Nanotherapeutics—Product Development Along the “Nanomaterial” Discussion

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Impact Factor: 3.01). 03/2014; 103(3). DOI: 10.1002/jps.23879
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Nanomaterials have become part of formulation development in the pharmaceutical industry and offer exciting opportunities in the area of targeted drug delivery. But they may also exert unexpected toxicities and potentially pose a threat to human health and the environment. Since the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks recommended a definition of “nanomaterials” for implementation into the existing and upcoming regulatory framework in the European Union, a discussion about safety requirements of new nanoscale products has emerged. At the same time, the Food and Drug Administration of the United States still observes recent developments in this area. Although the impact on the pharmaceutical product chain is still uncertain, guidelines on risk assessment in food products and cosmetics are available and offer a preview of future developments in the regimens of pharmaceuticals. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nanomedicines are highly complex products and are the result of difficult to control manufacturing processes. Nonbiological complex drugs and their biological counterparts can comprise nanoparticles and therefore show nanomedicine characteristics. They consist of not fully known nonhomomolecular structures, and can therefore not be characterized by physicochemical means only. Also, intended copies of nanomedicines (follow-on similars) may have clinically meaningful differences, creating the regulatory challenge of how to grant a high degree of assurance for patients' benefit and safety. As an example, the current regulatory approach for marketing authorization of intended copies of nonbiological complex drugs appears inappropriate; also, a valid strategy incorporating the complexity of such systems is undefined. To demonstrate sufficient similarity and comparability, a stepwise quality, nonclinical and clinical approach is necessary to obtain market authorization for follow-on products as therapeutic alternatives, substitution and/or interchangeable products. To fill the regulatory gap, harmonized and science-based standards are needed.
    Nanomedicine 03/2015; 10(4):659-674. DOI:10.2217/nnm.14.189 · 5.82 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Drug-eluting microspheres are used for embolization of hypervascular tumors and allow for local controlled drug release. Although the drug release from the microspheres relies on fast ion-exchange, so far only slow-releasing in vitro dissolution methods have been correlated to in vivo data. Three in vitro release methods are assessed in this study for their potential to predict slow in vivo release of sunitinib from chemoembolization spheres to the plasma, and fast local in vivo release obtained in an earlier study in rabbits. Release in an orbital shaker was slow (t50%=4.5h, 84% release) compared to fast release in USP 4 flow-through implant cells (t50%=1h, 100% release). Release of sunitinib from microspheres in saline in dialysis inserts was prolonged and incomplete (t50%=9days, 68% release) due to low drug diffusion through the dialysis membrane. The slow-release profile fitted best to low sunitinib plasma AUC following injection of sunitinib-eluting spheres. Although limited by lack of standardization, release in the orbital shaker fitted best to local in vivo sunitinib concentrations. Drug release in USP flow-through implant cells was too fast to correlate with local concentrations, although this method is preferred to discriminate between different sphere types. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    International Journal of Pharmaceutics 11/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.11.041 · 3.79 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the last decade, nanotherapeutics gained increasingly important role in drug delivery because of their frequently beneficial pharmacokinetics (PK) and lower toxicity when compared to classical systemic drug delivery. In view of therapeutic payload delivery, convective transport is crucial for systemic distribution via circulatory system, but the target domain is tissue outside vessels where transport is governed by diffusion. Here, we have computationally investigated the understudied interplay of physical transports to characterize PK of payload of nanotherapeutics. The analysis of human vasculature tree showed that convective transport is still 5 times more efficient than diffusion suggesting that circulating and payload releasing drug vectors can contribute mostly to systemic delivery. By comparing payload delivery using systemic circulation and drug vectors to microenvironment, internalized vectors were the most efficient and showed Area under the Curve almost 100 higher than in systemic delivery. The newly introduced zone of influence parameter indicated that vectors, especially internalized, lead to the largest tissue fraction covered with therapeutically significant payload concentration. The internalization to microenvironment minimizes effects of plasma domain on payload extravasation from nanotherapeutics. The computed results showed that classical PK, which mostly relies on concentration profiles in plasma, sometimes might be inadequate or not sufficient in explaining therapeutic efficacy of nanotherapeutics. These results provide a deeper look into PK of drug vectors and can help in the design of better drug delivery strategies.
    Drug Delivery 04/2015; DOI:10.3109/10717544.2015.1022837 · 2.20 Impact Factor