Article

Using tablets to support self-regulated learning in a longitudinal integrated clerkship.

Medical Education Online (Impact Factor: 1.27). 03/2014; 19:23638. DOI: 10.3402/meo.v19.23638
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Introduction : The need to train physicians committed to learning throughout their careers has prompted medical schools to encourage the development and practice of self-regulated learning by students. Longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) require students to exercise self-regulated learning skills. As mobile tools, tablets can potentially support self-regulation among LIC students. Methods : We provided 15 LIC students with tablet computers with access to the electronic health record (EHR), to track their patient cohort, and a multiplatform online notebook, to support documentation and retrieval of self-identified clinical learning issues. Students received a 1-hour workshop on the relevant features of the tablet and online notebook. Two focus groups with the students were used to evaluate the program, one early and one late in the year and were coded by two raters. Results : Students used the tablet to support their self-regulated learning in ways that were unique to their learning styles and increased access to resources and utilization of down-time. Students who used the tablet to self-monitor and target learning demonstrated the utility of tablets as learning tools. Conclusions : LICs are environments rich in opportunity for self-regulated learning. Tablets can enhance students' ability to develop and employ self-regulatory skills in a clinical context.

1 Follower
 · 
48 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To identify how medical student learning experiences in a new longitudinally integrated clinical clerkship (LICC) programme impacted students' learning. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 medical students at three points in their training. We used an inductive, thematic analytic approach to data. Interviews (n = 35) were iteratively and independently coded by research team members to identify and corroborate key emergent themes. Students in the LICC programme reported slow but ongoing increases in patient responsibility, examination-driven learning, programme flexibility to address educational gaps, and a strong and positive perception of educational continuity through a longitudinal primary care educator and similar case mix throughout the year. Student learning experiences in an LICC programme are both similar to and different from those in a traditional rotational clerkship programme. Students in the integrated clerkship were clear and unequivocal about the benefits of working with one teacher across time and caring for patients at different stages of the same disease in multiple settings. These findings have implications for clinical education development and design.
    Medical Education 08/2008; 42(7):729-32. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03040.x · 3.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the health professions we expect practitioners and trainees to engage in self-regulation of their learning and practice. For example, doctors are responsible for diagnosing their own learning needs and pursuing professional development opportunities; medical residents are expected to identify what they do not know when caring for patients and to seek help from supervisors when they need it, and medical school curricula are increasingly called upon to support self-regulation as a central learning outcome. Given the importance of self-regulation in both health professions education and ongoing professional practice, our aim was to generate a snapshot of the state of the science in medical education research in this area. To achieve this goal, we gathered literature focused on self-regulation or self-directed learning undertaken from multiple perspectives. Then, with support from a multi-component theoretical framework, we created an overarching map of the themes addressed thus far and emerging findings. We built from that integrative overview to consider contributions, connections and gaps in research on self-regulation to date. Based on this reflective analysis, we conclude that the medical education community's understanding about self-regulation will continue to advance as we: (i) consider how learning is undertaken within the complex social contexts of clinical training and practice; (ii) think of self-regulation within an integrative perspective that allows us to combine disparate strands of research and to consider self-regulation across the training continuum in medicine, from learning to practice; (iii) attend to the grain size of analysis both thoughtfully and intentionally, and (iv) most essentially, extend our efforts to understand the need for and best practices in support of self-regulation.
    Medical Education 01/2012; 46(1):71-9. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04100.x · 3.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This Guide provides an overview of educational theory relevant to learning from experience. It considers experience gained in clinical workplaces from early medical student days through qualification to continuing professional development. Three key assumptions underpin the Guide: learning is 'situated'; it can be viewed either as an individual or a collective process; and the learning relevant to this Guide is triggered by authentic practice-based experiences. We first provide an overview of the guiding principles of experiential learning and significant historical contributions to its development as a theoretical perspective. We then discuss socio-cultural perspectives on experiential learning, highlighting their key tenets and drawing together common threads between theories. The second part of the Guide provides examples of learning from experience in practice to show how theoretical stances apply to clinical workplaces. Early experience, student clerkships and residency training are discussed in turn. We end with a summary of the current state of understanding.
    Medical Teacher 02/2012; 34(2):e102-15. DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2012.650741 · 2.05 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Download
1 Download
Available from
Mar 16, 2015