all NOACs. None of NOACs increased gastrointestinal bleeding. These information suggested that NOACs should be preferentially indicated for stroke prevention in Asians with AF. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
    International Journal of Cardiology 11/2014; 180C:246-254. DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.182 · 6.18 Impact Factor


Available from
Feb 19, 2015