Nutrient-rich foods, cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: the Rotterdam study.

European journal of clinical nutrition (Impact Factor: 2.95). 03/2014; DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.35
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Background/Objectives:The nutrient-rich food (NRF) index assesses nutrient quality of individual food items by ranking them according to their nutrient composition. The index reflects the nutrient density of the overall diet. We examined the associations between the NRF9.3 index-a score on the basis of nine beneficial nutrients (protein, fiber, vitamins and minerals) and three nutrients to limit (saturated fat, sugar and sodium)-incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and all-cause mortality.Subjects/Methods:A total of 4969 persons aged 55 and older from the Rotterdam Study, a prospective cohort study in the Netherlands, were studied. First, all foods were scored on the basis of their nutrient composition, resulting in an NRF9.3 score on food item level. Subsequently, they were converted into individual weighted scores on the basis of the amount of calories of each food item consumed by the subjects and the total energy intake. The hazard ratios (HRs) of the NRF9.3 index score were adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, smoking history, doctor-prescribed diet, alcohol consumption and education.Results:Food groups that contributed most to the NRF9.3 index score were vegetables, milk and milk products, fruit, bread and potatoes. A high NRF9.3 index score was inversely associated with all-cause mortality (HR Q4 versus Q1: 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.74, 0.96)). Associations were stronger in women than in men. The NRF9.3 index score was not associated with incidence of CVD.Conclusion:Elderly with a higher NRF9.3 index score, indicating more beneficial components and/or less limiting components, had a lower risk of all-cause mortality. Consuming a nutrient-dense diet may improve survival.European Journal of Clinical Nutrition advance online publication, 19 March 2014; doi:10.1038/ejcn.2014.35.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diet is a major lifestyle-related risk factor which impacts on the risk of various chronic diseases. Dietary intake can be also assessed by subjective report as well as objective observation. Assessment by subjective report can be done in open-ended manner such as dietary recalls or records or in closed-ended format like food frequency questionnaires. Each method has inherent pros and cons. Researchers have concentrated their efforts to assess dietary intakes accurately and enhance the feasibility in epidemiologic studies. This article reviews common dietary assessment methods and their feasibility in epidemiologic studies.
    07/2014; 36:e2014009. DOI:10.4178/epih/e2014009
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diet, along with lifestyle factors, is an important determinant of the health status of an individual and of a community. Dietary assessment at the population level provides us with key information on the frequency and distribution of possible inadequate diets and/or nutritional status. It is also useful as input into the elaboration of food and nutrition policies aiming to improve dietary habits and the health status of a community. This article reviews the characteristics, advantages and limitations of the 24-hour dietary recall method (24hDR), which is one of the most widely used tools in nutrition epidemiology to identify food, energy and nutrient intake in national nutrition surveys, cross-sectional studies, clinical trials and cohort studies as well as in the evaluation of individual dietary intake and Total Diet assessment. To reduce the key factors associated with bias, the importance of previously trained interviewers is highlighted, as well as the role of support materials and the contribution of novel technologies. Copyright AULA MEDICA EDICIONES 2015. Published by AULA MEDICA. All rights reserved.


Available from
Jun 5, 2014