An altered spinal serotonergic system contributes to increased thermal nociception in an animal model of depression.

Experimental Brain Research (Impact Factor: 2.17). 03/2014; DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3871-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The olfactory bulbectomized (OB) rat, an animal model of chronic depression with comorbid anxiety, exhibits a profound dysregulation of the brain serotonergic signalling, a neurotransmission system involved in pain transmission and modulation. We here report an increased nociceptive response of OB rats in the tail flick test which is reverted after chronic, but not acute, administration of fluoxetine. Autoradiographic studies demonstrated down-regulation of 5-HT transporters ([(3)H]citalopram binding) and decreased functionality of 5-HT1A receptors (8-OH-DPAT-stimulated [(35)S]GTPγS binding) in the dorsal horn of the lumbar spinal cord in OB rats. Acute administration of fluoxetine (5-40 mg/kg i.p.) did not modify tail flick latencies in OB rats. However, chronic fluoxetine (10 mg/kg/day s.c., 14 days; osmotic minipumps) progressively attenuated OB-associated thermal hyperalgesia, and a total normalization of the nociceptive response was achieved at the end of the treatment with the antidepressant. In these animals, autoradiographic studies revealed further down-regulation of 5-HT transporters and normalization in the functionality of 5-HT1A receptors on the spinal cord. On the other hand, acute morphine (0.5-10 mg/kg s.c.) produced a similar analgesic effect in OB and sham and OB rats, and no changes were detected in the density ([(3)H]DAMGO binding) and functionality (DAMGO-stimulated [(35)S]GTPγS binding) of spinal μ-opioid receptors in OB rats before and after chronic fluoxetine. Our findings demonstrate the participation of the spinal serotonergic system in the increased thermal nociception exhibited by the OB rat and the antinociceptive effect of chronic fluoxetine in this animal model of depression.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The highly disagreeable sensation of pain results from an extraordinarily complex and interactive series of mechanisms integrated at all levels of the neuroaxis, from the periphery, via the dorsal horn to higher cerebral structures. Pain is usually elicited by the activation of specific nociceptors ('nociceptive pain'). However, it may also result from injury to sensory fibres, or from damage to the CNS itself ('neuropathic pain'). Although acute and subchronic, nociceptive pain fulfils a warning role, chronic and/or severe nociceptive and neuropathic pain is maladaptive. Recent years have seen a progressive unravelling of the neuroanatomical circuits and cellular mechanisms underlying the induction of pain. In addition to familiar inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins and bradykinin, potentially-important, pronociceptive roles have been proposed for a variety of 'exotic' species, including protons, ATP, cytokines, neurotrophins (growth factors) and nitric oxide. Further, both in the periphery and in the CNS, non-neuronal glial and immunecompetent cells have been shown to play a modulatory role in the response to inflammation and injury, and in processes modifying nociception. In the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, wherein the primary processing of nociceptive information occurs, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors are activated by glutamate released from nocisponsive afferent fibres. Their activation plays a key role in the induction of neuronal sensitization, a process underlying prolonged painful states. In addition, upon peripheral nerve injury, a reduction of inhibitory interneurone tone in the dorsal horn exacerbates sensitized states and further enhance nociception. As concerns the transfer of nociceptive information to the brain, several pathways other than the classical spinothalamic tract are of importance: for example, the postsynaptic dorsal column pathway. In discussing the roles of supraspinal structures in pain sensation, differences between its 'discriminative-sensory' and 'affective-cognitive' dimensions should be emphasized. The purpose of the present article is to provide a global account of mechanisms involved in the induction of pain. Particular attention is focused on cellular aspects and on the consequences of peripheral nerve injury. In the first part of the review, neuronal pathways for the transmission of nociceptive information from peripheral nerve terminals to the dorsal horn, and therefrom to higher centres, are outlined. This neuronal framework is then exploited for a consideration of peripheral, spinal and supraspinal mechanisms involved in the induction of pain by stimulation of peripheral nociceptors, by peripheral nerve injury and by damage to the CNS itself. Finally, a hypothesis is forwarded that neurotrophins may play an important role in central, adaptive mechanisms modulating nociception. An improved understanding of the origins of pain should facilitate the development of novel strategies for its more effective treatment.
    Progress in Neurobiology 02/1999; 57(1):1-164. · 10.30 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Prior research has suggested reductions in the density of serotonin transporter (SERT) binding sites in blood platelets and post-mortem brain tissue of depressed patients. We sought to determine whether patients with unipolar major depression have diminished SERT availability as assessed by both brainstem [123I]β-CIT SPECT and platelet [3H]paroxetine binding.Methods: Drug-free depressed and healthy subjects were injected with 211 ± 22 MBq [123I]β-CIT and imaged 24 ± 2 h later under equilibrium conditions. A ratio of specific to nonspecific brain uptake (V3″ = (brainstem-occipital)/occipital), a measure proportional to the binding potential (Bmax/Kd), was used for all comparisons.Results: Results showed a statistically significant reduction in brainstem V3″ values in depressed as compared to healthy subjects (3.1 ± .9 vs. 3.8 ± .8, p = .02). Platelet [3H]paroxetine binding was not altered (Bmax = 2389 ± 484 vs. 2415 ± 538 fmol/mg protein, p = .91) and was not significantly correlated with brainstem [123I]β-CIT binding (r = −0.14, p = .48).Conclusions: These data are the first to suggest reductions in the density of brain SERT binding sites in living depressed patients. These findings provide further support for a preeminent role for alterations in serotonergic neurons in the pathophysiology of depression.
    Biological Psychiatry 12/1998; 44(11):1090-1098. · 9.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Morphine-6beta-glucuronide is a major metabolite of morphine with potent analgesic actions. To explore the importance of this opiate when administered as a drug by its own or in morphine action, we studied the locomotor activity response to morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide in drug-naive C57 BL/6JBom mice. The effects of administration of the two opiates on a battery of 7 different locomotor activities were studied and compared to saline controls. A dose of 20 micromol/kg morphine-6-glucuronide resulted in more locomotion than the same dose of morphine, while at higher doses (up to 120 micromol/kg), similar increases for most locomotor behaviours were recorded for both drugs. Pretreatment with naltrindole indicated that the delta-receptors play an equivalent but minor role in mediating both morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine hyperlocomotion. Administration of high naltrexone doses (10 mg/kg) completely abolished the locomotor stimulation induced by both opiates. However, at intermediate naltrexone doses of 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg, morphine-induced behaviours was completely inhibited while morphine-6-glucuronide induced behaviours demonstrated partial resistance to naltrexone inhibition. The mu1-specific receptor antagonist naloxonazine caused 75% reduction of morphine induced behaviours and only 50% inhibition of morphine-6-glucuronide induced behaviors. Taken together our observations indicated general similarity but also marked differences between morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide with respect to opiate receptors mediating the locomotor stimulatory effect.
    Pharmacology &amp Toxicology 01/1998; 82(1):3-10.